Seriously, is that the best you've got? LOL
A few days ago, I posted a most unforgiving dissection of an article that claimed no-virus proponents were “probably” part of a “PSYOP”.
That article, peppered with F-bombs and describing virus skeptics as “deniers” and annoying cultists, was authored by a guy called Markus Mutscheller.
Judging by what he wrote, and his subsequent behavior, Mutscheller is clearly a few nuggets short of a KFC Feast.
He also has no clue what he’s talking about.
Markus made a point of feigning nonchalance and simultaneously trying to insult me after showing up in my notes and comments section. The exchange can be found here, and as you can see, I’m not impressed nor interested in Mutscheller’s antagonism. It’s clear I’ve gotten under his skin, but that’s something he needs to deal with on his own time.
What I’m interested in is exactly how Mutscheller arrived at his thesis that no-virus proponents like myself are “probably” a “PSYOP”?
I’m also curious as to why he calls us “deniers” when it is clear he has absolutely no knowledge of the research in this field?
Mutscheller was very forceful and adamant when publicly expressing these claims, so surely he must have some pretty compelling evidence to back them up, right?
Well, if he did, he forgot to include it in his article.
So, in the exchange that followed, I’ve repeatedly and patiently asked Mutscheller if he could supply the evidence. I think I’ve made it abundantly clear I’m not swayed by insults and feigned bravado, that what I’m really interested in is evidence.
I keep asking Mutscheller for the evidence that indicates yours truly, or any other no-virus proponent, is part of a “PSYOP”.
And he keeps failing to provide it.
Instead of supplying this evidence, which if conclusive would be a huge slam dunk for him, Mutscheller stubbornly sticks to the same failed formula. He keeps trying to antagonize me with a mix of insults and a passive-aggressive campaign of feigned concern.
What we all want is the evidence he should already have had at hand before vomiting the contents of his brain all over the screen in a deranged rant that made patently false accusations about virus skeptics.
But Mutscheller just keeps serving up the butt-hurt.
Which don’t impress me much.
When people try to get under your skin, and see their efforts failing, they will often escalate their behavior.
So it is with Markus.
In his initial response, he asked if I was Italian. That I was of Italian heritage should have been readily obvious from what I wrote in the article, but Markus clearly isn’t the quickest cab off the rank. So I confirmed my DNA was fully imported from Italy, then asked how that was even remotely relevant to the matter at hand.
Well, Markus wasn’t going to let it go. He clearly doesn’t like ‘foreigners’, even the ones born in Australia.
So this is what it comes to when you challenge people who falsely accuse you of being a “denier” and “probably” part of a “PSYOP”.
They get increasingly angered by your dismissal of their pithy snipes and your unwavering insistence on seeing the evidence. They get frustrated. In Mutscheller’s case, they get so frustrated that they jointly insult the size of your testicles (didn’t know you were looking Markus, might want to get your eyesight checked for micropsia) and they have a crack at insulting your ethnic background.
An “Italian spaghetti machine”?
WTF?
LOL.
You are a massive FAIL, Markus.
I already told you whether one’s background is Mediterranean or Mongolian has no bearing on the facts. But you just couldn’t help yourself, could you?
Silly little grub that you are.
Speaking of trolls, many of you will be familiar with someone who jumped to Mutscheller’s aid, and proved herself to be an utter troll.
Yep, Sasha Latypova appeared unannounced and unprovoked in my notes, criticizing me for criticizing Mutscheller’s writing style while simultaneously criticizing my writing. She declared she didn’t subscribe to my Substack because she didn’t like it, even though she was subscribed to my Substack and had liked numerous of my articles.
She accuses me of doing all the things Mutscheller and her are doing, and employs the same terribly unconvincing passive-aggressive shtick.
As with Mutscheller, I keep asking Latypova to stick to the topic and supply the evidence showing his criticisms to be on point. As with Mutscheller, she keeps failing to do so, but persists with the antagonism.
This is known as trolling.
Which begs the obvious question: What is her motive?
Mutscheller is clearly suffering a supersized case of butt-hurt, but why is Latypova so insistent on antagonizing me when neither her nor Markus can even begin to field a response of actual substance?
What’s your gig, Sasha? After all, you’re the last person fit to be lecturing others on civility. In addition to showing yourself to be an exceedingly hypocritical pest, wasn’t it your daughter who was investigated several years back for threatening to kill the CEO of Google?
Maybe get your own house in order before piously lecturing others on civil conduct?
Her daughter’s threat was just a “joke”, apparently. Like the time she caused a stink by criticizing Islam. Okay, so no institution is beyond criticism, including religion.
But while criticizing theologies emanating from the Middle East, why didn’t she jointly criticize the one whose adherents delight in land theft and killing children?
Asking for a friend.
Ladies and gentlemen, I think it’s fair to say we can safely flush the “No-Virus is a PSYOP!” claim down the toilet.
And to my fellow virus skeptics, if the best our critics can do is racially-charged criticism of our kitchen appliances, I think we’re on pretty safe ground.
Anyhow, have some pasta fagioli,
ciao,
Anthony.
PsyOp … seems to be loosely applied by the deep left mask gang, without maybe? A clue as to its true Globo/Socialist Left wing origins
There is zero logic to the argument that NV is a psyop. As a previous commenter* wrote: “striving for scientific integrity will never be a psyop.”
*RickyRants
Calling it a psy op is easier than investing the time and effort looking into the history and science for themselves and using their brains. Or they’re more afraid of risking their reputations and incomes by telling the truth. Or *they’re* controlled opposition being paid to sow confusion and distinction and mislead people back into the viral/pandemic/vaccine paradigm.
*confusion and division
The fact that you are now claiming victimhood further supports the theory that you are part of a psyop.
Where do I claim ‘victimhood’?
The fact that you are writing nonsense supports the theory that you are either a bad actor or have no clue what you are talking about.
If you disagree, feel free to supply the evidence I’ve repeatedly sought from Marky and Sasha, without success.
Hi Rodrigo, im assuming you have the evidence required to backup the psyop that viruses are real and cause disease (my words admittedly, not yours. I made an assumption to your beliefs). U less you do, how can you accuse those that demand scientific integrity of being a psyop?
I don’t back up psyops. Psyops is what YOU do. And saying viruses are a hoax or a psyop is not “demanding scientific integrity”. There are truckloads of evidence for the existence of viruses (including patents for sequences owned by bad actors). So have at it. Prove it all false.
You’re a bellend, but not for believing in viruses, we’ve all been down that road for most of our lives. You’re a bellend for defending something so vehemently while clearly not listening to the opposing argument. I guess i may have done that myself over certian topics in my life, and if have, then I’ll admid that i too have been a bellend on those occasions. So there you go, you are a bellend, but it’s nothing personal…..just a statement of fact.
And while im having a it, ill read all of your supporting evidence made up of controlled experiments proving contagion. Yawn on big boy
Im not defending anything. Im more than willing to see the evidence or even an opinion of a virologist that suggests viruses don’t exist. And have the balls to say dickhead when you mean dickhead, which in my book isnt an insult.
The evidence is all around you Dickhead. I use bellend because its my go to word for someone not really thinking. Like i said, ive too been a bellend, we all are at times, its just i have the self awareness to admit it. If I thought you were a complete fucking retarded cunt, then believe me, I’d have the balls to say it.
So you don’t have evidence, do you?
If I recall correctly, Sasha believes viruses exist but do no harm, or something. If incorrect, I apologize.
In case you need to know (which I doubt), people get labeled “Denier” for refusing to swear an oath of loyalty to malignant establishment institutions and lies. My favorite sweatshirt reads “I (big red heart) Global Warming.” Now I’m gonna print tees that read “Proud Virus Denier”.
I should retract my statement about Sasha re what she thinks about viruses. I really do not know, meaning I should shut up. But I do not get why she has Colpo on her bad man list.
As a non-medical person, the whole virus exists/does not exist argument came as a complete surprise a few years ago.
What I’d like to see is a free and open, non-personal discussion/debate on the topic by experts from the two camps.
I can accept that viruses exist, or that they don’t – but if they don’t exist then we need to understand how the pandemic (which appears to have been 20+ years in the making) was engineered and what Ralph Baruch and others actually created.
Pandemics do not happen because they cannot happen. They’re immunologically impossible, because they require transmission of sickness caused by a floating submicroscopic infectious particle aka virus, for which there is no scientific evidence of existence.
I don’t know what an individual scientist was actually doing. You do not either.
Now, he may say he’s been in moved in gain-of-function research. Is there any evidence for that, beyond his assertion. There is not.
Yes, this is the thing I’ve noticed. People involved in virology will be very happy to tell you about the gene sequences and everything they’ve been working on, and I’m sure that looks really convincing if you’ve never questioned if that gene sequence has ever actually existed in nature, or if there’s *really* any evidence that it’s been found in a sick person, or if it’s *really* transmissible and causes the same disease in another person or if the “disease” they’re talking about shows any evidence of being caused by the presence of that gene sequence in their body. Amazingly, if you chop up DNA and RNA you find small fragments of DNA and RNA, and if you look for long enough you’ll find the “right” one. But I guess that if you just followed the training and believed everything you were told, you can see the “evidence” in exactly the same place I can see no evidence. We all have the same evidence, but when you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change. People don’t want to acknowledge that they’ve just been going along with their biases and their indoctrination. Oddly, if they just applied the same stringency that they do to ghost-hunters to virologists, they’d definitely see biases all right, but..they don’t
So many sides, who can keep track?!
Can’t we go back to a time when emotionally mature adults could just agree to disagree? Or is that the problem – adults stopped maturing sometime in the last decade or two?
I have three words for the virus vs no virus debate and the rest of the “issues” that deflect from focussing on the fact that a group of techocratically-inclined psychopathic oligarchs intend to shorten your life, take your stuff and enslave you and yours: divide and conquer.
It’s a theory isn’t it. A pet theory like lab leak. The no virus people are sowing discontent to distract us. Well… Maybe the no virus is a psyop people are sowing discontent? I don’t have any evidence for this so please don’t attack me. It’s a theory like Marcus’ that I won’t be defending.
“If it were a psy-op, it’s the strangest yet. There is no downside to ‘believing’ this psy-op. In short, the upsides:
You no longer have to fear catching an illness from being around sick people, which is great for both you and the sick.
You can take full responsibility for your health, no longer are you an innocent victim of a micro-baddie when you get ill – being a victim is easy, taking responsibility is hard but rewarding.
You realise that all you need for a healthy life is easily obtained; good food, good hygiene standards, a clean environment to live in, enough exercise (daily walking) and last but not least; mental hygiene.
The powers that be have one less stick to beat you with; never again will you comply with ridiculous lockdown measures or believe in scary virus based biological warfare that might ‘escape’ from labs.
Big pharma loses a returning customer, no vaccines for you ever again. With any luck you heal yourself from chronic conditions, meaning no meds (which often are as dubious as vaccins) for you at all anymore.
All in all, this “psy-op” makes you stronger, less afraid and more of an adult.” — Debke, random Substack Note, June 20, 2025.
I’ve been part of the psyop for a while now. After March 2020 I slowly got reeled into it as my eyes opened up to the absolute evil that rampages through this benighted world. Before that, I’m not embarrassed to say, I had no idea. I was a zombie. I even used to watch TV. But, aside from being a psyopist, I’m just a regular guy, with a regular slave job that keeps body and soul together. Cheers
Once you’re awake, you can never go back to sleep.
It’s mind blowing…
I am in a similar situation: the thing I DIDN’T expect at all was how much spaciousness and joy open up to one when one stops believing in a lie. And when one notices one lie, all the others start to magically unravel. And one’s life becomes so much better, more peaceful, more joyous …one leaves the incessant victim-villan-hero dynamic of “sickness” and “saviours” and all the other victim consciousness that comes with that worldview. I suspect that psyops are generally perpetuated to increase fear, panic and uncertainty, not to give one a peace that goes far beyond authority and outsourcing
Nailed it
Virus-Believers: Viruses exist.
Team No Virus: Show me the evidence!
NV-Is-Psyop-Believers: No Virus is a psyop.
Team No Virus: Show me the evidence!
Perhaps as a starting point we need to agree on a definition for psyop and what criteria must be met for something to be a psyop.
Then we would be able to sensibly debate whether the evidence indicates if those criteria have been met or not, and what level of confidence we have around the evidence.
Criteria could include things like: astroturfing, money trails, algorithms, documentation of an agenda to deceive or distract. I don’t think belligerence, repetition or apparent fundamentalist-sounding people on the internet would qualify as sufficient evidence. Annoying and disrespectful, absolutely, but not sufficient to “prove” “beyond reasonable doubt” that there is a psyop.
E.g. as one small bit of evidence, it appears the biggest covid dissenting platforms on substack believe in viruses: https://open.substack.com/pub/plebeianresistance/p/who-have-the-largest-accounts-in?r=qdiky&utm_medium=ios
We could do a similar analysis on other platforms.
Thank you for pointing out the missing component of the whole thing.
By what criteria is that judgement ascertained?!
And the first document I can think of that details psyops, for which we can create reasonable criteria, is Operation Northwoods (1961) – the US. military psyops, false flags and other means to provoke war with an otherwise innocent nation, Cuba.
Markus va pichiatela ‘ntu culo! Anch’io sono italiana (una metà della mia famiglia è italiana) e mi sento molto tentata di far capire a Markus a che cosa serve veramente una macchina per la pasta 😉 nessuno insulta gli italiani!
thank you
So, I don’t want to poo poo the party because I like watching a knife fight from the sidelines as much as anything – but don’t involve the kids. I mean… you do you. I’m cool, and on the sidelines – like I said I’m watching. But.
Because I love both of you tough-arse warrior mofos (Sasha and Anthony) I’m going to offer unsolicited advice:
If Sasha comes in hard on the offensive just quickly apologise for bringing her daughter in as an honest mistake, no biggie and then get back to cage-fighting.
It makes me feel less dirty on the sidelines.
Also people hanging shit on the No Virus can eat plop.
Love always, Anthony. It is sad that People attack Others with zero evidence. Amazing, even.
If viruses exist, where’s the evidence – the clear-cut evidence that blob X can be injected into a well One and They will get sick with the specific disease claimed? Never seen a hint of that.
Thank You for Your work. It is very appreciated!
Most all of the steps of the so-called “isolation” protocols for viruses require a leap of faith, and those “believing without seeing” moments leap right past sound logic and actual physics. The accusers, those who push “No-Virus is a psy-op” have perfected snark. Snark is the new peudo-intelligentsia shorthand for covering one’s ears and screaming “I’m not listening!!!!!!”
Another flat earther.