Abortion, Vaccine Mandates and Canada's Biggest Hypocrite: Justin Trudeau
As even those in a coma would be aware, on June 24, 2022 the United States Supreme Court overturned the 1973 Roe vs Wade decision. […]
As even those in a coma would be aware, on June 24, 2022 the United States Supreme Court overturned the 1973 Roe vs Wade decision. […]
The clinical trial evidence is clear: COVID ‘vaccines’ do not save a single life. And the real world evidence resoundingly shows the ‘vaccines’ are neither safe nor effective. New revelations from Argentina further underscore the lengths Pfizer-sponsored researchers will go to in order to convince us otherwise.
If you believe you did the right thing by getting injected with the Brave New World concoctions being passed off as COVID ‘vaccines’, then you are terribly mistaken. If the truth hurts, you may want to have some Panadol handy while reading this article.
Back in 2016, I had an email exchange with prominent climate change alarmist Naomi Oreskes. It might have been a brief exchange, but it revealed volumes about the sorry state of climate change “research” and the so-called “peer review” process employed by journals like Science.
Instead of being relegated to the scrap heap of junk science history – where it belongs – the terrible Bangladesh Mask Study has just been published in Science. To unsuspecting readers, this suggests the study was a quality endeavour able to pass one of the world’s most demanding peer-review processes. In this article, I explain why nothing could be further from the truth.
Given the contrarian nature of much of my content, I don’t expect everyone to like me or my work. However, using half-truths, outright lies and personal attacks to discredit me or anyone else with the temerity to go against the grain is not cool. Today, I sink my teeth into the two 1-star reviews of The Great Cholesterol Con that appear on Amazon.com.
Autopsy studies are the “Gold Standard” for determining cause of death, so what do they tell us about COVID ‘vaccine’ fatalities?
The evidence for face masks is so poor that mask proponents are not only blatantly lying about the research, but openly calling for propaganda campaigns to “reframe” people’s thinking. Goebbels would have been proud.
A distressing incident in a Melbourne suburb last week highlights the destructive psychological toll of Australia’s draconian COVID mandates.
There is so much nonsense being spouted in support of masks that, for the first time ever on AnthonyColpo.com, I will have to do a Part 4. In this instalment, I will return to the inefficacy of masks in preventing influenza and ‘COVID’ infections. I’ll explain why outfits like the CDC who claim masks are effective are shameless liars who carefully hand-pick their evidence, dismissing or turning a blind eye to the abundant non-supportive research.
Copyright © 2026 | WordPress Theme by MH Themes