Is it because you couldn't "adjust" the data enough to make your garbage drug look even remotely safe and effective?
It’s worse than we thought.
A week ago, I wrote about the farcical Pfizer paper recently published in the New World Order Journal of Medicine (aka NEJM). That paper laughably claimed the Pfizer Cartel’s new mRNA influenza ‘vaccine’ was more effective than the ineffective regular flu vaccine.
A look at the results showed no meaningful differences in “influenza-like illness” or “laboratory-confirmed influenza” between groups, yet a far higher rate of adverse effects in the mRNA group.
In other words, Pfizer’s new flu shot sucks.
And so does NEJM for publishing this garbage - their peer review process is evidently looser than an Only Fans creator.
But guess what?
There’s more.
A reader recently alerted me to the fact that Pfizer and NEJM hid the data for trial participants that were 65 and over.
This was news to me, because the NEJM paper made no mention whatsoever of such a demographic; it simply stated the trial participants were “healthy adults between the ages of 18 and 64 years.”
This kind reader provided a link to a Substack article by Australian journalist Maryanne Demasi, which states “Pfizer’s mRNA flu shot failed in the over-65s, but the New England Journal of Medicine never published the data.”
I started reading Demasi’s article, but promptly ran into a wall. More precisely, a paywall. Not to worry, I quickly got my sleuth on and retrieved the damning data.
Because I’m feeling generous, and because my disgust at the hijos de putas at el cártel Pfizer knows no bounds, I’ll share what transpired with readers for free.
De nada.
The Retired Demographic Whose Data Was Conveniently Retired
Upon learning Pfizer deleted an entire demographic from its recent trial report, the A-Train went into express mode, toot-tooted like Thomas the Tank, and raced towards two key destinations.
One was the study protocol. I scanned through it, brows furrowed like Tucker Carlson trying to read the small print on a packet of vapes.
When the A-Train pulled up to page 59 of the protocol, his eyes popped wide.
His blood pressure began to rise, and instead of going “toot toot!”, he started spewing naughty words like an old Italian man trying to fix something that doesn’t want to be fixed.
“Mannaggia la miseria brutti sporchi bastardi maledetti figli di puttana disagraziati!”
In English: Pfizer are really horrible.
No, I didn’t forget punctuation above, this is how old Italian men really curse. Once they start swearing, commas cease to exist and they suddenly develop the Vo2max of young elite athletes, able to churn out profanity after profanity without needing to breathe. It’s quite a sight to behold.
But I digress.
Here’s the table on page 59 of the protocol that was published along with the main paper at NEJM, describing the study interventions.
For reasons unknown, the mRNA vaccine dose for those ≥65 has been redacted.
Got something to hide, Pfizer?
Silly question.
The next mention of participants ≥65 years is on page 97, where we learn the “primary efficacy objectives of this study are to evaluate the noninferiority and superiority” of Pfizer’s mRNA ‘vaccine’ “in each age stratum (participants 18 through 64 and ≥65 years of age) independently.”
So it was a primary objective of the study to see how well Pfizer’s new flu shot performed among the 18-64 and ≥65 demographics. Yet when it came time to publish the main paper in NEJM, the second demographic was simply erased from history.
But wait, it gets worse.
Next Stop, ClinicalTrials.gov, Toot Toot!
US Federal law requires Phase 2 and 3 drug intervention trials conducted in the US or US territories and/or for the purpose of gaining an NDA and/or involving a drug manufactured in the US for export to be registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.
CT.gov can make for interesting reading because sometimes the posted results tell a different story to the ones eventually published in journals. Sometimes, the results are never published in journals because they are too embarrassing.
Of course, far fewer people read CT.gov than the journals. Which is great news for drug companies with something to hide.
The CT.gov page for the Pfizer mRNA flu shot trial can be found here.
Of participants in the 18-64 category, the NEJM paper states “9225 [were] assigned to the modRNA group and 9251 assigned to the control group”.
The CT.gov information also shows 9,251 starters for the control group which wasn’t really a control group because they also took a vaccine, so they were in fact a comparator drug group.
But hey, what’s a little obfuscative language between friends?
However, it shows 9,247 starters in the mRNA group, which means by the time the NEJM paper was published some 22 participants in that group had vanished. Was their data conveniently omitted because it didn’t show what Pfizer wanted it to show?
The unexplained disappearance of 22 participants - enough to sway the results given the pathetically miniscule differences Pfizer seized upon to claim efficacy for their new mRNA mierda - is already sketchy.
But omitting the data for 27,270 participants is truly astounding.
That’s right ladies, gentlemen, they/thems, furries, people identifying as asexual zucchinis and anyone else I’ve left out:
By pretending the ≥65 cohort never existed, the hijos de putas at el cártel Pfizer omitted the data for a whopping 13,635 folks taking their mRNA porqueria, and 13,635 folks injected with regular anti-flu goo!
Not only is this repugnant behavior by Pfizer, it also confirms NEJM is a complete joke.
The job of the peer-reviewers at this so-called ‘prestigious’ journal is to, well, review the bloody paper.
That means cross-checking stuff. Like comparing the protocol with the published paper, and when you notice that almost thirty thousand participants have mysteriously been deleted from the latter, pull out a red marker and write across the submitted paper:
“Che cazzo fai?!? Over 27,000 participants missing?!? Where the [BLEEP] did they all go??? You didn’t think I’d notice?? What do you think I am, a [BLEEP] cuccio? Mannaggia la miseria brutti sporchi bastardi maledetti figli di puttana disagraziati!”
But the peer reviewers at NEJM clearly aren’t feisty old Italian blokes. Nope, they probably belong to some other demographic, like maybe an apron-wearing cult that meets at lodges and is controlled by a powerful cabal of deviants who occasionally remind those under their control that curiosity killed the whistleblower and that handsome financial remuneration and suppression of embarrassing personal information comes the way of those who do as they are told.
But I digress.
As you might imagine, when a criminally dishonest drug company suddenly ‘forgets’ about 27,000+ clinical trial participants, there’s got to be a reason.
When the Data Doesn’t Support Your Drug, Delete It
The data show that among those ≥65, during the first 7 days the mRNA group suffered a higher rate of local and systemic adverse events. But when making results public, Pfizer and their government buddies simply pretend the first 14 days didn’t happen; all the unfavorable outcomes and adverse events of that period simply get sucked into a time vortex, never to be reported on again.
So let’s move onto the AE results for the first 4 weeks.
They show that 8.7% of the mRNA group suffered adverse events, compared to 5.9% in the regular flu goo group.
The corresponding figures for serious adverse events were 2.3% and 2.2%, respectively.
As for ‘efficacy’, 0.34% of the mRNA group and and 0.36% of the regular flu vax group got “laboratory-confirmed influenza” (defined as influenza infection confirmed through RT-PCR or culture at the central laboratory) from day 15 onwards. This was lab-confirmed influenza associated with an “influenza-like illness” (ILI), the ILI being diagnosed according to Pfizer’s criteria.
In other words, there was no difference between groups.
The CT.gov report then shows the percentage of participants in each group who had lab-confirmed influenza associated with influenza-like illness, when the ILI was diagnosed according to CDC (0.36% vs 0.30%) and WHO (0.23% vs 0.22%) guidelines.
So in the ≥65 participants, the results showed the mRNA concoction was no better than a regular (and ineffective) influenza vaccine, yet produced a higher rate of adverse events.
That’s what is known as a FAIL. A drug that doesn’t work yet produces higher rates of side effects is a stinker. A flop.
Well done, NEJM for being either hopelessly incompetent or complicit and allowing the deceitful, incompletely-reported Pfizer trial into print.
It’s becoming a habit, isn’t it?
Remember that absurd slop you published in January 2020 announcing the alleged isolation of ‘Sars-Cov-2’, the new Woohoo virus that was allegedly racing around the world killing people left, right and centre, but in reality did not exist?
You published a paper that made zero sense, and for which not one of the authors was prepared to list themselves as a contact to field inquiries, which is standard practice.
When I twice contacted three (3) of those Chinese researchers to ask about the long list of anomalies in their paper, I was greeted by a Great Wall of Silence.
And you call yourself a peer-reviewed journal!
As for Pfizer, it should’ve been disbanded long ago. This corporate criminal has been wantonly breaking the law ever since the 1950s, racking up violation after violation.
As I’ve written previously, if Pfizer was named after an Italian family instead of a German immigrant, and had employees with names like Big Paulie, Little Angie and Fat Tony, it would be labelled a criminal organization and prosecuted under the RICO Act. Its members would be arrested and given lengthy prison sentences.
But because Pfizer is a key cog in the globalist wheel, and a huge contributor to the inaugurations of Bubba/Bibi-blowing US presidents, it keeps getting token slaps on the wrist and is allowed to carry on as usual.
Got to take charge and stay away from these jabs. Shot of any kind.
I am so honored to be THAT person who wrote a comment in your previous blog providing you with a link to Dr. Maryanne Demasi’s Subtack. She consistently covers (and breaks!) big stories. She was previously a host of a news show on the Australian Broadcast Company’s channel…but obviously, she doesn’t follow “the narrative” too well and asks (and finds!) good questions, even great ones!
https://substack.com/@maryannedemasi
I dunno, paisan. Maybe all this stuff is to create some realism, a bit like when they point to anomalies in their own false flags so we treat an event as real and get bogged down in details. As with Chi-nah and lab leaks. As when the dickheads simply blew a hole in their Pentagon and got us debating whether it was a plane or a missile. As when Katy opened the flappy door of the space-whatsie and made Jeff angry ’cause he was supposed to open it, so the whole silly stunt was lent a slight realism, looked less controlled.
Flu as defined doesn’t exist (sickness, however, does exist…oh, how it exists!). So maybe these vaccines don’t exist. They can shoot you with any old toxic gunk or just saline. I know it’s a stretch, but why not just make a big show of testing, invent some controversies, failures, scandals etc, get Tucker to go all truthie on the elites? If most highly educated people still believe in rocket ships…why not?
Or maybe they really do believe that invisible wrigglies are jumping from person to person and that they can invent some invisible spikies to munch up the wrigglies. But, hombre, that’s a lot of belief!
So why did President Trump appoint the Lobbyist for Pfizer to be the White House Chief of Staff?!??
About Trump (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/about-trump
Here is the truth – as hard as it may be to accept.
The injections are/were ‘bio tech’ – which allows for remote connection to your biology, for tracking, and all manner of other functions.
When injected, its delivered along with adjuvants, such as SV40, to suppress immune response.
Unfortunately, side effects include turbo cancers and other issues, but its hard to separate ‘features’ from ‘side effects’..
There are many names for this bio tech, such as ‘WBAN’, ‘internet of bodies’, ‘bio-cyber interface’, ‘remote neural monitoring’, etc.
At its worst, it facilitates ‘Havana syndrome’ and the selctive targeting of individuals, groups, or populations, by deep state actors/intelligence/secret societies, such as the Freemasons.
It’s a 2-part system, that interfaces with a network that covers the entire world – likely via haarp or Gwen style ELF networks, which have global coverage.
It can remain dormant, or can be activated, if you are considered by those in power, an issue.
Those in power can be corporate, intelligence, or other connected persons, and you wouldn’t necessarilyr recogniste them walking down the street.
Here’s some basic stuff to google:
Dr Robert Duncan (deceased)
Dr James Giordano (expert in neuroweapons)
‘Havana syndrome’
‘Targeted individuals’
Even if you are unvaccinated, you can be innoculated with this bio tech in a simple dentist, hospital visit or select medications.
Sad world we live in.
Thank You for looking at what was really offered in publication. At 69, You can be sure I will never have another jab – I haven’t had one since the tetanus shot (that gave Me tinnitus) when I was about 24, and I will give very high probability that was the best choice I have made!
I do not grasp the Ones who still think jabbing toxins into Their flesh is a solution to a seasonal detox. SMH!
Great article, I learnt some more Italian swear words today. Goodness, in an age where so many health freedom accounts are turning to AI to generate their articles – Lies Are Unbekoming, Medicine Girl, esc, to name a few – original writings like yours will be a premium product!
Pfizer has been making data disappear since the birth of Jesus. This BMJ editorial by Peter Doshi should’ve woken everyone up in January 2021 (!!) but sadly people were fast asleep – also talks about the “disappearance” of 371 trial participants, that could’ve swayed the results: https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/01/04/peter-doshi-pfizer-and-modernas-95-effective-vaccines-we-need-more-details-and-the-raw-data/
Thank you for confirming yet again that, like puppeticians, when a drug company opens its mouth, publishes papers, makes a press release etc, it’s lying.
They have to lie because the entire concept of “viruses causing illnesses” & “such illnesses are contagious” are both lies.
If either was a lie, the concept of “vaccination” as a so-called public health measure, would make no sense.
With BOTH being a lie, well, the entire concept is a dirty great evil lie, which has as ongoing objective to create a rationale to inject all manner of injurious materials into babies, children, adults, pregnant women and indeed any living thing with a pulse that can be held down long enough.
That’s what all vaccines are. Poisonous injections based on several lies.
If you still believe the propaganda about necessary, safe & effective, knock yourself out.
The fact that there are still no hats on the ground with all the evidence that’s already come out about the covid scam tells you all you need to know about how deep the infection has drilled into society’s mind.
The global cabal military industrial complex of which the big Pharma scum are part, has full control and as MTG recently said when she left office there’s no good guys fighting for us and no one is coming to the rescue
Thank you Anthony. You are the TGV of getting to the bottom of this fraud.
Nope all here in this ditty
https://rumble.com/v707gjk-pfizers-own-data-revealed.html?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_upp_a