If Bulls**t Were a Trumpet, the Charlie Kirk Story is an Entire Brass Band
We are told that Charlie Kirk was fatally shot on September 10 at Utah Valley University.
The current president of UVU is one Astrid S. Tuminez. To say Tuminez has solid globalist form would be an understatement. Her past consultancies/jobs/chair positions include gigs for the World Bank, AIG Global Investment, Microsoft (Singapore regional director), Brunswick Warburg, the US Institute of Peace, and the Moscow office of the Harvard Project on Strengthening Democratic Institutions.
In 2012, she authored a report on “Women’s Leadership in Asia”, supported by the Asia Society and the Rockefeller Foundation. She sits on the Carnegie Corporation board of trustees and is a permanent member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
It should come as little surprise by now that Tuminez is also a member of the World Economic Forum, the sinister, technocratic ‘think tank’ founded by Henry Kissinger protege Klaus Shwab.
But hey, this is all just a remarkable coincidence, right?
Yet Another Thoughtful Hitman Who Leaves Helpful Clues Behind
The alleged shooter of Kirk, we are told, is a 22-year-old by the name of Tyler James Robinson. According to the FBI, he shot Kirk at 12:23 pm on Wednesday, September 10.
He supposedly used this gun to do so:
Robinson, so the official tale goes, “vanished” off a roof and into the woods after the shooting. We are told the weapon above — an “imported” .30-06-caliber Mauser bolt-action rifle — was discovered wrapped in a towel by investigators, laying in the woods.
Why, when he had already successfully escaped, did Robinson dump the supposedly broken down and concealed gun in close proximity to the university campus?
Why did he abandon a gun allegedly containing bullet casings engraved with “transgender and anti-fascist ideology”?
Why did a guy with sufficient wherewithal to pull off a successful one-shot sniper assassination choose to leave such important clues near the scene?
Because in the world of bullshit psy-ops, the villain is always smart enough to evade detection and shoot someone from a distance, but always dumb enough to leave helpful clues about their identity and motives.
The Gun Story Completely Breaks Down - Literally
Robinson allegedly dumped the gun while high-tailing it on foot through the wooded area.
This is where the official story begins to fold in on itself.
By all accounts, the Mauser is not a quick-and-easy gun to break down (disassemble). However, the ‘experts’ are claiming the shooter did just that, “within seconds”.
“There are aftermarket accessories that would allow you to break this gun down,” one such ‘expert’ claimed the day after the shooting.
Here’s a video of a most athletic crisis actor the shooter running across the rooftop and jumping off the building. The camera helpfully follows him, indicating it is either a high end item capable of tracking subjects from a considerable distance or that an operator was watching the shooter live.
This in itself raises a number of pertinent questions: If UVU can afford such capable cameras, it can also afford to position them in multiple locations around campus. I’m sure the globalists want to ensure the important asset they have in Tuminez is well protected.
So where is the additional footage from those cameras? Where is the footage of the shooter arriving on the rooftop and assembling the Mauser?
If an operator was manually tracking the actor shooter, how did he identify him from a distance so quickly, literally within seconds of the shot being fired?
You can see that, as the ‘shooter’ climbs over the edge of the roof and drops to the ground below, he is holding something. Right before he climbs over the edge, he puts that something down onto the roof. The shape of that something is not consistent with a longarm firearm, nor a bag containing such a gun - irrespective of whether it is assembled or disassembled.
But let’s humor the FBI for a moment and pretend the shooter did break down his rifle “within seconds” and successfully concealed it, only to inexplicably dump it in nearby woods.
Why then, does the photo of the retrieved firearm show an assembled gun?
Crime Scene Investigation Rule #1: Don’t tamper with the evidence.
Photograph it exactly as you find it, then bag it exactly as you found it. You simply do not put together a disassembled gun that was allegedly used in an assassination at the scene, just so the New York Post has a cool picture to run.
Is That a Mauser in Your Trousers or are You Just Happy to See Me
Curiously, there is no video footage of the ‘shooter’ making his way to the top of the roof. The ‘authorities’, however, quickly released a couple of poor quality photos of the ‘shooter’ ascending a flight of stairs to the roof.
Two days later, they released these higher resolution images:
Thank you, Utah Department of Public Safety, for proving once and for all the official Kirk shooting story is complete and utter nonsense.
As you can see in the photos, the so-called ‘shooter’ is not carrying a rifle.
A longarm like the Mauser, which is over 1 meter in length, simply will not disassemble and fit into that backpack.
As for the truly absurd notion that he hid the rifle in his pants … he clearly didn’t. There is absolutely nothing suggestive of a gun strapped to those skinny-ass legs in the photos above.
Look at the degree of knee flexion he achieves in those photos. For those of you with a penchant for seeing things that aren’t there, go ahead: Strap a 50+ cm length of steel pipe to each leg, put on some jeans, then walk up and down some stairs. Be sure to post the footage so we can all have a good laugh at your expense.
But What About the Video of Him Getting Shot?
“But what about the blood?”, object people who think everything they see on TV is real.
It saddens me to think that, after decades of watching blood stream and spurt in movie scenes that anyone over 5 knows are fake, that I need to explain the concept of fake bleeding scenes to anyone.
Further, we are now in the AI age, where you can create fake bleeding effects without even needing fake blood.
Here’s the close-up video footage of Kirk getting ‘shot’. PLEASE NOTE this footage contains graphic depictions of violence and is presented for educational purposes only.
Anyone who’s ever attended an accident, shooting or stabbing scene can tell you that footage is phonier than a Chinese Prada bag.
As the video notes, the blood gushes out in a most curious flow pattern. Further, if such copious blood flow were anything other than AI-generated, it would be guaranteed to quickly turn a clean white t-shirt into a red-stained, blood-soaked mess. But it doesn’t. Excepting a narrow streak on his chest, the t-shirt remains whiter than a Colgate smile.
Kirk is then not placed on a stretcher and rushed to hospital by ambulance. Nope, instead more crisis actors his ‘security’ drag him Corey Comparatore-style to an SUV, and drive off to who knows where.
If you still believe this nonsensical tale, I really don’t know what to say, except that you are the exact kind of person who emboldens evil people in power to do evil things. After all, stupid stunts require a stupid audience to be believed.
“Yet Another Thoughtful Hitman Who Leaves Helpful Clues Behind”… ell oh ell!
It’s like finding those passports in the vicinity of the WTC.
Sane: Good call. They also found passports in Pennsylvania from the totally disappeared plane
Amazing, what are the chances?! BTW, here are 2 videos I made mocking the 911 psyop. https://substack.com/@sanefrancisco/p-172907608
One of the passports discovered floating in the molten lava of the WTC wreckage belonged to a man who was found alive in Morocco.
I’m certain he was a terminator sent from the future to protect skynet; that’s how he survived under 100,000 tonnes of boiling hot steel, felled WTC7, evaded the FBI, and then swam 2000 miles across the ocean.
If I recall correctly, he lied that he abruptly changed his flight plans, had his passport stolen at some point and apparently feared for his safety.
Just a very clever cybernetic organism covering its tracks I’m sure.
KEEP DIGGING Tony I am sure there is more to find & you are a good finder
Thanks Michael, and thanks to all the readers posting helpful info and links!
There is a very long list of things that make zero sense if this was an organic event. But if it was a hoax (no One died) psyop, everything looks perfect for that.
Thank You for yet more evidence that explains a psyop and not an organic affair.
Amarerasu: If he isn’t dead, what could they have done with him? Guantanamo? His face is known worldwide now. These folks have no qualms about killing anyone, though, and disappearing the body. I think we should ask Who had motive? and Who has the resources to carry it off? Two outfits whose name starts with the 13th letter of the alphabet come to mind.
If I had to guess, he’s probably sitting on a beach with Jeffrey Epstein right now, laughing at all of those who have fallen for the psyop.
Simple. Plastic surgery. He’ll be back on the stage in a different role, no doubt.
Who has motive? The creators of the play They put on for Us, making Us believe the show is “reality.” The “shooting” is being used to remove freedom of speech, and other things. The sandy hooks were cast into People’s emotions, and They’re dragging Us where They want Us.
The resources? LOL! The Ones who write the scripts, cast the actors, and direct from the wings, the hidden hand, owns virtually everything – media, colleges, the governmafia (all controlminds/governmafias are for-profit corporations owned by the same Ones – the USA since 1871), the education, the pHARMa/mediKILL industry, and on and on.
They have quadrillions to work with…
And that hidden hand is most likely Roman with names like Orsini…
Contemplate Plato’s cave…
Escape the Cave! (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/escape-the-cave
not needed, they’ve already dumbed down the populace enough to where he could just be out on the street tomorrow, doing the same thing even
Conceivably, but… [shrug] But I will bet They will cover the first character up and go for a new character.
Gary, It starts with the Last letter of the alphabet…
And the 6th and the 10th
ha, you really don’t know how dumbed down people are at this point. he literally could just walk the street anywhere without plastic surgery, and no one would bat an eye, as people won’t see him, he would be invisible; they’d be like, he looks a lot like that guy that got shot, and that would be it. look at what they did with the Challenger “astro-nots”, they even resumed their same careers, nobody thinks twice.. or more accurately nobody thinks even once: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtYzN81PWYk
It’s true!!! mRNA vax amnesia?
Here’s another oddity, this video clearly shows Mr. security guard receive a challenge coin from a police actor. https://www.bitchute.com/video/ocIWLvYkvcKZ/?list=notifications&randomize=false this coin looks just like the one that Mike Pence received when they were faking the impeachment of Donald Trump in his first term.
Hmmmm! Not being well versed in conspiracy theories, I wonder if you can explain what that coin signifies and whether it is some sort of confirmation that some or other supporting arrangement has been completed.
You’ve been considered worthy: If you possess a coin or have been given one, you’re in on the game. Again, it’s a pretty high honor to hold onto a challenge coin and should always be treated as such. If this was a Freemason challenge coin then this guy likely was promoted to the next level in Freemasonry. Overall it’s to congratulate him on a job well done and to commemorate this event. Kirk’s wife was seen holding one with an eagle and flag on it whilst she was mourning the silicone doll in the casket, it was the size of a drink coaster. If this was a significant event, which it was to the planners then these coins likely were made from .999 fine gold.
This is good to know. https://www.bitchute.com/video/z4fiorjsySRK
It’s probably a Masonic prayer coin.
It’s possible that it was. All I could see was a black rim and gold center.
Also. T-shirts are very interesting items of clothing, aren’t they? Especially those with specific designs, or patterns, or words on them. Go back and look at Chucky’s. What does it say? And why, do you think, does it say that? Methinks the fellow had had enough. He was sick and tired of his fake kids, his fake wife, his fake life. He’d served his time and got out. Made plenty of money in the non profit laundry that he headed up. Living, no doubt now in a compound on an island somewhere. Or, with a hot chic on a beach near Tel Aviv.
Chuck TAYLOR All-Stars, also known as “Cons” …
I was wondering why anyone needing to jump from a rooftop and then run like they mean it would choose flat-soled shoes instead of runners…
Was he really ‘that’ important? Or influential? What difference does it make if he’s alive and living in Tel Aviv, or Spain, or Necker Island? Its all about the dead saviour myth, surely?
Oh wow, think of the symbolism portrayed by the respective t-shirts: the United States government (Tyler’s flag/eagle t-shirt) kills “Freedom” (Charlie’s t-shirt)!
Anthony: It was a week ago at the farmer’s market, where I go each Wednesday, that my beef guy said that Charlie Kirk had been shot and killed by a small caliber weapon (from the sound). He and I are both very familiar with firearms, and today when I saw him, we agreed that it was a pistol shot. Most certainly not a 30-06, which has a very large case charged with 50-60 grains of powder. There are (apparently) two, although I’ve only seen one, videos of possible shooters, one of which (he says) shows the muzzle flash (which most pistol and rifle rounds routinely produce). Today I watched the blood video for the first time. It was a total fake; not a good Hollywood fake, but a poor quality AI (artificial idiocy) fake, with the blood disappearing once it gets a few inches below the armpit rather than soaking his shirt and everything else. I wasn’t at all familiar with CK until a week ago, but now I know that he said a lot of things that are true. What I can’t figure out is how they got that kid to play the patsy. Perhaps he really thought he had made a kill shot (actually not a difficult shot at 200 yds with good equipment, a properly zeroed scope, and a moderate amount of training)? I can hit a 6 inch steel at 400 yds, and I’m not any kind of marksman.
“Tyler Robinson” wasn’t even there. Is he even a real person? Apparently he has no digital footprint, just like Trump’s would-be assassin. But they did have an actor playing the person they would later say is “Tyler Robinson” walking up stairs and running across the roof (even those parts could have been played by different people).
H.O.A.X.
Anthony – thanks so much for this information – especially the video. Hadn’t thought to look at the blood yet but that’s so important to have that info.
Been doing some thinking about this CGI (AI?) manipulation and I think it’s a mistake to throw the baby out with the bathwater – e.g. that the whole event was a hoax.
It makes total sense that you’d want to manipulate the the blood and impact hit IF it wasn’t the rifle that you’re selling to the public as the murder weapon. The idea that it might have been a much closer shot by a handgun of some type seems far more likely – that shot being timed perfectly with a much more distant shot to create the illusion that it came from a distance? That’s the idea rolling around in my head now.
My question now is the CGI manipulation – sure it was done to this footage and maybe the others that are circulating? Have you compared? But there were hundreds of people in that crowd. Maybe there’s other footage that could be ‘raw’ that shows the hit as it happened without any sort of editing? I’d be willing to bet that there’s a LOT of footage from others in the audience that’s out there?
Just some thoughts. Haven’t come many firm conclusions yet outside of the official narrative being HIGHLY suspect – how could anyone 7 days out?
Your thoughts, Anthony – and thanks again! =)
My unique contribution: if Charlie Kirk was really murdered, then his body should still be in a coronial morgue instead of a coffin in a cemetery.
https://fullbroadside.substack.com/p/the-kirk-coronial-farce
It looks like Charlie Kirk was shot from the back right underneath the ear and exited through the neck near the throat that was an exit wound you saw
Looks like Tyler might be a Patsy
I find this worth considering. WhenI think about his rise to power as just a young kid with a dream who ends up being responsible for getting Trump into office, there’s no doubt his rise was planned.
Here is where it seems to fall apart for me. Did his wife know this was going to happen? He had kids and they were there. So they all moved to an island somewhere? Certainly everyone in the world knows him now. What about the church they attended. People at his church talk about knowing him and certainly 2,000 pp at a church aren’t going to go in on a lie. Are the neighbors in on it, too. Were his parents in on it? Someone, anyone, Help me understand this. Because to have this orchestrated on a massive scale would take major planning for years, and someone would most certainly let it get out.
There are no regular people who are in on it. Everyone who knows is of the non-regular, Masonic type of human, and would never ever let any worthless eater know about their secret world and plans.
I would just ask you what you REALLY know for sure about his church and the people at his church. Do you know someone personally who goes to church with him, or are you just reading things online?
I do t know anyone personally, so there’s that. I just can’t future out how he would just disappear and no one ask about it. And if his wife is part of it and she just disappears, what then? Also, if she stays active in TP how does that play out?
His “wife” may not even be his wife. She is certainly part of it, however.
clearly he’s back home already, his wife in the bizarre speech where she faked crying and faked wiping tears, had a fraudian slip, where she said their daughter came up “in our arms”; and then quickly corrected it to “my arms”; you assume people look with critical eyes, and that is not the case for most people, look at the “Trump assination attempt”; look at the Challenger astro-nots all having identical twin looking people that are all still alive: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtYzN81PWYk
David, if you have an earnest contribution, let’s hear it. If all you have is “PAHETIC” name-calling, kindly find another forum to vent your anger.
Classy
I’m glad we’re all on the same team trying to figure shit out
Adios, David.
How can the blood be computer generated when there were 4000 people there watching?
I don’t know the answer, something to consider: It very much looks like he was wearing a blood pack under his shirt that deployed just a moment before he was “shot.” (Many people have covered this if you want to look it up) They may have had this physical device to convince all those present who were regular people (I’m guessing the crowd would have been a mixture of regulars and crisis actors and possibly AI as well – I’ve seen photos of the crowd where some people’s faces are distorted as though they were AI-doctored. Of course one has to assume that could also just be an AI deception added later to confuse us!). And then the clearest video of “CK” being shot is clearly at the very least AI-altered: the blood flow going backwards, the blood not soaking into his t-shirt, and his ring switching fingers. So I would say they did both. Fake physical blood and fake AI blood. The video that got circulated was the most important because that’s what the whole country saw, so they made it as shocking and gory and traumatizing as they could, which required AI.
Some thoughts on the murder of Charlie Kirk.
I really don’t think it matters whether Charlie Kirk is dead or not. The clear messages sent out by his “killing” are:
– if we speak out we make ourselves a target
– if topic is Israel or something else we shouldn’t discuss, the risk to our wellbeing will grow considerably
– if the powerful decide to take action against us the state won’t offer any protection
– we are helpless in the face of their power
Whether Charlie Kirk died or not doesn’t matter. A real hit or a staged hit, the messaging is exactly the same.
Bingo
Exactly. It wouldn’t matter if it was real or not because of these “events” are to get a message across, divide and cause chaos, and to gain control. And the control aspect is so that we, the people, willing place the control on ourselves. They keep pulling the same stunt and most of us are not even seeing it.
This precisely.
If so, then they are making a terrible strategic error.
The killing of Charlie Kirk will have the opposite effect, bringing enormous attention to him, the concept of free speech, and the views that got him murdered.
I didn’t even know he existed until the assassination.
The CIA teaches that discrediting and ruining people is far more effective at destroying ideas than killing. A well timed fake scandal can ruin a person’s reputation and drag their views through the mud. Tarring all their supporters with the same dirty brush.
When you try to openly oppress a view with violence, the result is to drive it underground where it festers in the dark silently corrupting everything. This is what happened when the Romans tried to suppress Christianity, and again when the Catholic church tried to suppress criticism.
Widely publicised martyrdom actually creates the impression of truth suppression and increases the credibility of the deceased.
So it is more likely he was killed by a group that agreed with him.
If I am right, the next false flag to counter it could be a supposed supporter of Kirk attacking key left wing figures to avenge him. That would delegitimise his followers and allow the left to frame this as a gun control issue.
If I am wrong then perhaps there is a feeling that they are rapidly losing control and are desperate to slow it down somehow.
We are living in a crazy world where opponents do battle by publicly framing one another for atrocities.
He wasn’t killed.
Charlie Kirk fake killing
WATCH THE ORIGINAL FOOTAGE ….VERY CAREFULLY. Then view the 2 vids below for analysis of the psyop.
That killing was scripted and staged.
So… CK signalled to the guys behind to set off the shooting. This is how they were able to pinpoint the most relevant point of his speech for the ensuing publicity.
CK wore a blood filled squib inside his t-shirt which pushed the blood upwards to his neck on the left side to look like an arterial gush. The bullet mark moved from the right of his tee to his throat. A.I.? CGI? Totally fake. Done in films all the time.
The stool collapsed sideways so he was out of the audience sight. Their imagination did the rest.
NO AMBULANCES or emergency staff anywhere. And no medics were called. And wheres the autopsy?
Crisis actors were dotted around to create distraction while the crew cleared up the film set hustled him away wrapped in blankets. No blood trail
So many anomalies.
CKs non killing was a False Flag.
https://rumble.com/v6ysuki-dont-be-fooled-they-killed-the-character-charlie-kirk-but-the-actors-still-.html
https://rumble.com/v6ywsv0-the-charlie-kirk-shooting-hoax-100-exposed-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin.html
Michael Jaco’s analysis
https://rumble.com/v6ys47y-michael-jaco-update-today-sep-11-was-the-charlie-kirk-shooting-a-false-flag.html
I disagree. It’s vital people know how this was done. So…How was it done?
Charlie Kirk fake killing. Hollywood style film set up.
WATCH THE ORIGINAL FOOTAGE ….VERY CAREFULLY. Then view the 2 vids below for analysis of the psyop.
That killing was scripted and staged.
So… CK signalled to the guys behind to set off the shooting. This is how they were able to pinpoint the most relevant point of his speech for the ensuing publicity.
CK wore a blood filled squib inside his t-shirt which pushed the blood upwards to his neck on the left side to look like an arterial gush. The bullet mark moved from the right of his tee to his throat. A.I.? CGI? Totally fake. Done in films all the time.
The stool collapsed sideways so he was out of the audience sight. Their imagination did the rest.
NO AMBULANCES or emergency staff anywhere. And no medics were called. And wheres the autopsy?
Crisis actors were dotted around to create distraction while the crew cleared up the film set then hustled him away wrapped in blankets. No blood trail
So many anomalies.
CKs non killing was a False Flag.
https://rumble.com/v6ysuki-dont-be-fooled-they-killed-the-character-charlie-kirk-but-the-actors-still-.html
https://rumble.com/v6ywsv0-the-charlie-kirk-shooting-hoax-100-exposed-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin.html
Michael Jaco’s analysis
https://rumble.com/v6ys47y-michael-jaco-update-today-sep-11-was-the-charlie-kirk-shooting-a-false-flag.html
No it’s not. The more people understand this was fake the more wake up.
THAT is the only thing that matters.
Look at the comparisons with the JFK assassination and the framing of Lee Harvey Oswald.
Public execution clearly a professional hit ✅
Signallers in the crowd ✅
Botched / rushed autopsy ✅
Mysterious plane flight from local airfield ✅
Body removed from State hospital ✅
Unlikely lone gunman identified almost immediately ✅
Family involved in turning in suspect ✅
Murder weapon identified almost immediately ✅
Suspicious DNA evidence linking the patsy to the weapon ✅
Alternate patsy lined up but not used ✅
Presented as an open and shut case despite conflicting evidence ✅
FBI not looking for anyone else ✅
There are way too many coincidences for the Charlie Kirk murder to have happened as it is being described.
I’m surprised he didn’t leave his passport too…
This is SO obviously a huge con job!
Alas, couldn’t watch the BitChute video as the UK government and Ofcom have forced them to terminate access for the UK audience due to harassment!
See the post I just put up in my notes with the screenshots of BitChute’s official statement of facts.
The UK is very obviously the epicentre of the worlds’ “total population control and manipulation agenda”… thank God I’m moving to Italy next year!
This is schizophrenic ranting.
Says a guy who cannot even begin to refute anything written here.
Why is it you believers of this mainstream rot NEVER have anything to offer but name-calling and insults?
I’m sure the poor fellow was assassinated, but it couldn’t be more clear that most of the official parts of the story have been manufactured.
They hate you and think you are stupid, and they must be stopped.
100% hoax event. It’s good that people can see through this. Why are the perps allowed to get away with this crime?
Drag his ass into the murdered out SUV, it’s a fucking SNL Skit
The rifle in the photo is not any kind of “break down” rifle. The shooter could not have removed the barrel without a bench vise and specialized equipment.
It’s ridiculous isn’t it. They haven’t dumbed down everyone yet just MSM viewers.
Thanks for these complements of informations!
I totally agree with your point of view. I did make similar comments:
https://substack.com/@danyele903666/note/c-155966573
Best.
You conspiracy theorists are awful.
And you believers of mainstream rot have absolutely nothing to offer but insults and name-calling.
I am reminded of the time I was on a jury for an assault case. The prosecution had entered into evidence a steel crowbar taken from the defendant’s truck. The victim, in both statements to the police and under oath on the witness stand, that the defendant had struck him with a wooden baseball bat. I am wondering what the relevance of the crowbar was. It clearly wasn’t the weapon used. Then I realized it was to prejudice the jury to think the defendant must be guilty because he had a weapon in his truck. We acquitted him.
I think the rifle is serving a similar purpose here. It cannot be established as the murder weapon as no bullet has been recovered. It’s a red herring meant to convince the stupid people that a murder took place and evidence is being gathered. Who carries a firearm in its box, except after purchase? Another detail, wouldn’t removing the victim from a crime scene be tampering with evidence/obstruction of justice unless it was part of the plan. So much wrong with this whole situation.
100% fake
Yeah, who needs things like opposing views and a reminder that very powerful people are not acting in our best interests.
Bye now!
I think you, along with all of us in human nature, expect everything to follow a neat, logical course. But that is not how life works. If you do some research and tell us that an ambulance was at other events like this… that has value in comparative analysis. But, in real life, a speaker might not have an ambulance at his event and that be normal. So then, he’s going to have an SUV for security people and himself. Nothing strange about them using that. Not the neat, logical course of everything being according to a set script – but actually pretty normal in human adaptation to extreme events in a quick reaction.
I don’t know about the blood discussion. I think we’d need to see the vehicle. Because they threw him in quick. Was there blood all over the vehicle? We don’t have that info.
I have a bit of a bias, perhaps, because I have been involved in things that people just could not believe… because it didn’t fit their preconceived concept of a “right narrative” of “how things should happen”. They were wrong.
There could be valid objections about the gun that would be explained by more than one in the team of Tyler Robinson taking care of that gun for him. They could have picked up the real gun, planted the fake gun. Why? Because they were weird and wanted to keep the real gun as a momento like a serial killer keeps things.
I dunno about the rest.
Not saying you are wrong… but did you see Nancy Reagan over the casket of Ronald Reagan? Wives do these things. Sometimes they appear really contrived and dramatic – but that is another judgment of how “things should be” – that has no basis in the reality of human experience expressing emotion in grief. Widows do some things – because they just cannot handle the death of their spouse in a less expressive manner. And they do not consider catching that on film as inappropriate at all.
So, I just cannot accept criticism of a widow, even if the motive was not as disrespectful as it feels to me.
Hi there,
the blood is clearly AI-generated, the entire story surrounding the gun is not just unlikely but impossible, and Erika Kirk’s performance was just that: a performance.
I don’t expect life to always follow a neat, logical course – but I also do not appreciate people pissing in my ear and telling me it’s summer rain.
LOL We don’t need that kind of rain.
They paved over the crime scene I guess. And the surgeon says that Charlie Kirk was a “man of steel” so that the bullet did not go through his neck to kill the people behind him. They said this was a “miracle” – a “miracle” that saved the lives of the people behind him. But did not save his life. That just doesn’t make sense. It seems a rather inappropriate statement by a surgeon. Not scientific. Has no medical or forensic factual basis. And, seems a mockery, because one of the sayings is that the “man of steel” is faster than a speeding bullet (he cannot be killed by a bullet).
The surgeon talking like that is a major problem. Makes it seem the entire medical response team cannot be trusted.
So, yeah, seems like more issues that start causing it to be leaving the logical course so far that it generates distrust as you say.
Cheers.
Also, you can’t get shot from the front and blood gushes from the front, and you fall forward. That supposed wound we see is an exit wound.
The entire plan was to suspend constitutional rights, demonize progressives and Democrats, attack free press, frighten members of Congress into submission, and maintain military occupation of the country as a reason to cancel the 2026 midterm election. MAGA is in decline, Trump is a failure but Democrats in power a serious threat because they will investigate and uncover serious financial crimes and expose the Epstein story.
As real as the attempted “assassination” of presidential candidate.
So dumb you can’t even begin to post anything resembling a refutation.
I’m smart enough to understand that you’re a feeble-minded sod wholly incapable of overcoming his mass-programming, who is still at that pathetic, child-like level of believing whatever the media and government says.
What I’ve written here clearly upsets you, but not because it’s wrong. Rather, you are emotionally triggered. The fact that you have absolutely zero factual rebuttal to what I’ve written further frustrates and annoys you.
You then feign intellectual superiority LOL.
So many idiots, so little time.
For a guy who calls others “delusional and desperate” you sure are totally clueless.
“He could have stashed the gun on site before the shooting, then dropped it off the roof anx grabbed it on his way out, etc.”
Maybe watch the actual video of the so-called shooter making his escape before coming here and acting like an all-knowing jackass?
The video shows him dropping NOTHING off the roof. He is holding something as he jumps to the ground, and it is NOT a gun, nor is it the shape or consistency of a bag holding a gun.
“There is video of him moving through the neighborhood afterward with it in his pant leg.”
ROTFLMFAO.
Please, go ahead, enlighten us, make a video of yourself running like the alleged shooter in that video with a .30-06 Mauser (or similar-sized gun) stock in one pant leg, and the barrel in the other, while wearing denim jeans.
YOU WON’T BE ABLE TO DO IT.
Prove me wrong.
“Now show your video that proves he never dropped the rifle off the roof anywhere before jumping down himself.”
It’s IN THE ARTICLE, as I’ve already told you. But since you clearly need to be spoon fed:
https://www.fbi.gov/video-repository/utah-valley-shooting-video-091025.mp4/view
Watched the video, it does NOT show a gun, nor does it show him dumping a gun. If you are going to come here and argue with me, at least have the decency not to LIE through your teeth. Do you think I’m as dumb as you?
Seriously?
” So the belief is that in that footage right there. just 3 minutes before he gets to campus that he had that weapon right there on his right leg.”
The “belief”, huh?
Anyone who believes that video shows a gun on his right leg, is clearly delusional.
Do you have anything other than a crisis actor walking with a slight limp but no gun?
And where was this slight limp when he jumped off the building and ran from the scene like a boss?
I’ll ask again:
Make a video of yourself running like the alleged shooter in that video with a .30-06 Mauser (or similar-sized gun) stock in one pant leg, and the barrel in the other, while wearing denim jeans.
YOU WON’T BE ABLE TO DO IT.
You’re the level of delusional and desperate to avoid the obvious conclusion this entire event was a pre-orchestated crock of shit.
Next…
“He very clearly has the gun”
LOL.
Please by all means, provide the exact time point at which the gun is “clearly” visible.
And I’ll ask you for the THIRD time:
Make a video of yourself running or even WALKING like the alleged shooter in those videos with a .30-06 Mauser (or similar-sized gun) stock in one pant leg, and the barrel in the other, while wearing denim jeans.
You simply won’t be able to fit a Mauser down your jeans. Period.
I can’t help it if you’re blind and delusional.
Ansel, you clearly don’t know what a longarm rifle looks like. That object you highlight is NOT a gun, it is a long rectangular object. Which does not hold its long rectangular shape at 0:36–0:38, which is when you get the best view of it.
Now – asking for the FOURTH time:
Instead of highlighting geometric shapes that are not akin to those of a gun, POST A VIDEO in which you successfully place a Mauser down your jeans and walk and run with it.
It’s your big chance to prove us wrong, AV. Why are you so reluctant to seize it?
I think we both know the answer.
It boggles my mind how desperate some delusional people are to keep believing and supporting this total crock of shit. Mentally ill people.
Oh, and thanks for inspiring another article:
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/you-cant-run-like-a-boss-with-a-mauser
“I’ve shown you the video of him walking with it down his pantleg and inside his shirt.”
Inside his SHIRT now? LOL
You haven’t shown me anything other than how obstinately stupid and gullible you are.
Oh, and any time you’re ready with that video of you rocking a rifle inside your jeans…
Great, let’s see the video of you sliding it in your jeans and walking with it.
LOL.
Ansel, still photos of you PARTIALLY sliding a rifle down LOOSE pants is not the same as a VIDEO of you stuffing a rifle down your close-fitting JEANS and walking with it.
The reason you won’t post a video of you walking with a long arm rifle down your JEANS is because it is IMPOSSIBLE.
Don’t give me this BS about privacy. If you’re not man enough to publicly stand behind your cocksure statements, you can easily redact your face in the video – just as you did in the photos.
So I’ll ask for the umpteenth time: Post a non-altered video (save for face redaction) of yourself sliding a rifle down your JEANS and WALKING with it.
“This isn’t rocket science.”
That’s right, it’s not rocket science. I have made a simple request and you do everything BUT fulfill that simple request.
I must say, this is getting quite repetitive and boring.
“I don’t own jeans.”
No worries, go to a thrift shop and buy a pair for $5. Small price to pay for proving me wrong, which you are clearly desperate to do. Not to mention that you’d become an instant hero among all your fellow believers of this BS.
“Again, the video is already there.”
You did not post a video of the shooter with a gun down his jeans, and you did not post a video of yourself with a gun down your jeans.
All you posted was some joke in which a crisis actor faked a slight limp and a couple of Fox and TMZ wankers admitted you could not see a gun anywhere but that “the belief” is there was a gun down his jeans LOL
“I don’t intend to change your mind.”
Right. That’s why you keep coming back here to argue with me despite having completely FAILED to supply the most cursory of evidence.
You are deeply delusional on this and committed to finding ways to ignore all the evidence you are provided. A true believer. Like a young earth creationist, really.
I think the evidence that this was a total farce is obvious to those who aren’t retarded, delusional, or liars.
Good luck tilting at windmills, Ansel!
Poor Ansel.
Keeps telling me he is done arguing with me, then keeps coming back to argue with me lol
Now your rebuttal is to simply provide a link to this exchange?
R U Ok, Ansel?
Ansel, I have given you REPEATED opportunity to post a video showing a real live human being (you, or a friend if you have one) putting a rifle of similar dimension to a Mauser .30-06 down your jeans and walking with it.
You have repeatedly refused to do so.
You claim to own a rifle. You have an online platform. You surely have a phone with a camera. And your ridiculous excuse of not owning a pair of jeans is irrelevant when you can easily buy a pair from TJ Maxx or a thrift shop.
So what’s the big deal? It would take very little time to fulfill my request.
Instead, you insult my intelligence by posting a video of some actor faking a limp which even the anchors admit shows no sign of a gun.
You also post still pictures of someone NOT wearing jeans and NOT walking with a gun tucked down their pants.
Ansel, this is getting ridiculous. You have long since passed the point of being a demented little pest. You clearly have no intention of providing the simple evidence I request – and we both know why.
Enough is enough. You’ll need to take your mentally ill trolling gig elsewhere.
Mr. Vandemeer, you can’t be serious.
Why aren’t there more than a couple of videos? Today I was watching a performer playing guitar and singing, there were at least 4 people taking videos… in a bar/restaurant.
Why only one shot; I can’t think of one assass*nation that only had a single shot.
Mixing facts and myth . I guess that’s how you’re confuse Joe blow.!
Nope, just building 7 collapsing on itself after a few floors of furniture burning. As a structural engineer I can assure you that cannot happen. Never did before or after 9/11, in spite of hundreds of high rise fires all over the world.
Wake up Barry.
I’m beginning to think it’s because they knew their first fake assassination attempt was completely unbelievable, so this time they needed to actually carry it out to the full extent.
I still have the question – when will be the resurrection?
Skye: Good point. My suspicion is that we will never know what happened; fake looks so real now. The objective of the perpetrators of all of these is chaos.
Anthony, and everyone else. There is a very good acoustic analysis of the shot, clearly and unequivocally showing that it was fired at close range by a semi-automatic pistol. He also shows an Israeli-designed cellphone gun which shoots (2) .380’s, a small caliber which sounds just like the murder shot. I know guns, too, and he’s correct. He calls the 22-year-old kid a patsy, like Lee Harvey Oswald (what Oswald called himself when they arrested him) I don’t have a link, but you can find it at:
IsraeliNews Live David Ben-Nun “Who Really Shot Charlie Kirk?”
A deep dive into the Israeli connection with the JFK assassination, composed largely of documents with explanation is the recently-published “JFK and RFK’s Secret Battle against Zionist Extremism,” by Ken McCarthy.
https://israelinewslive.org/who-really-fired-the-shot-that-killed-charlie-kirk-two-technical-clues-that-demand-answers/
Self-deluded kooks! Take 2 Occam’s Razors and call your shrink in the morning.
This guy here has an interesting take on the alleged shooting. He states that it was done as a ritual for the blood moon and the funeral is scheduled for the eclipse. Details in two videos he did on it. Both about 1.23 minutes long. I don’t have Instagram so can’t comment on his other vids. https://www.instagram.com/reality.revolt/?hl=en
So what is the opinion? Charlie Kirk is not dead? The man who handed himself in is not guilty? Its all a hoax? I am really confused over her in the UK
Agreed… Kirk in Valhalla
This stretches on a few points. I’ve worked with facility camera systems to do investigations before. The in-frame zoom is a pretty basic feature, even after the recording. Notice how the time stamp in the top left of the screen disappears when they zoom. It’s labeled FBI, which tells me they added the zoom after the fact to highlight that motion.
Blood flow, couple things. I’m willing to chalk up a lot to camera quality as far as color. I’ve given over a gallon of blood in my lifetime, venous blood is very dark. The camera at that distance may not collect true-to-life colors.
Also, frames per second capture. Someone did an experiment recording an oscillating hose 10-15 years ago. At 24 Hz (same rate as the camera) the oscillating flow of water held still, though you could still see the end of the stream splashing on the ground. At 25 hz, the oscillation moved slowly from the hose to the ground. At 23 hz, it appeared to reverse direction. Which may be happening with this recording. People aren’t likely to record an entire TPUSA event on their phone at the highest resolution, either, when the average capacity is 64 GB (minus space for games and all their other memes).
Last on blood: wicking. Any fluid takes time to move through an absorbent surface. The segment of video after the bleeding starts is less than a second. This needs more research on how his shirt would perform in this situation (e.g.: DriFit or polyester rayon vs. cotton), but this theory seems to be splitting hairs to me.
We agree on the reported ballistics not making sense, though: https://youtu.be/ltakvGyzfZs?si=lQr2lKklchLRsjSq
The reaction force of getting hit in the back right side of the neck would pull out Charlie’s earpiece.
B I N G O! Plus obvious / dubious CK “assistants” mentors and friends actions. This reeks of CIA / FBI bungled jumbled and media collusion. Period!
Where are the dozens of personal cell phone videos of him speaking when he’s “shot”? There’s only ONE or TWO official videos? This isn’t 1964? Where are all the security camera videos from all over the campus during the “shot”?
You need photos/vids uploadable.
Another great read Anthony; the evidence is mounting up that this was in fact, a psyop. How anyone can dispute this idk. Then again, you still have idiots believing that the twin towers were brought down by aeroplanes, so…