If you still believe the official story after watching this, seek help immediately.
Mr E has put together a video focusing on the moments before, during and after Charlie Kirk’s alleged ‘assassination.’
If you still think this blatant farce is a bonafide event after watching the video, then there’s clearly no helping you.
The video contains some patently ridiculous anomalies: Kirk’s mouth and nose temporarily disappear, the letter “F” inexplicably disappears from the “Freedom” slogan on his tee, his hairline changes, his pinky ring moves fingers, and the bizarre bouncy movement of his t-shirt is accompanied by what appears to be some sort of tubing around his stomach area (perhaps for a fake blood squib, although it is clear the ‘spurting blood’ has been digitally altered or added in).
It’s heartening to see many can see through this obviously staged event - and disheartening to see so many cannot. I’m still getting the occasional genius who calls me “nutter”, “delusional”, “idiot”, even (yawn) “schizophrenic”. I’m guessing these amateur hour psychoanalysts pulled their psychiatry degrees from a cereal packet, because the one thing they all have in common is a complete inability to explain the growing list of anomalies in this so-called ‘assassination’.
Most don’t even try; they resort straight to name-calling and insults. They are not acting from a platform of reason and logic; they are lashing out emotionally.
As Mr E laments, “it’s amazing that, even in 2025, people still believe the narrative”.
“But remember, the narrative in this case is a trauma-based mind control narrative, so people get really emotional about this issue and they do not think critically about it, and so it’s a highly triggering emotional event primarily, and if you look at the mass media coverage, it’s all about the emotion, and that’s the weapon they use against us”.
The frequently unhinged Louisiana Republican Rep Clay Higgins has wasted no time in trying to capitalize on this phenomenon. He promptly got his psycho-tyrant on and declared anyone who "belittled the assassination of Charlie Kirk” (i.e. called BS on the absurd official narrative) should be banned from “ALL PLATFORMS FOREVER”, banned from school, and forbidden to hold a driver’s license.
Meanwhile, the US State Department bans anyone “celebrating” the ‘assassination’ of Kirk from entering the USSSA.
Note how many people have given a red love heart to the idea of using censorship to block people from entering the United States of America, a country that seems to really hate the First Amendment of which it once boasted incessantly.
During COVID, the “right” pissed and moaned about censorship by the “left”, but I’ve long maintained they are two sides of the same turd. Now they are openly confirming it.
All this is most ironic, considering Kirk was wearing a “FREEDOM” tee during his alleged assassination. It’s like they’re laughing in our faces.
I probably would too, if I was sinister enough to pull stunts like this and people actually fell for them.
Before I go, Charlie, Erika and friends have some more Masonic symbolism for you.
Every time they do these absurd rituals more awaken – thanks I enjoyed the article
Good observations. Thanks for sharing. Aligns with other “incidents” as a possible black-operation within the broader narrative for control and obstruction of freedom.
Is the subliminal message: “Freedom gets shot”?
Yes, I think so. Substacker Sir Escanor noticed that the name Charles/Charlie means Free Man. So it is the symbolic assassination of the ‘freeman’, heralding more control, more surveillance and more psyop BS.
“Turning Point, USA.”
Your case isn’t convincing, beginning with why Kirk would agree to go along with faking his death and never seeing his family again.
“The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” – George Orwell
Well there ya go. Wise ol Orwell.
I’m not going anywhere lol. YOU came HERE and the best you can do is call me names.
That’s because you have nothing, you are nothing.
Go back to mummy’s basement, troll.
“All the world’s a stage, And all the men and women merely players; They have their exits and their entrances, And one man in his time plays many parts …” – Shakespeare (who also wasn’t a real person)
Faking one’s death is not usually part of the production.
I think you’d be surprised Ben. Faking one’s death, faking one’s attempted assassination, staging bombings, staging coups … so very much faking. If the media is covering it exhaustively, you can bet the powers that be had a hand in it. Is everything faked? Of course not. Only the events that need to be scripted because they’re important to moving the agenda forward by dividing us or getting us to agree to give up freedoms. And we readily comply.
The only thing that surprises me is why or how The Spirit of The West has died.
I’d say that killing The West’s spirit is one assassination they didn’t fake. When you control the money, media, medicine, education, politics and everything in between, it’s easy to intentionally collapse a society which seems to be what’s happening. You can’t easily control healthy, smart, savvy people who have the ability to make of their lives what they will. But if you poison the food, the entertainment, the young people’s minds, you gradually create a society of people who are too sick and tired to take back their power. That’s why it’s so important to remove yourself from as many of their “systems” as possible. Credit unions, home schooling, natural health care and old-fashioned entertainment like board games and camping are steps in that direction. As is learning the truth about how our world really works.
Agree, but I believe if it’s on TV there’s a 99% chance it’s fake.
Yup, probably so
Maybe Charlie was told he would never see his family again, if he didn’t go along with the production? Maybe he was threatened with his family’s lives? Lots of ways to motivate compliance, including blackmail. CIA and Mossad are very convincing powers? Regardless; the narrative is designed to be decisive in order to keep the masses focused on the doubt and on each other, not the REAL murderers.
There’s no reason why he wouldn’t see his family again if they were all in agreement.
If he was facing pressure and death threats from the wealthy jewish donors who propelled him to power because he’d become a liability (but who acknowledged nonetheless that he had been a good and loyal son for Israel) he may have been given an ultimatum – either stand down ‘Charlie Kirk Young Conservative’ and we’ll fake your death as the exit strategy, or don’t, and risk the real thing.
I have been thinking the same thing that they faked his assassination. It would answer many of the unanswered questions!
They made him an offer he couldn’t refuse. In the book ‘confessions of an economic hitman’ john perkins wrote about his job was to go to south and central American countries and make lucrative offers to leaders there to become a US puppet. If the offer was refused then a series of people with different titles came in and things got uglier and the final step would be to assassinate the person. Too many Americans think that our government would never do that to their own citizens but there really is no reason to believe that they wouldn’t, so the offer was probably fake assassination or real assassination?
Theory sounds ridiculous. So his young assassin agreed to take the fall for what reason? Where is the body? The coroner was paid off?
There is no body. The character was killed off. The actor is alive.
Now all you need is evidence of any of this.
We have plenty of evidence – waxwork hands? We don’t have proof though.
No, you don’t.
Believe what you will.
Really great book that accelerated my awareness of the game.
There are questions as to whether he even has a family.
Exactly, why would his “family” be real if he is fake? Like Barry and Michael’s fake children… it’s all theater.
consider his “wife” wasn’t his wife in real life. like any other actor and actress couple are married on tv. like al and peg bundy were married on tv but not in real life. it’s all a show.
If everything is a psyop, nothing is. How do you tell them apart?
whelp, i guess you don’t. the beast wants our undivided attention 24/7, so you just don’t give it up. do not spend your time dissecting and analyzing every event. focus on doing some good in your small world on the day to day.
You stop paying attention and getting emotionally caught up in the show. Draw yourself close to the Lord and he will run to you. Worship Christ, love your neighbor and provide for your family. The rest melts away.
I try not to remind The Lord I exist, in case He’s still pissed off at me.
He loves you. He doesn’t need reminding, my friend.
This is getting silly – he hasn’t faked his own death.
yes it is sillly. no one will ever know what happened to ck. but hundreds of millions of people will waste millions of millions of hours researching it. books will be written, and some people will devote their careers to this investigation. just like jfk. and the end result will be….nothing. the truth will never be known and all we can say for sure is, it is not what has been presented. so lets all move on to more important things.
I would say they made clones out all of them. Just like the rest of them all are clones. He’s probably on an island with Jeffrey Epstein.
“Kirk” is a character.
If you can find anyone who said he was a fictional character before 9/10 I’d be very impressed.
I’m one. I agree with MiriAF (if you don’t read her stuff, find her on Substack): “If you know their name, they are in the game.” All of these people are characters. That’s why you know about them.
Kirk, for example, was “discovered” at 17 and suddenly had millions of dollars of rich Zionist backers that bankrolled TPUSA. His family history is thin and his backstory laughably improbable. He is based on the Alex P. Keaton archetype. A persona already seeded into the American collective unconscious. Zuckerberg, Bezos, Gates, every Hollywood star and TV personality either comes from central casting or is given an offer they can’t refuse to take the ticket from TPTB or else they remain in obscurity.
There is a go fund me with almost 6000000 dollars. I can think of 6 million reasons. His family will go with him. His “wife” didn’t shed a tear. Doesn’t even look like her. And soon the “shooter” will commit suicide while the guards are sleeping on the job. His father got a 1,000,000 reward for turning in his son.
With this level of perspicacity about an event you didn’t attend, involving people you never knew, you should be playing the stock market.
I don’t need “perspicacity” as I can think critically. Look at evidence presented and see and know bullshit. It’s all fake BS. Is that how blood comes out of the body? Dark red and like a faucet? A 22 year old douchebag mad a 200 yard shot and the velocity would blow his head off. The Charlie bill or Kirk bill or some BS. 6000000 gofund me and the father got 1000000 turn in his son. Come on! I don’t have to prove why or how to see it’s f’ing nonsense!
I don’t need “perspicacity” as I can think critically. Look at evidence presented and see and know bullshit. It’s all fake BS. Is that how blood comes out of the body? Dark red and like a faucet? A 22 year old douchebag mad a 200 yard shot and the velocity would blow his head off. The Charlie bill or Kirk bill or some BS. 6000000 gofund me and the father got 1000000 turn in his son. Come on! I don’t have to prove why or how to see it’s f’ing nonsense!
GoFundMes and book deals are the payoff indicators.
Except Erika Kirk now runs TPUSA. Strange way to run off with Charlie.
I totally agree he wouldn’t fake his own death only to have to live in hiding when he has a family who he adores. Whilst the cover up is ridiculous I do believe he was assassinated but by whom is the true mystery.
The event is completely unbelievable under a minimum of examination. Read and watch this just for one point:
https://open.substack.com/pub/anthonycolpo/p/what-happens-when-you-shoot-something?r=b6zcr&utm_medium=ios
A 30-06 round would have ripped his head off and sprayed blood all over anyone within 10 feet of him. And that’s not even the worst part of the story.
Your assuming that his family was real and not created to run this psyop.
That’s because as frequently as I despise it, I live in the real world, Joe. Bad shit happens to innocent people all the time here.
I saw a video with a military guy who said Charley would wear some body armor like Kevlar, but he also showed a metal chest plate that could also be used. It is this plate that jumps up and pushes out the shirt, and that could explain the letters moving.
But other than that—suspicious.
the black dot
he is whisked away in an SUV, not ambulance
the ridiculous story of the shooter disassembling his rifle, reassembling it, leaving it behind, carrying in his pants . Oswald patsy. Someone else did the kill shot. George Webb says entry was from behind his right ear and black dot is exit wound. Low impact quiet gun timed to go with the rifle shot, …
Another false flag
Hi philalethes,
it would be a prudent precaution, if one was concerned about ‘transgender shooters’, to wear some sort of body armor, but as this photo shows, he wasn’t:
https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2025/09/1200/675/charlie-kirk-witness-accounts.png?ve=1&tl=1
“the ridiculous story of the shooter disassembling his rifle, reassembling it, leaving it behind, carrying in his pants .”
Yep, unbelievable. Literally.
I find that image inconclusive. Here’s the link to channel to Paramount Tactical
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6zPjo5Vogc&t=537s
I see the same angle shot of Charley’s teeshirt in the video; this is a guy well versed in these issues. It seemed plausible to him there could be body armor.
His perflexed and distraught Daily Wire friend-name escapes me- said that Charlie told him he wore body armor in lieu of feeling at risk by fear of Israel killing him.
Graeme, please cease and desist immediately with the racial epithets. I’m removing every post where you’ve used the N-word, it’s wholly uncalled for and plays right into the divide-and-conquer game.
Whatever, just don’t use the term here, it’s not welcome.
Graeme,
Are you a genuine nutter, or just a spook doing the angry zealot gig?
For your edification, ‘WHATEVER” is not a racist nor an explicit term, grab a dictionary and confirm for yourself.
Secondly, I’ve REPEATEDLY attacked Jewish supremacists and Zionists on this Substack for their rampant pedicide and their pedo-protecting ways.
While you effectively discredit skeptics of the official narrative by acting like a deranged angry loon, I research and write evidence-based articles highlighting the evil behavior of Israel, Zionists and Jewish supremacists.
I think it’s time for you to go elsewhere Graeme, I don’t like your tone and I’m suspicious of your motives.
I like your argument of I’m not going to watch the video because the shooting is fake. Apparently Mr Kirk was quite large 6’3” and all rifle plates are limited in size. Nipples are far outboard and basically no rifle plate would be nipple to nipple on him. A peripheral hit like that would be no joke but fairly survivable.
Exit wounds are typically extremely large for rifle rounds. Even handgun rounds will stretch the tissue and leave stellate wounds.
People do not behave at all like in the movies when shot or wounded. Kirk showed clear signs of severe CNS injury. So he’d have to be an excellent actor.
Most of the video anomalies are due to compression. I doubt the high resolution video will be released ever, so all we have to go on is cell phone footage and they compress the hell out of video to save space. Then you upload it and it gets compressed some more.
How could he be wearing body armor when the outline of his nipple is visible?
As someone who spent my life in the Propaganda Industry I can tell you that looks like a remote controlled blood squib to me…
Watch the slomo footage. Ask yourself why you see his Tshirt puff up and cover his neck seconds before you see blood spewing out like a fountain?
[Do ya know how remote blood squibs work in Hollywood productions to make it look like someone was shot?]
https://squibfx.com/air-squibs-that-create-realistic-bullet-hit-effects-squib-fx/REMOTE-CONTROL-TRIGGER-p110405288
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=llyOFscMTEs
Watch this starting at 6:00 and see the Hollywood effects segment where they demonstrate a neck shot blood squib.
DON’T BE FOOLED! THEY KILLED THE CHARACTER CHARLIE KIRK BUT THE ACTOR’S STILL ALIVE!
https://rumble.com/v6ysuki-dont-be-fooled-they-killed-the-character-charlie-kirk-but-the-actors-still-.html
At first glance, it looks real But once I watched the slow Mo footage and saw his shirt puff up right before the blood started spurting, I realized that is the hallmark of a pneumatic remote activated blood squib
Bullets don’t do that
This is what it looks like to get hit with a 30 06 bullet
I don’t believe the injuries we saw on TV are consistent with the reality…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWrXWS-tNVs
https://www.facebook.com/H.W.Saive/videos/809385298272847/
I find every imagine and video I’ve seen inconclusive. I find them perplexing for sure, but definitely not in any case conclusive. Even in the best case a video or imagine can’t really be conclusive by itself. They can help to build a conclusion though when added to corroborating information.
As you said about the ludicrous rifle story, this case is filled with suspicious information. With additional information that keeps getting more and more absurd.
Like the supposed “text messages” that sounds exactly like really bad script writing, filled with unrealistic exposition. Text that magically fits in every fbi plot point. That strongly points to a cover up by so-called deep state players.
So the question I’m focused on is who are they covering for?
There would be a lot more blood and they apparently didn’t do any “cleanup”.
As a people prone to conspiracy theories, I’d wait for more facts before I’d believe this. But that’s just me – a Canadian.
The video that I have watch it really closely to the guy right next to Charlie on the right he’s got his arms folded with his hand in his armpit and something in his hand as soon as Charlie is shot his arms go down and you can see something shiny in his hand and he put it in his pocket
Hi Anthony, I think we normally agree on almost everything (at least that you have written about and I have read). I also normally agree with Mr E. While I agree that this whole thing totally stinks to the heavens, I am a little confused as to whether this was all AI, or just some AI. Letters on T shirts and body parts disappearing, rings moving fingers; these all point to AI. But AI wouldn’t need to use a squib line or make CK move like he’s squeezing a bagpipe to move blood up a tube to squirt everywhere (except over his tshirt). We are now in the world where anyone can manipulate anything on film, and while I still feel I can place my trust in certain individuals, the same cannot be said for the virtual celluloid anymore. Your thoughts would be appreciated. Cheers
Hi Rob,
it may be that he was fitted with a blood squib, but the results weren’t satisfactory, so in came the computer-generated imagery?
There was clearly something weird going on with the shirt, bullets don’t cause a twister-style air current around them upon impact…
We certainly observed a lot of masking watching Biden and the other Bidens.
Watch this starting at 6:00 and see the Hollywood effects segment where they demonstrate a neck shot blood squib.
https://rumble.com/v6ysuki-dont-be-fooled-they-killed-the-character-charlie-kirk-but-the-actors-still-.html
Anthony & Rob, food for thought: I did real an explanation about how cell phones can’t replay frame by frame so the images can appear jumpy. ie the microphone magnetic jumps, the blood moves down and up… (?)
This is interesting and is very much what I am taking about. Like I say, I have no doubt we were somehow watching a pantomime, but the detail is still fuzzy to me
Thanks Anthony, yes, something totally weird all over the place. I actually think the aftermath and lack forensic preservation and emergency crew speak even louder than the film, as these are cold hard facts.
i think these anomalies are put there on purpose to keep this insane discussion going for decades. questions that can never be answered just result in everyone getting all wound up and wasting their precious time ruminating ad nauseum on this production
So Anthony, are you saying that Charlie Kirk is NOT DEAD?
If he’s dead, it certainly wasn’t from the B-grade circus that they’re trying to pass off as his ‘assassination’.
Is he enjoying the psy-op version of Witness Protection, or was he Jack Ruby’d?
I don’t know. I only know that everything about the official tale is a complete and utter crock of shit.
Bingo!
Meet Bob.
Bob has nothing to contribute other than antagonism and juvenile emojis.
Bob has had plenty of opportunity to say something intelligent, but clearly prefers acting like a jackass.
Bye Bob.
You have to ask why they didn’t really assassinate him, given that it would have been a lot less trouble and a lot more “realistic.” And it’s not like they don’t have the technology to do a better job doctoring a video or experience with psy-ops either.
Too risky. Maybe he makes it. Maybe a real person gets shot. If “they” wanted him dead they could have gotten to him anytime they wanted to. He’s a person. I’m sure he gets coffee or goes to the market. Maybe he works out at a gym. There are numerous places they could have put a bullet in him. It was a staged event, crafted for maximum emotional effect with the goal of shutting off people’s brains. The trauma event paves the way for Patriot Act 2.0.
Yes, I get that it’s about maximum emotional effect, which is why they did it at a public event not while he was getting a latte. Otherwise it wouldn’t have the desired effect of further dividing left and right and getting people to willingly give up more freedom. But remember JFK? Doesn’t get more maximum emotional effect than that, does it?! I think you’re probably right about a real person getting shot though. They might accidentally kill a bystander who matters to someone with power.
“Charlie Kirk” isn’t a real person. He is/was a character playing a part in a theatre show. It appears that JFK was an actual assassination of a true (maybe the last) real political opponent who might have done some real good. Or maybe not.
What I do know is that their ops are getting more ridiculous and easier to spot. The issue is that most people are idiots.
You’re preaching to the choir, Van. But Charlie Kirk is just as “real” to the average person as JFK was. Yes they are getting easier to spot. Perhaps they enjoy laughing at us.
Interesting. Thanks.
Hi troll.
Then what is your answer?
Then obviously you don’t read the official narrative of any of these staged events. It also wouldn’t hurt to actually look at the video. A blind person would see it’s fake.
You are a Jew Barry
I see 3 narratives: lone gunman, lone gunman is patsy and Israel did it (see videos linking this to cell phone gun), or fake Hollywood production. Like with so many these events, we’re presented with an orgy of evidence for all of them really. Though a semi truck can poke holes in the mainstream narrative.
To what point? Is a humiliation ritual for us? Of course I see the means to push us more towards enslavement and all that, but they can do that without the theatrics and they have been for years.
I mean, the vast majority of people have absolutely no clue as to the role of government, civics, history, or otherwise and are more interested in the outcome of the game last night and the current temperature of their latte. And really, the symbolism is so thick with this one. Too bad Trump and Nutanyahoo missed the text time by 1 minute. 3:02, not as symbolic as 3:03.
I just simply want to know how a Christian gets into Valhalla and not Heaven?
code “302” is “involuntary” mental health issue
https://www.mainlinehealth.org/blog/understanding-the-302-process
here in Orange County they used federal “covid” funding to build a communicable health coordination complex including a BSL3 lab and a mental health facility on the abandoned El Toro Base
Yes, Nick. This leaves me with the last conundrum: what about the AUDIENCE and their experience. I e seen a few comments but I doubt we’ll get whàt were looking for.
It’s wise to let this Psyop go to stop the head-looping.
X
Interestingly… “REEDOM” = 33 in English Ordinal gematria…
great catch
Why does the video you are analyzing look like a claymation cartoon? The definition is so extremely poor that I would guess you have a fake video and not a video of the actual shooting.
That is the video that has been publicly released.
I’m guessing there is no video of the actual shooting because there was no actual shooting.
Here’s what it looks like when something more robust than Kirk gets shot from 200 yards with a 30-06 cartridge:
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/what-happens-when-you-shoot-something
Anthony, your comment made me laugh – it’s unbelievable as to how many people still believe this cowpat farce
Right, just another staged shooting hoax. No surprise.
The lack of delay in the gunshot sound and Ck’s reaction along with the lack of exploding neck getting hit with a “high powered round” is another dead give away.
I have seen deer hit in the throat with this size rifle round. It can leave a hole the size of your fist.
It’s definitely a strange video.
https://youtu.be/ltakvGyzfZs?si=XnLKtLfYMAojuJSo
If you look at that gentleman’s analysis, he’s a marine sniper
And watching Charlie Kirk with your own eyes, you can’t crisis actor that well being hit by a bullet and that tube you see is a wire for his microphone and earpiece. The microphone is clipped to his below his right shoulder and you can see the wire come up across his belly up to his chest you can see the wire over his shoulder and the earpiece come flying out
Charlie Kirk got shot from a guy to the right behind him. Turki was shot base of the skull around the ear exit wound left of the esophagus.
Nice to see you get it!
If you know about the Horst Wessel construct, you will see the correlation between the two and how this plays out in the current timeline
Look very carefully at the photos of them. I do suspect they are “related”.
There are scores of these familial coincidences if you look at all of the lead players in this operation
It’s the theater of war, and the same tribe is still playing all of the lead roles
Patel said he would see Charlie in Valhalla. This is not some esoteric mumbo jumbo. It’s a hint in plain sight.
Valhalla is in Agard. Asgard is a N@zi base in Antartica that many fled to when they feigned to lose the war.
They rebranded and changed costumes. Now their kids are ruling the world.
Charlie is to the 4th Reich what Horst Wessel was for the 3rd, as history repeats…
https://www.reddit.com/r/oldmaps/comments/kqrt1d/nazi_map_of_asgard/#lightbox
These divisive entities have always been the part of the same turd. They just exist to divide and manipulate the masses, a strategy as old as civilisation. But it’s good that at least more people can see through the bs. And sad that so many still need to wake up. Also, gotta factor in the bots manipulating public perceptions on those big social media platforms.
I haven’t seen anything regarding the provenance of this video. Who made it? Is it from someone’s cellphone? Or is it entirely AI? As has been pointed out, with all the people there you would think there would be a plethora of videos.
So, let me get this straight. Someone allegedly gets shot in public, yet we don’t seem to have a crime scene, no investigation of the scene, victim removed from the scene. Who declared him dead. No autopsy, no coroner report, i.e., cause/manner of death. Maybe he had a heart attack or stroke. No murder weapon, no ballistic test because they have no bullet. I’m still waiting for some actual evidence. And what about all these Charley Kirk fans coming out of the ether basically proclaiming him the literal second coming?
Has anyone pointed out the guy in blue right to the right of CK (in the background when looking from CK’s left)? I’m sure it’s doctored, but it looks like he has a gun under his left armpit (held in his right hand) and then he just calmly walks backward after the h”shot” takes place. His reaction is totally bizarre, and it certainly looks like he had something there, as when he lowers his right arm down, there is a definitely glint of metal.
Bye bye troll.
Ladies and Gentlemen, seems we have gone full Zapruder Film.
The blood is too dark for me to believe it.
wherewhere were you able to actually see the blood?
Ok. Is this like when the official narrative that the 2020 “protests” were just “mostly peaceful protests”?
I get it now.
One thing that strikes me as MOST ODD is why we seem to have only this one blurry video of the incident. You can see people holding up phones to video the event..the internet should be teeming with uploads…have they all been taken down?
There must be hundreds of videos all with slightly different angles that anyone can post on YouTube. Where are they?
No
I was not a follower of Charlie Kirk’s, but I don’t believe you proved anything here. Being a Mason doesn’t mean you can’t be assassinated. Erika is a flat out tool and Charlie seemed to have been a groomed and well-funded asset for political influence, which definitely doesn’t make you immune to an assassination ,in fact, if you go off-script, which is what he has appeared to have done, you will definitely get assassinated. He may have believed in the message early on, but began to question the ethics of what he was actually promoting. There would be consequences for that if they couldn’t persuade him to get back on message.
The ballistic forensics support a bullet entered from just under and behind his right ear, forcing a concussion wave just ahead of the bullet that instantly destroyed the tissues at the base of the brain and throat, expanding the tissues on the bullets path as apparently the bullet creates a pocket as it enters (which would explain the hairline shifting in response to those dynamics as well as the shirt puffing up), and then exited at the left corodid artery at his lower left neck, slightly to the front. The exit wound appears evident to anyone seeing the video. The photographic anomalies (ring on one finger then another) could be part of frame rate and technical tampering at any point post event as no one here can verify the chain of custody with these video images. Let’s face it, no one here has likely to have shot a man and thus definitively know what it is supposed to look like on a video. We are all learning here, with the possible exception of a curious sniper who likes to read conspiratorial substack posts.
The wires under the shirt is a common way to comfortably wear an ear piece looping from the clamped mic at his right collar bone and around the belly to remove the tension of the weight of the wires. Wires that appear near the ear might not be evidence of a squib but the ear piece itself getting dislodged from the ear at impact.
“The ballistic forensics support a bullet entered from just under and behind his right ear…”
LOL. So you’re saying he was shot from BEHIND now?
His back was facing the tent LOL
“The exit wound appears evident to anyone seeing the video.”
The only wound evident in the video is the one in his neck.
Not sure what your true motive is, but I always get a bit suspicious when people say things like “I was not a follower of Charlie Kirk’s, but …”
The video is clearly CGI-altered and contains ridiculous anomalies, but you try to argue they are bonafide, organic occurrences.
No.
Oh, and your mythical ballistics report notwithstanding, here’s what it really looks like when a creature more robust than Charlie Kirk gets nailed with a .30-06 cartridge:
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/what-happens-when-you-shoot-something
Yes, the exit wound was visible, front left side of his neck. That is what I said.
I was being honest about not having been a follower of Mr.Kirk, nothing sinister about that. I believe he was paid very large sums of money to influence US politics from abroad. That isn’t OK in my book, but the truth about his assassination is highly important to understand. It was very clear that a very extensive network from Utah politicians, Campus authorities, event staff (at all levels) were informed and acted out the assassination.
I think we have multiple videos that have been altered, cross referencing them helps. I initially gave credence to the squib theory but have since felt that is inaccurate. Charlie died that day as he sat under that canopy for political expediency by a highly sophisticated network of people, both foreign and domestic.
“Yes, the exit wound was visible, front left side of his neck. That is what I said.”
See comment above. This is truly getting ridiculous. When your rationalizations are far more ridiculous than the ‘conspiracy theory’ you are trying to debunk, maybe its time to have a serious rethink on your position?
The bullet appears to have come from Charlie’s right side from a slightly elevated position. Very clear image of the shooter’s position showing the gun and the coordination by multiple individuals in theater.
“The bullet appears to have come from Charlie’s right side from a slightly elevated position.”
This mythical entry wound you are claiming is not visible. Therefore, as you originally stated, it must be positioned to the rear of his head – which is facing the back of the tent.
So if you are going to maintain this claim, you must also hold that he was shot from behind.
“Very clear image of the shooter’s position showing the gun and the coordination by multiple individuals in theater.”
The official tale clearly holds that he was shot from 200 yards by a sniper directly ahead but slightly to the left:
https://nypost.com/2025/09/11/us-news/charlie-kirk-shooters-exact-pov-apparently-revealed-in-chilling-new-photos-that-show-his-snipers-nest/
Yet you maintain the bullet did a half-circle round his head and entered behind his right ear?
Ugh.
No, the shooter was very near Charlie on his right side, not in front of Charlie. And from a slightly elevated position.
Great, can you please supply the footage?
If you get shot with a 30-06 you don’t get a quarter size exit wound. I’ve killed a lot of animals with a 30-06, the exit wound on a hide is usually the size of your fist. There should have been a 2500 foot per second spray of bone, tendon and flesh launching out of that “hole”. It’s not even close to real.
Don’t let the naysayers bother you.
Truth telling is a lonely vocation usually.
But, if you open even one other set of eyes, you’ve done yourself proud.
Thanks Mike, I appreciate the kind comment 🙂
I’d like to add Trump is NOT a Mason and the G alone means nothing!!
“I’d like to add Trump is NOT a Mason”
Right, he just repeatedly flashes Masonic imagery for the heck of it. Along with the rest of the parasite class.
I have a photo of myself making that masonic sign. I didn’t realise I was a mason. Thanks for the heads up.
No problem, always happy to help.
It is really amazing how you can use AI to edit videos.
Now let’s see where Candace Owens stands with her buddy outed as a fraud.
WTF. have you ever seen somebody actually physically shot with a high-powered rifle in the neck? I understand that all sorts of people wanna believe and all sorts of people wanna debunk, I don’t give a fuck about that. What I do give a fuck about is the fact that you are all reveling in it whether you think it’s good or you think it’s bad you’re still reveling. Get a fucking grip. The whole fucking scenario is off the fucking charts.
Most of your anomalies look like artifacts of low resolution digital images. The disappearance and reappearance of the F in Freedom seems utterly inconsequential.
Are you saying that Kirk faked his death and is going into hiding for the rest of his life? Does that seem like something he would do?
What about all the people who were eye witnesses? Are you saying they will be hunted down and silenced?
no one gives a damn stop talking about the POS
I understand there are many people out there commenting on some people’s analysis of Charlie’s assassination. Some think others are foolish and some think others are spot on. There are many peculiar oddities regarding the video coverage from mainly cell phones which appear strange. Some trained individuals such as Paramount Tactical has stated Charlie was wearing stealth armor and a slimmed down version of armor that is not the best to take a bullet. He advised that the bullet may have ricocheted off the beveled part of the armor, the bullet then fragmented from the impact, and then went to his throat/neck. Many have said the exit wound is supposed to be larger than the entry wound and I agree but in this case and IF THAT IS THE CASE then the bullet went into his skin fragmented and never exited. The bullet fragments went in and up to the cranial area. But then I wondered if that happened then why didn’t his head possibly expand or why didn’t the force come out someway or another?
On another note here is why everything seems so odd: I have seen close ups of the guys carrying Charlie to the SUV (no ambulance coverage – odd) and no blood trail unless they wrapped his neck up so tightly to put pressure on it but still that was a huge hole in his neck and a huge loss of blood, most likely there would be a trail because even the most advanced medical team leaves blood behind and does it all the time in the ER. Then after the shooting there was a journalist Adam Bartholomew that was allowed to film and clearly I might add of no one securing the crime scene immediately and being firm in no filming on top of no one immediately removing a camera in the tent or in the crowd nor in front of the tent. I didn’t see anyone crying or upset or distraught either. It was like okay we are done here now we can casually clean up and who cares about significant evidence lying around. This is so strange because I know Mr. Kirk made the money to pay for most likely top notch security and security guards in case of fights or death. Sure people can be in shock of the situation but usually there someone visually upset following the death of an individual and I didn’t see it. Then we see his wife post Kirk in an open casket, this is so strange and I wouldn’t air that out in public business. This should be a private occasion and I would think his neck is so severed from the bullet wound I would think the mortician would have suggested a closed casket.
There is so much more that is questionable like what you mentioned in the video, crime scene issues, no ambulance, team of guys carrying should have not picked him up because most medics know that you can do more damage to a person if you move them improperly and they picked him up so quickly and put him in a SUV with no straps or safety belts to keep him in place. Why in the world was an ambulance not called and heavy police presence on the scene immediately? We are talking about a university with tons of people and potential for threats all over when Kirk does these events. No blood on back of tent either, the blood just went to the side.
I would just love to have some clear closure on this whole episode because something just seems really off about this one.
I have medical experience so I used what I know to describe why some of this doesn’t make sense. I have worked in the ER and many other departments of a hospital. I have seen many deceased bodies as well from onset to a couple of days and open casket funerals. I have treated wounds including myself bleeding heavily from accidental cuts. Blood naturally falls onto the skin and all over the place, it is very messy and will stain.
Where was the clean up crew?
What a tool LOL
Thanks to :yulia for sending me here. I did this one on it, which also looks at the Mr E video and the Bibi Killed Kirk hypothesis, along with a few others: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/charlie-kirk-psyop
Good thing videos are immune from alteration!
Skepticism works in both directions – believe everything and nothing.
With old tech video, it was important to understand that each frame takes the shutter speed of the camera to expose – so even when exposed at 1000th of a second it actually took maybe 1/125th or 1/75th of a second from one side of the frame to the other – so if you stopped frames you would see anomalies such as bending limbs.
Not an expert on new tech video but each frame is being taken over a time period, during which time some movement of the image is taking place if it isn’t still. Some image software is applied by the camera smarts to minimise the camera shake – so we shouldn’t be surprised that there are anomalies – not saying we shouldn’t question them, just that it needs expertise to properly do so.
Don’t take the images as gospel. Take a dummy, put a shirt on it and video that (with multi phones on different settings) whilst shooting it, then compare the various anomalies before making conclusions.
It seems to me from reactions of people, including close friends of his, that Charlie was killed – ipso facto the anomalies may simply be video artifacts.
Prove he is alive and I’ll believe you. Meanwhile I’ll entertain the possibility it was faked but that’s it.
There must be other videos. Wondering if someone will come forward with it.
So sad how you want desperately to believe a possible conspiracy over what actually happened.
What actually happened was an obviously fake, pre-orchestrated psychological operation. However, if you think you can post a coherent rebuttal to the growing list of anomalies evident in this complete farce, go ahead.
Oh lord lol
Ridiculous. God I am so thankful that I don’t follow conspiracy theorist’s.
Yes, it’s so ridiculous that you can’t even begin to field anything resembling a rebuttal, just a cheap shot at the messenger to soothe that rumbling voice deep inside you letting you know you’ve been conned.
Brother, if you really believe this, I’ve got some beachfront property in Idaho to sell you.
Wackka wackka
Is this a blast effect?
The hand positions seem deliberate and don’t look natural on some of the people doing it. Something weird going on.
What in the hell is the point? What are you suggesting?
He allegedly said he feared the mafia from The Only Democracy In
The ME might murder him, so he staged his own murder…
Since then he’s been spotted sunning himself with martini in hand on
foreign beaches… My neighbours swears CK was seen sunning himself
on a Sydney beach two days ago, drinking a can of our local (World
Famous) beer – an improvement over ‘martinis’… He has A Few Million
in the bank, must be gonna send for the wife and kid to join him when
World Interest dies down ??
This crap is just a mechanical hare
You ought to put the pipe down. You’re toast.
Non sense, he had a body armor. So what is your guess if it is fake ? he is somewhere on an island with Epstein?
The number of faked deaths does give one pause with regard to where on earth all the people go but the thing is the fakers don’t have to go to islands, in fact, they don’t even have to change their name or have plastic surgery or really do anything at all, they can just keep on as they are and deny they’re the person who allegedly died, eg, the alleged Challenger disaster astronauts. The limitlessness of the Emperor’s New Clothes world we live in is difficult to comprehend.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/the-challenger-disaster-the-plot
Yes, sure, he is gonna leave 2 young kids he loves and a pregnant wife. To believe that you have to be an atheist.
If all you’ve got is an ad hominem attack you haven’t got anything so why bother?
Release the Epstein Files.
OMG
Maybe they faked his death and he’s going to be “resurrected” soon …
May I ask what the specs were for that video file? Did you increase the size of the image or alter the video in any way? Because I don’t believe a word of what you presented.
I was a non-linear video editor for over 10 years. I understand the forensics of digital editing, as well as codecs, compression, wrappers, and a bunch of other boring technical stuff. However, all I’m seeing are digital artifacts. If you’re trying to say the video was produced or enhanced by Artificial Intelligence, get another video. There’s probably one from everyone that attended the event.
I’m more concerned about the obstruction of justice and nonchalant tampering with evidence at the crime scene by Turning Point USA staff.
Oh yeah, the Freemasons. They invented baseball you know.
What detail? He got shot in his fucking neck end of story by a maga Mormon
The “tubing” under his shirt is the wire going from the clip attached to the front of the shirt, which is attached to his earpiece. He also had body armor over his chest.
Staged made up fabricated under the Putin 101 handbook on how to become a dictator and say a dictator you kill your citizens and you sacrifice them that’s what he’s done Trump was never shot and Trump had Charlie shot
The blood wasn’t clearly added in you don’t know this, but there’s a lot of strange shit no doubt
Hey Anthony, thank you for your thoughtful analyses of this insane event. I’m curious to know if you’ve seen other shooting victims, either during service or while hunting or street violence? Not saying this to call you out or belittle you. I’ve seen videos of slo-mo gunshot wounds, and was really surprised by how much the body responds with sometimes seizure like movements. I was also surprised at the odd way clothing responded to the shock of the bullet. Almost like the fabric was buffeted around due to the impact of the shot. I’ve no idea why the lower face disappears, but the change in hair line may be due to his head snapping forward and, throwing his hair over his fore head. Last observation, the blood that comes from the would area looks like genuine arterial spurt. There’s a great deal of pressure behind the blood. Arteries tend to send out an almost column of blood, and what looks like receding could be the artery relaxing and then contracting again. The spurting of blood did come out evenly spaced, looking to be in the same rhythm of an heart beat or pulse.
Again, please understand I’m not criticizing your evaluation at all! You did a pretty complete job. These were just observations i had. I am no fan of C.K., i just have a curious mind. (I am now going to see if i can find any slo-mo vids that would give me another perspective. Not of C.K. Video, just random). Be safe.
Also if you notice the word freedom on the shirt the f word disappears and then reappears something’s just not right about this whole thing and it’s like so much happening these days
Also if you notice the word freedom on the shirt the f word disappears and then reappears something’s just not right about this whole thing and it’s like so much happening these days
Also if you notice the word freedom on the shirt the f word disappears and then reappears something’s just not right about this whole thing and it’s like so much happening these days
Also if you notice the word freedom on the shirt the f word disappears and then reappears something’s just not right about this whole thing and it’s like so much happening these days
Also if you notice the word freedom on the shirt the f word disappears and then reappears something’s just not right about this whole thing and it’s like so much happening these days
I just find it kind of weird how the word freedom on the shirt all of a sudden the f disappears and then comes back. Plus when they carried him to the car there’s two different video angles one following him cuz somebody had their phone camera. To a camera from the building facing those cars that they took them to. And if you notice there was no blood dripping to the car or dripping off his body the blood on his arm look very nonchalant like as if somebody spilled juice on you
The anomalies in the video you are trying to find meaning in are anomalies that happen from stepping through frame by frame video recorded at normal speed. Normal speed is either 24 or 30 frames per second. Then factor in the shutter speed of the camera which is 1/50 or 1/60 of a second.
So when stepping through an action like a bullet going through cloth and flesh, that takes maybe 1/8 of a second, you have possibly 3 to 3.75 frames that capture the movement.
Stepping through frame by frame actually reveals more missing information the actual information. Add to this that the slow shutter speed allows very fast motion to be blurred. This is what your analysis shows and flaws your conclusions.
If this same event were shot in slow motion, ie a high frame rate, stepping through the 1/8 second event now gives you 15 frames of information to analyze. Add to this that filming at a higher frame rate typically increases the shutter speed which ‘freezes’ the action in each frame. That in turn produces a clearer, crisper image. This method gives a more accurate rendition for analysis than the what you’re using.
In addition to your assertion that this is ‘fake’ or staged, I and others want to know what you think the true outcome was. Are you saying Kirk is not dead? If not, where is he? If not dead will he live a life in captivity somewhere? To what purpose?
It’s a wild premise. Not thought through and exposited to my satisfaction. Nor many others who are trying to understand the point of the counter narrative you are promoting.
Yawn. You trolls sure are boring.
Why is the video in black and white? This wasn’t a high speed camera, it was a cell phone from how far away? Fast movement is going to blur. It’s funny you mention all the hand signs but completely miss the guy behind them who looks like he actually shot the gun. So if we take this evidence, that he was shot from the right side, his shirt bouncing up like that makes sense. It’s following the trajectory of the bullet. I don’t think he’s alive. But I don’t think Tyler Robinson killed him.
Isn’t this exactly what disinformation is?
The ring is a magicians ring with a hinge. That mush has been explained away, as he was always fiddling with it evidence by many other videos from long before this one.
It was to hit his ear but the f up
Bottom line in all of these conspiracies is that I put no faith in man to tell the truth. The bible foretold the end and how we should NEVER EVER accept the MARK OF THE BEAST. I do believe we are in the last days. I do believe those of us who refuse the Mark will be banned from everything. We will be punished and starved and killed. The anti-Christ whether the POPE, Islam or AI or a living person is the enemy of GOD. Fear is your worst enemy. GOD will make a way for those who refuse the mark. Heaven is the ultimate home. God bless and HAVE FAITH in him!
The film he presents here is clearly doctored by him to prove a point that makes no sense… If anyone is trying to convince you of a fraud it is this guy and his doctored film. The verdict is still out on WHO killed Kirk. I dont believe it was the kid. More likely an inside hit job and plenty of evidence that Israelis security team had him assassinated. Could have been a power grab by his own team. Who knows? Only GOD
Where, in your theory, would Kirk be now?
So are you saying people in the audience saw this…ridiculous
Look into the lossy nature of digital encoding techniques.