What Happens When You Can't Explain the Lack of an Exit Wound?

Easy: Cue the Miracle Man of Steel Theory!

The guy pictured above is Andrew Kolvet. His X bio says he is “Christian. Proud husband and father. TPUSA Spokesman. Executive Producer of The Charlie Kirk Show. Son of Nevada. American.”

Sure.

I don’t know Andrew personally, but I can tell you one thing with certainty:

He is one of the worst liars I’ve ever come across.

Get a load of what he posted on X today:

Well, that explains everything, then.

Our unnamed physician - let’s call him Dr Doolittle - has finally solved the exit wound mystery using impeccable scientific rigor.

Okay, so he’s a bumbling idiot who missed a large bullet even though it was “just beneath the skin” the whole time.

Not to worry, the coroner got it in the end.

The brilliant Dr Doolittle was pondering the intractable mystery of how a .30-06 can effortlessly leave exit wounds in much larger game animals, but not a pencil-necked human.

Just when he was about to throw down his scrubs and call it a day, Dr Doolittle remembered what his favorite lecturer had always told him at the Trust Me Bro School of Medicine:

“Son, when you can’t find an answer, just make one up.”

Eureka!

Dr Doolittle rushed to the phone. The man at the other end picked it up.

“Andrew,” gasped Dr Doolittle, “you’re not going to believe this!”

“What?”

“It’s about Charlie!”

“What about him?”

“He’s not who you think he is!”

“Doc, what are you talking about?”

“Charlie Kirk is no ordinary mere mortal! He’s not even Charlie Kirk. He’s Clark Kent!”

That’s right, ladies and gentlemen.

Faster than a speeding bullet!

Well, almost.

More powerful than a locomotive!

Able to leap tall buildings in a single bound!

Able to do anything except out-argue Cambridge students!

(Those cheeky little Brit buggers were his kryptonite, apparently).

Charlie Kirk, ladies and gentlemen, was...

Wait, that’s not really Charlie Kirk. That’s an AI-generated image. Kirk didn’t have pecs like that. He was tall and lanky. Superman was like, athletic and stuff.

Which means that if Charlie Kirk really got shot in the neck with a .30-06, he would have suffered a similar fate to this replica human head consisting not of steel, but of ballistics gel and a cast resin skull:

And this is what happens when a nature-hardened deer - which, compared to lanky Charlie, is the friggin’ Hulk - gets blasted from 200 yards with a .30-06 (warning - graphic and fatal hunting footage):

And what would happen if you were to shoot actual steel with a .30-06?

Let’s find out:

So…

… a .30-06 will blow a simulated skull to smithereens.

It will leave a large exit wound in a deer.

It will blast straight through a steel plate.

But Kolvet wants you to believe that, in Kirk’s case, the bullet thoughtfully parked itself right beneath his skin?

Do I really need to go on?

And now, a word from your puppet-in-chief:

Anthony Colpo’s Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

62 Comments

  1. I’m just making a video on CK and this guy. Need to know more about him. Got any leads? I’ll research more tomorrow in any case as it’s late now. Btw, your stack really good!

    • Hi SF,

      don’t know much about Kolvet, we’re all learning about these jokers in real time! It’s getting late here too so signing off soon.

      “Btw, your stack really good!”

      Thanks!

      Let me know when your video is up!

  2. Round most likely deflected off and was deformed by ballastic vest that absorbed alot of the kinectic energy. Likekly a level 3a vest with metal plate inserts such as this that can easily hide under tee shirt:

    https://pivotalbodyarmor.com/products/tactical-scorpion-014-level-iiia-concealable-soft-armor-shirt

    Deformed round deflected upward off plate insert and created a large entrance wound without exit. If he wasnt wearing a ballastic vest then there should have been a small entrance and large exit wound.

    Both autopsy and police report should mention body armor. Autopsy should note defect in shirt (round entrance) and damage to body armor.

      • 1. “Team” is lying because theb they would have to explain why he was wearing body armor.
        2. FBI would have to exclude evidence of body armor.
        3. Medical examiner would need to discuss issue also. Ive been involved with forensic autopsies of this type (with FBI and NCIS agents involved). ME should discuss entrance wound, etc. Any shirt defects (round entrance) is easily identified.
        4. Ive shot teflon tip rounds from a .308 and shot 30-06, both took down deer from 300+ yards with through and through wounds… with large exit wounds.. Agree 100% with you that his bones would not simply deflect a hypesonic round at ~160yrds. Not possible.

        So people are lying one way or the other. Not good.

        • Plus there would have been a large contusion (bruise) and/or broken ribs on his upper chest where round impacted armor… again.. something that should be in autopsy report

  3. Just listen to USA Military Sniper Simon Timothy on Youtube about this being a close up shooting from the right side of Charlie, exit wound in his left Neck

  4. If Charlie’s neck stopped a 30-06 by some miracle then the message from god is really clear; We need to kill a lot more people with imaginary rounds.

  5. Indeed, the whole was 100% lies to get agendas rolling. Demonize freedom of speech, and distract from the Palantirization of the planet.

    Thanks for You keen delivery of the bunk We are sold as “truth.”

    • Be careful about MM’s analyses. The last photo of the crowd in that document was taken in Seattle if you read the getty images page it was sourced from but he implies it is somewhere in Europe and AI generated. Cross-check everything.

  6. Thanks for another great analysis Anthony. I think people have watched to many movies where someone gets shot and the bullet(pristine condition) is dug out from just beneath the skin, or passes through without contacting bone or vital organs, ignoring the large wound cavity created by hydrostatic shock. While shooting ballistics gel or watermelons is dramatic and demonstrates the power of a bullet traveling faster than the speed of sound, we can’t fully replicate what damage to a human would be. But, we have meat targets, created from things like pork chops, pork ribs, oranges to simulate lung tissue, that show that bullets penetrate more than skin deep. Ammunition manufacturers focus on penetration performance. A bullet that only went skin deep would be useless. The reality is that rather than making Charley Kirk superhuman, we should be calling him no-neck Charley if he were truly shot with a .30-06. You don’t have to come up with alternative theories of what he really was shot with, only continue to demonstrate the story being told is bullshit. BTW, I’m tired of listening to all the Charley Kirk sycophants, who you never heard supporting him before.

  7. We can only hope that, internet being what it is today, it was only 19m bots that are logged as ‘views’ on that dumb X post. It’s an insult if this guy really thinks X is a reflection of human intelligence.

  8. Kolvet has also said that, within the “first few hours” after Kirk’s assassination, he “got a call from the CEO of Daily Wire,” during which they made plans for the Daily Wire team to guest host the show.

    Less than a week later, Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh, and Michael Knowles were live in studio with Kolvet, and Shapiro stated on air that they’re “willing to provide” and “are providing” “any level of material support,” after which Kolvet, who is also a spokesman for TPUSA, announced a $1 million donation from The Daily Wire.

    Here’s the video: https://substack.com/@decensorednews/note/c-157819797

  9. The farcical story that he was shot with a 30-06 should be obvious to anyone who shot anything with a 30-06, 270, 308 etc. A high powered 30 caliber bullet would have blown his head to pieces. Watch the Zapruder film for a reasonable example.

  10. The evidence mounts. Anybody honestly considering the facts you laid out and conjecture based upon simple empirical evidence would have to conclude the official story is frightfully inaccurate and deceptive.

    Anthony, your post, “Detailed analysis of Charlie Kirk “shooting” video proves the whole thing was a crock”, was an excellent demonstration of a psyop in action. Originally when I viewed the post and the embedded video, it was not behind a paywall. I circulated it on telegram and sent it to a small list of people that would find it of interest. I was disappointed to see that it was placed behind your paywall, making it inaccessible to those that I reached out to. I understand, it’s important to be supported by your community. Still, I’m appreciative of your always engaging work.

    • Hi Danny,

      if they are not already “paid” articles, my Substack posts get paywalled after 48 hours.

      However, all my articles on this Charlie Kirk hoax have been de-paywalled. To make them free again, I have to manually remove the paywall after 48 hours. As I don’t sit by my computer 24/7 with a timer, there’s usually a time lag between the article being paywalled and then being freely accessible again.

      I’m not aware of any other way to selectively de-paywall the articles.

      Anyways, the article you mention should be freely accessible again.

      Thanks for reading and sharing,

      kind regards,

      Anthony.

    • Good question.
      They know the average person is terribly gullible, but in a country like the US with a high percentage of gun owners, how could they possibly expect this “miracle” no-exit-wound bollocks to gain traction?

  11. Perhaps, there was another shooter –shooting from a different angle. Just what was the trajectory of the bullet? Shall we revisit the JFK assassination?

Leave a Reply to C.M. Cardinale Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.


*


Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.