Naomi Oreskes is at it again. The calumnious climate alarmist has again partnered with protégé Geoffrey Supran to publish what may just be their dumbest paper yet.
Australian health authorities claim “vaccines save lives,” but repeatedly fail to answer my FOI requests with any evidence. Little wonder: The available data reveals it is the vaxxxinated who suffer higher death rates.
Gates, Soros, Fauci, Trudeau, Harari, Pelosi, and many others in the “ruling elite” – the list seems endless.
Much of what is written about rape is virtue-signalling fluff that does nothing to reduce the actual incidence of this sickening crime. In this article, I’ll explain why MeToo, feminism and wokeness are a failure, and why sexual assault is on the rise again.
Repeated studies confirm Australia’s place as one of the most drunken countries on Earth, and Australian women as the most inebriated female population on the planet.
Numerous studies claim moderate alcohol consumption may confer health benefits to those over 40-50 (depending on which study you’re reading). This article explains why the alleged health benefits of moderate drinking are a myth, one based on statistical artifact rather than physiological reality.
Pro-abortion activists claim pregnancy termination is all about women’s health, but the data show otherwise. The recent Supreme Court decision has also confirmed that Justin Trudeau is not just Canada’s biggest wanker, but also the country’s most egregious hypocrite.
The clinical trial evidence is clear: COVID ‘vaccines’ do not save a single life. And the real world evidence resoundingly shows the ‘vaccines’ are neither safe nor effective. New revelations from Argentina further underscore the lengths Pfizer-sponsored researchers will go to in order to convince us otherwise.
If you believe you did the right thing by getting injected with the Brave New World concoctions being passed off as COVID ‘vaccines’, then you are terribly mistaken. If the truth hurts, you may want to have some Panadol handy while reading this article.
Back in 2016, I had an email exchange with prominent climate change alarmist Naomi Oreskes. It might have been a brief exchange, but it revealed volumes about the sorry state of climate change “research” and the so-called “peer review” process employed by journals like Science.