'Anti-Vaxxers' and 'Conspiracy Theorists' vs People Who Believe Anything. Guess Who Wins (Again)?
The world's biggest study on COVID ‘vaccine’ side effects has recently been published online. Before I discuss the eye-opening findings, I thought it would be instructive to take a quick trip down memory lane and revisit the peak years of COVID insanity. The days when pro-vaxxxers, with all the fervor of religious extremists who think 'AIDS' is a divine punishment, spewed hatred at those of us who just wanted to be left the heck alone. These were the self-righteous, all-knowing idiots who mindlessly recited slogans like Follow The Science!™ while blindly following the crowd.
It makes for an interesting exercise to see where the science has actually traveled, and compare its findings to what the mainstream lunatic fringe was incessantly yelling just a couple of short years ago.
Yet Another Clueless 'Journalist' Who Made Seriously Misinformed Statements About Vaccines
A week or so ago, while searching for something else online, I happened upon an article titled "Just 15 Celebrities Who Have Made Seriously Misinformed Statements About Vaccines." The article appeared on a website called BuzzFeed, and was authored by a Morgan Sloss, whose other epic contributions to literary history include "Margot Robbie Broke Her Silence On Her 'Barbie' Oscar Snub For Best Actress" and "Drew Barrymore Joked That She's Giving Up On Dating Apps After A Guy Lied To Her About Being An NFL Quarterback."
Something tells me Morgan doesn't spend a whole lot of time analyzing research papers.
BuzzFeed, an eager outlet for brain-dead celebrity gossip, doesn't exactly qualify as an impartial stalwart of science, either. Especially when it receives money from Pfizer in return for placing paid posts on its website.
"As of today," laments Sloss in her article, which was last updated on November 3, 2021, "only 61% of Americans have been fully vaccinated against COVID-19, despite concerns about the Delta and Omicron variants."
She continues:
"With so many people refusing the COVID vaccine — even though it is CDC-recommended and proven to be safe — I thought it would be interesting to look back and see which celebrities have taken anti-vax stances in the past." (Bold emphasis added)
She then goes on to list a bunch of celebrities who allegedly made "Seriously Misinformed Statements About Vaccines."
As an example of what Sloss considers "Seriously Misinformed," she cites a chap called Offset. In December 2020, Mr Offset was asked by TMZ if he would be getting the COVID pseudo-vaccine, and he replied in the negative. "I don't trust it," he said.
Perfectly reasonable and cautious stance, methinks.
Six months prior to Sloss penning her seriously misinformed article, Offset said he still hadn't been gene therapied while on the radio show The Breakfast Club. "I'm not tryna be a lab rat, man," he said.
Well, that's just not cricket according to Sloss, who says it's a "fact that the vaccines were tested in large-scale clinical trials, endorsed by the FDA, and have been given to more than 200 million Americans."
It's true that the pseudo-vaccines were 'tested' in large-scale clinical trials - and shown to be utterly useless (for those who are shocked or outraged by this statement, you can begin your much-needed deprogramming here, here, here, here, here, and here).
It's also true that the pseudo-vaccines were endorsed by the terminally corrupt FDA, an agency with a notorious revolving door with the industries it is supposed to regulate, one that derives 75% of its drug review funding from the very companies whose drugs it reviews. Gee, no possible conflict of interest there!
And, according to the official stats, it's true that over 200 million Americans have received the poison pricks. Those same Americans are now suffering an alarming jump in excess mortality.
None of those things mean the 'vaccines' are "proven to be safe." To the contrary, they all point to one conclusion: The 'vaccines' are a dangerous fraud promoted by a pack of corrupt grubs.
With all due respect, Sloss clearly has no idea what she is talking about, and neither do the angry ferals that pollute the comments section following her article. That comments section is a shining monument to the proud, militant gullibility and stupidity that hallmarked the peak years of COVID insanity.
An anonymous hate-ball using the moniker ‘seaword’ typifies the seething disdain held by the stupid towards those who were wary of taking a drug based on a technology with a 30-year track record of failure.
"What's even more dangerous than these morons," says seaword of people who refuse to take dangerous gene therapies, "is the people that believe their bullshit. Not one of them has a medical degree or any type of education in virology, epidemiology or infectious diseases. 'BuT i DiD mY rEsEarCh'. Piss off wankers."
Says the histrionic wanker who thinks celebrity gossip columnists are legitimate sources of health information.
The remainder of the comments section is an orgy of hate hurled at people who don't go along with the crowd, by people whose brains would crack under the strain of attempting an original thought. Here’s a sampling of the kind of towering intellect that characterizes the Church of Vaxxx:
When you're dumb enough to believe an obvious liar like Anthony Fauci, there is no limit to the crazed vile you'll launch at those with the temerity to not be as gullible as you.
So, 2-and-a-half years on, how is the cocksure hatred and arrogance of the pro-vaxxxine mob travelling?
Is it ageing like a fine wine, or decomposing like a dead fish?
With so many people 'mysteriously' dropping dead or sustaining debilitating illnesses, I thought it would be interesting to look at some of the more recent data confirming what a truly horrendous act the COVID gene therapies were.
Follow the Science: Largest Study to Date Confirms Vaxxxine Dangers
On February 12, Vaccine journal published a study by The Global COVID Vaccine Safety (GCoVS) Project evaluating the risk of "adverse events of special interest" following COVID-19 'vaccination.'
Encompassing ten sites across 8 countries, this is the largest published study to date on the topic of COVID 'vaccine' side effects. The study sample included over 99 million 'vaccinated' individuals from Argentina, Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, New Zealand and Scotland.
Rest assured, this was no collaboration by so-called 'anti-vaxxers.' The GCoVS project is financed by the industry-funded and intensely pro-vaccine Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Public Health Ontario and Canadian health research institute ICES. A number of the researchers have financial ties to drug companies including GSK, Gilead Sciences, Lundbeck, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi and Pfizer.
Hardly a group that stands to gain from dumping on the wares of Big Pharma. Quite the opposite, in fact.
The study focused on a small portion of the hundreds of different side effects linked to the COVID gene therapies. The researchers examined thirteen adverse events of special interest (AESIs), falling under 3 main categories: Neurological, hematologic (blood), and cardiovascular.
The researchers calculated AESI risk on the basis of “Observed versus Expected” (OE) incidents, occurring up to 42 days after injection. That means they calculated the expected number of cases using pre-vaxxx background rates of the studied AESIs from 2015 to 2019 (2019–2020 for Denmark). These rates were then compared with the rates observed in the study's vaxxxinated sample up to six weeks post-injection.
The study periods ranged between December 2020 and August 2023. Three gene therapies were included in the analysis: Pfizer's BNT162b2, Moderna's mRNA-1273, and AstraZeneca's ChAdOx1 vaccines.
Most 'vaccine' recipients were in the 20–59-year age range. The states with the highest numbers of doses in the study were Ontario, Canada (32,159,817) - ruled by Castro-loving tyrant Justin Trudeau - and Victoria, Australia (15,617,627), whose once-vibrant capital Melbourne became the world's most locked-down city under the dictatorship of lanky psychopath Dan Andrews.
When the data were analysed, several disturbing findings emerged.
Myocarditis and Pericarditis
Administration of all three vaccines significantly increased the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis. After the first and second Pfizercarditis shots, the OE ratios for myocarditis were 2.78 and 2.86, respectively. The risk remained doubled after the third and fourth shots.
The first and second Moderna shots, meanwhile, delivered alarming OE ratios for myocarditis of 3.48 and 6.10, respectively.
The mainstream has done its best to reframe myocarditis as a usually "mild and transient" condition. The mainstream, of course, thrives on misleading people. Myocarditis is an inflammation of the myocardium, the middle muscular layer of the heart wall. The condition may be acute and resolve quickly, or it may be chronic. Interestingly, the American Heart Association defines "chronic" as lasting longer than two weeks, which means most of the case reports of vaxxx-related myocarditis are chronic as all get out.
Just to be clear, we're not talking about a sprained ankle here. In severe cases, myocarditis can lead to stroke, heart attack, heart failure or death.
Which would really ruin your day. Especially when the cause was a drug that was never a vaccine (it's an out-and-out gene therapy) that you took in order to fight a virus that has never been isolated.
The third AstraZeneca shot delivered a heart-scorching OE ratio for pericarditis of 6.91, while doses 1 and 4 of the Moderna drug produced OE ratios of 1.74 and 2.64, respectively.
Pericarditis is inflammation of the pericardium, a sac-like structure that surrounds the heart. As with myocarditis, the condition can be acute or chronic. A common symptom of pericarditis is chest pain, the kind that feels like you're having a heart attack. Again, not a fun way to celebrate being Fauci-Ouchied against a virus that has never been shown to exist.
Blood Clots in the Brain
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis is a condition where blood clots form in the brain, greatly increasing the risk of a life-threatening hemorrhage. No-one wants that. Not even seaword, who already acts brain-dead.
Higher than expected rates of CVST were observed after the first dose of all three drugs, with an OE of 3.23 for the AstraZeneca shot. A statistically significant increase in CVST risk was also observed after the second Pfizer dose.
Nuking the Nervous System
The risk of suffering nasty neurological conditions was also greatly increased after receiving the 'vaccines.'
An OE ratio for Guillain-Barré syndrome of 2.49 was observed for the AstraZeneca clot shot, while the OE for transverse myelitis was almost doubled by the AZ shot.
Guillain-Barré syndrome is a normally rare disorder in which the body's immune system attacks the nerves. As the condition develops, it can eventually paralyze the entire body. Severe cases can be fatal. For those who survive, recovery may take up to several years, and some may suffer lasting effects, such as weakness, numbness or fatigue.
Transverse myelitis is no laughing matter either. It involves inflammation of the spinal cord, and can cause pain, muscle weakness, paralysis, sensory problems, or bladder and bowel dysfunction.
Uncontrollably shitting one’s pants to avoid getting the sniffles? I’ll pass.
If treated early, some people can experience a complete or near complete recovery. Other patients may never show signs of recovery. Those who do experience partial or complete recovery can expect the process to take up to two years.
In the case of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, OE ratios of 3.78 and 2.23 were observed for the Moderna and AstraZeneca vaxxxines, respectively.
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis is an autoimmune disease marked by sudden, widespread inflammation in the brain and spinal cord. It results in damage to the myelin sheath surrounding and protecting nerve cells. It affects mostly children and a clue as to why has somehow made it past the censors at Wikipedia, which admits (as of this writing) the cause of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis "is often a trigger such as from viral infection or vaccinations."
Most children make a complete or nearly complete recovery from ADEM, although it can take up to a year for symptoms to resolve. Some patients have ongoing symptoms such as blurred vision, weakness, numbness and/or incoordination.
Not something any innocent child should have to suffer through. Yet another reason why, when the government and drug companies ask you to serve up your kids in order to save grandma from a non-existent virus, you should immediately and emphatically tell them to self-fornicate.
The Current Excess Mortality Situation
Numerous commentators, including yours truly, have written previously about the striking increase in excess mortality seen around the world since the vaxxx rollout.
Australia, a highly-vaxxxed country where people love to do as they are told while bizarrely viewing themselves as a bunch of knockabout renegades, is a classic example.
During 2022, there was a 15.3% increase in mortality compared to the Australian baseline average - a jump in death rates not seen since World War II.
As of this writing, Australian mortality statistics for 2023 have been compiled for the period up to November 30. They show that excess mortality is still 10% above the baseline average. That's 15,114 excess deaths - the equivalent of a Boeing 747 full of passengers crashing every week for 33 weeks straight.
Meanwhile, the terminally corrupt, industry-funded TGA (Australian for FDA, mate!) is still sticking to its absurd story that it has only "identified 14 reports where the cause of death was linked to vaccination."
The TGA clearly isn't looking very hard. More like looking the other way.
Oh, did I mention that the TGA is an intensely pro-pharma arm of the Corporation, oops, Commonwealth of Australia, that receives 96% of its funding from industry?
The ABS mortality stats show that while diagnoses of the renamed flu called COVID are down, deaths due to respiratory diseases in November 2023 were 13% above baseline average and 6% higher than in 2022.
Take a drug that supposedly protects you against a deadly respiratory infection, only to suffer a higher risk of deadly respiratory infection?
If that doesn't show what an egregious farce the COVID vaxxx campaign is, I don't know what does.
Cancer deaths also appear to be on the rise. Deaths from cancer up to November 2023 were 6.9% above baseline; during 2022, they were 6% above baseline.
The death toll from several other causes receded from 2022 levels, but still remained above baseline.
Deaths due to dementia up to the end of November 2023 remained 11.7% above baseline.
Deaths due to other cardiac causes (not including ischaemic heart disease) were 11% above baseline, while deaths due to diabetes were 15.4% above the baseline average.
In a finding that will no doubt delight the feminazis, the male death rate for all age groups was higher than the female death rate, with the largest rate ratio seen in the youngest age group and smallest in the oldest age group.
Male Privilege™, baby!
We Are The World, We Are The Prey
Australia is hardly alone in its post-vaxxx plight.
The Economist constructed a machine-learning model to estimate the number of excess deaths during the 'pandemic' for 223 countries and regions, from which they calculate a global figure.
Globally, the model estimates that the total number of excess deaths is a multiple of the reported number of 'confirmed' deaths due to COVID-19.
The supposed number of 'confirmed' COVID deaths from January 1, 2020 through February 18, 2024 is 7.03 million.
The Economist model's central estimate for excess global mortality is 28.54 million deaths, with lower and upper bounds of 18.48 and 35.22 million deaths, respectively.
This means that even if you believe in the Easter Bunny, Tooth Fairy and Sars-Cov-2, in The Economist's central estimate COVID deaths only account for a quarter of excess global mortality.
For those of us who don't recognize statistics based on things that don't exist, it is important to reiterate there is no such thing as a “confirmed” COVID case.* Confirmation of something that doesn't exist is an inherent absurdity.
I have explained here and here that Sars-Cov-2 is a mythical entity that has never been isolated by anything resembling valid science.
The PCR test that supposedly detects Sars-Cov-2 is a non-specific fraud.
I have also explained here why the alleged death toll from 'COVID' is a bald-faced fraud, where everything from heart attacks to kidney failure to murder-suicides were reclassified as 'COVID' deaths in order to generate the appearance of a pandemic.
Which means whatever the exact excess global mortality since January 2020 is, it is caused almost entirely by the vaxxxines, with a helping hand from inappropriate intubation, patient-culling use of midazolam and remdesivir, and the physical and mental consequences of ‘emergency’ tyranny.
Let's Stop Pretending We Don't Know the Cause
None of this should come as a surprise to anyone. The recent GCoVS paper and continuing excess mortality are confirmation of what should already be common knowledge. The COVID gene therapies, fraudulently promoted as vaccines, established a reputation early on for causing heart damage and clot-bombing people's blood vessels. The stories about 'turbo cancers' look to be more than just anecdotal tales going by the post-vaxxx elevations in cancer deaths. It was also known early on that adverse event databases in the UK, US, Australia and Europe quickly evinced alarming, skyward jumps in 'vaccine'-related incidents.
Governments and corporate media outlets, working in preorchestrated lockstep, portrayed the sudden rise in sudden death as a remarkable coincidence. No way could it be the toxic injections they had brainwashed and bullied the world into receiving; instead, they blamed everything from climate change to referee's whistles.
Trusting people who are known to lie for a living, and taking drugs with a penchant for causing heart damage and life-threatening blood clots, in the hope of avoiding a re-badged flu whose 'victims' outlived the average national life expectancy, is the epitome of reckless irrationality.
Whether Planet Numbnut has learned anything from the last four years remains to be seen. All indications are that we are going to be subjected to a similar stunt again. The Globalist cabal are already warning (threatening) us of "Disease X", the mysterious pathogen that doesn't yet exist but will, we are assured, strike soon and cause mayhem.
Stop, for a moment, and think about the inherent absurdity in that claim.
They really do think we are stupid. It’s a pity so much of humanity seems hellbent on proving them correct.
Just like COVID-19, Disease X will be a pre-orchestrated scamdemic years in the making, motivated by the globalists' psychopathic fetish for population reduction (genocide), unfettered control and ever-increasing wealth.
Don’t be a seaword: Recognize when you are being screwed and do not comply with evil.
*The WHO criteria for a 'confirmed' Sars-Cov-2 case are:
A person with a positive PCR test "regardless of clinical criteria." So you could show absolutely no signs of respiratory illness, but if the deliberately flawed and fraudulent Sars-Cov-2 PCR test says you have Sars-Cov-2, then congratulations - you're a 'case.'
A person meeting "clinical criteria," which are:
"acute onset of fever AND cough";
OR
"acute onset of ANY THREE OR MORE of the following signs or symptoms: fever, cough, general weakness/fatigue, headache, myalgia, sore throat, coryza, dyspnoea, nausea/diarrhoea/anorexia."
All the above symptoms characterize any number of respiratory and non-respiratory conditions that have nothing to do with fantasy viruses allegedly emanating from a Chinese biolab/wet market/bat/pangolin (four-and-a-half years in, and the geniuses promoting this farce still haven't made up their minds).
A person meeting "Epidemiological criteria," which is "contact of a probable or confirmed case, or linked to a COVID-19 cluster" plus a "a positive professional-use or self-test" SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test. The RAT test is “less sensitive” at detecting the non-existent Sars-Cov-2 than the fraudulent Sars-Cov-2 PCR test, but not to worry, you can always confirm the results of an unreliable RAT test by performing a fraudulent Sars-Cov-2 PCR test!
I need a drink.
I don’t need a drink because reading your work is much better medicine. Thank you for the clarity and humor while addressing this staggeringly evil reality.
A large part of Americans who were vaccinated were vaccinated against their will so they could return to work and feed their families. Shame!
I lost my job of 23 years, and my bf lost his job of 17 years. I went a step further, and I was the first to say no to the CONvid test (a carcinogen). Some people where I worked didn’t even know why they never saw me again. I wasn’t even allowed to go to my locker and get my belongings.
I got sent home, and retired 3 years early.
These people are evil mf’s. If you’re not awake now…
I’m so sorry to hear of your situation. Prayers to you and your family. Here’s our story.
Circa 2021: My wife and I built a cardiac and orthopedic device business from scratch and it cost us 100k to build (which took 20 years) and it all got wiped away because we refused to take the GENE ALTERING SHOT for the hospitals and corporations that we served. We were thrown away like trash and out of the hundreds of friends and acquaintances, I can count on one hand who actually gave a shit. We’re ALL being targeted for genocide and extinction and I think what is going on in Palestine is a test run for what these satanic bastards have in store for us in the USA. Everything has been planned-EVERYTHING IS CONNECTED. Protect your health at all costs. GODSPEED and much love and empathy wished to all including those who have been murdered which includes 8 of my loved ones.. THEY ALL TOOK THE GENE ALTERING SHOT AND THEY ALL DIED SUDDENLY.
Dear God in Heaven! I have no words JC!
All I can say, right now, is that the Will Of God is being done, in ways that our souls do not understand, yet. I believe in Universal Law. For every action, there is a reaction…for good and bad.
Some of us had a “knowing”, and some were deceived, and were denied truth. I know their souls are helped on the other side. The angels of God are with them.
We, now, must stand with the Light of God, and fight against evil.
That is our job now. We are here for a reason.
God be with you JC, and guide you, in Jesus Christ’s name. Amen
Thank you. The light always wins and the dark always loses…I feel the light and divine intervention. God bless you and peace be with you.
Peace be with you.
Dear JC and Renee Marie,
sorry to hear what you went through, these kinds of stories invariably make my blood boil.
Stay strong,
People used to say, “I wonder what I would have done in Germany’s WWII?”
Now you know. Brutal, with a lot of Truth.
The trouble with that ‘satanic’ plan is that at least 15% of people worldwide seem to be almost *fully* awake as to what’s happening.
The veteran blogger John Ward put it at one in eight. That was at least two years ago. See https://therealslog.com/.
We all know that many people will go along with anything their boss insists on, or for that matter ‘the authorities’. The ‘awkward squad’ can’t be controlled so easily.
Finally the USA has the 2A. 250 years ago some far-sighted people said ‘what if the government ever goes rogue?’ Now it has done.
In Europe, Switzerland possibly has just as high a rate of gun ownership. The country’s defence policy has been ‘armed neutrality’ for centuries. It’s a very peaceful and socially stable place, but stability and self-defence by (almost) every citizen can go together.
Like my daughter in the military.
no one wins. i wanted to be wrong so bad.
I know that feeling!
Do you honestly mean you’re not ‘Bat Crazy’ and unable to delude yourself
into ‘wishful thinking’?
The Global COVID Vaccine Safety (GCoVS) Project under the Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) conducted a comprehensive study to evaluate the risk of adverse events of special interest (AESI) following COVID-19 vaccination1. The study included 99,068,901 vaccinated individuals across eight countries.
The study observed the rates of 13 selected AESI across neurological, hematological, and cardiac outcomes up to 42 days following vaccination with mRNA (BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273) and adenovirus-vector (ChAdOx1) vaccines. The risks were assessed using observed versus expected (OE) ratios with 95% confidence intervals.
The study found that OE ratios with lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (LBCI) greater than 1.5 were observed for Guillain-Barré syndrome and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis following the first dose of ChAdOx1 vaccine. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis showed an OE ratio of 3.78 following the first dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine. The OE ratios for myocarditis and pericarditis following BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and ChAdOx1 were significantly increased with LBCIs > 1.5.
This multi-country analysis confirmed pre-established safety signals for myocarditis, pericarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Other potential safety signals that require further investigation were identified.
It’s important to note that while these adverse events are statistically significant, they are still very rare. The benefits of vaccination in preventing severe illness, death, and lingering long COVID symptoms far outweigh these small risks. The vaccines have been administered globally over the past three years, saving over 1 million lives in Europe alone.
There was no pandemic or public health emergency of any kind.
You’ve been lied to & like many you’ve accepted the lies. But they are lies.
https://odysee.com/@jermwarfare:2/Denis-Rancourt-all-cause-mortality:e
The injections were designed intentionally to cause injury, deaths and reduce fertility in survivors.
https://2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DEC2020_EN_unsigned_with_Exhibits.pdf
https://rumble.com/v3zq2jj-mike-yeadon-address-to-parliamentary-special-meeting-4122023.html
“The vaccines have been administered globally over the past three years, saving over 1 million lives in Europe alone.”
There is no evidence to support that. All the evidence points to a mass homicide.
https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=130&name=2023_06_22_there_was_no_pandemic_essay
The claim that COVID-19 vaccines have saved over 1 million lives in Europe is supported by a study from the WHO European Region. According to this study, COVID-19 vaccinations have reduced deaths due to the pandemic by at least 57%, saving more than 1.4 million lives in the region1. Most of those saved were aged 60 or older, the group at highest risk of severe illness and death from the virus. The first vaccine booster alone saved 700,000 lives. These findings are consistent with the known benefits of vaccination in preventing severe illness and death from COVID-19.
It’s important to rely on peer-reviewed studies and official health organization reports when evaluating claims about public health measures. The WHO and other health authorities have consistently emphasized the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines based on extensive research and data analysis.
If you have concerns about vaccine safety or efficacy, it’s recommended to consult with healthcare professionals or refer to the latest research from reputable sources. It’s crucial to critically evaluate information, especially when it pertains to health and safety.
The essay titled “There Was No Pandemic” by Denis G. Rancourt, PhD, presents a controversial view that contradicts the consensus of the global scientific community and public health organizations. Dr. Rancourt argues that there was no pandemic and attributes excess mortality to other causes. However, this perspective is not supported by the vast majority of scientific research and data.
The World Health Organization (WHO), along with numerous health authorities worldwide, have recognized COVID-19 as a global pandemic, with extensive evidence showing its impact on health systems, economies, and daily life. The pandemic’s existence is supported by a significant body of research, including peer-reviewed studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses that document the clinical symptoms, transmission, and effects of the virus.
It’s important to critically evaluate all sources of information, especially those that challenge established scientific understanding. For accurate and up-to-date information on COVID-19 and related public health guidance, it’s recommended to refer to reputable sources such as the WHO or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
“The claim that COVID-19 vaccines have saved over 1 million lives in Europe is supported by a study from the WHO European Region. ”
Where is that study?
Is it this one?
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.12.24301206v1
If so, surely you can see from the description of the method that this is rubbish? It is little more than estimating the effectiveness of the vaccine (using very little verifiable evidence) and multiplying by the number of doses given.
Or are you AI?
“Methods We estimated the number of lives directly saved by age-group, vaccine dose and circulating Variant of Concern (VOC) period, both regionally and nationally, using weekly data on COVID-19 mortality and COVID-19 vaccine uptake reported by 34 CAT, and vaccine effectiveness (VE) data from the literature. We calculated the percentage reduction in the number of expected and reported deaths.”
As soon as a scientist claims consensus we know he detests science.
Which ignorance so often shouts into the lonely darkness, so very often to the point of being cliche;.
Scientific consensus is not about personal beliefs; it’s the collective judgment, position, and opinion of the scientific community as a whole. It represents a synthesis of evidence and is often used to inform policy decisions and public understanding. While science always welcomes questioning and skepticism as part of the scientific method, consensus arises when the evidence overwhelmingly supports a particular viewpoint, such as in the cases of climate change or vaccine safety. It’s important to differentiate between healthy skepticism, which is a part of scientific discourse, and the outright denial of empirical evidence.
You write: “Scientific consensus is not about personal beliefs; it’s the collective judgment, position, and opinion of the scientific community as a whole.”
Consensus is irrelevant.
Consensus is simply the majority opinion.
Science is not a popularity contest. What is factual is not determined by majority opinion, especially in a world where most people have the backbone of a wet noodle and where researchers go along with whatever agenda is being pushed by whoever is paying their salary and research grants.
I’m not interested in opinions, I’m interested in facts.
So let’s see some facts from you.
You support the ridiculous claim that the vaxxxines have saved over 1 million lives.
So let’s see the evidence. By evidence, I do not mean opinion statements (consensus) by globalist outfits like the WHO, or propaganda from corrupt, industry-funded outfits like the CDC.
I want data from controlled clinical trials of the vaxxxines, which you pro-vaxxx types were so fond of citing until it became clear those trials were a shmozzle.
Numerous clinical trials have been conducted, and not one of them could show that the vaxxxines were capable of saving a single life. And that, I remind you, was in trials conducted by the drug companies themselves, all of which showed evidence of non-blinding and, in the case of the Pfizer trial, outright fraud.
The Pfizer trial, in fact, showed a higher death rate in the vaxxx group than in the placebo group.
So please explain to me just how a vaxxx campaign comprised of drugs shown to be useless, a campaign whose star drug actually showed more deaths in its clinical trial, saved 1 million lives??
Please explain, I’m all ears.
Once again, I’m not interested in consensus statements from the same bureaucrat and research community that has lied through its teeth and got everything wrong over the last 4 years.
I’m not interested in prose about “shouting into the lonely darkness” or other such codswallop.
Your time starts now.
Well said, Anthony Colpo. Spoken like a true man of science, one I can respect.
You write: “The essay titled ‘There Was No Pandemic’ by Denis G. Rancourt, PhD, presents a controversial view that contradicts the consensus of the global scientific community and public health organizations.”
Which means he’s almost certainly right.
You are defining yourself as a fool at this point.
Your comment seems to imply you trust Denis G. Rancourt more than the Global SCIENTIFIC community and public health organizations, a fallacious argument which assumes someone’s expertise or credentials in one field automatically make them right in another field.
Denis G. Rancourt is a former professor of physics who has been involved in several conflicts with his former employer, the University of Ottawa, over issues such as academic freedom, grading, and dismissal. He is not a medical doctor or an epidemiologist, and his views on COVID-19 are not supported by the majority of scientific evidence.
Therefore, it is not reasonable to conclude that he is “almost certainly right” about the pandemic, especially when his claims contradict the overwhelming consensus of experts who have studied the virus, its transmission, its impact, and its prevention.
That comment was a tongue-in-cheek quip highlighting the fact that “the Global SCIENTIFIC community and public health organizations” has gotten pretty much EVERYTHING wrong over the last four years.
Not my problem if you completely lack a sense of humour.
You define yourself as just another cognitive dissonant who, when called to provide evidence for his untenable claims, cannot do so and instead resorts to ad hominem snipes.
The best you can do is to start calling me names. Wow, that’s powerful, JZ.
I asked you to provide controlled evidence showing the vaxxxines could save even a single life, let alone 1 million, and you completely fail to do so.
You and I both know that is because there is NO evidence. As I have stated umpteen times, in the Pfizer trial, the vaxxx group experienced a higher death rate than the placebo group.
I asked you to refrain from wanking on about consensus, which is just majority opinion. So what do you do? You continue to wank on about consensus. LOL
Thank you for confirming the “1 million lives saved” claim is untenable nonsense for which you cannot provide a skerrick of actual evidence.
Naw, I just didn’t catch that, Apologies. 🙂 I didn’t call you a name. I said you were self defining.
You’re sharing ignorance in counter positions.
Which is fine. Peer reviewed science requires dissenters.
But when sharing it without qualifiers, to a public looking for things to support their misapprehensions and personal beliefs not supported by facts or reality but an info bubble, that is the problem I’m seeing here.
But hey, enjoy. It attracts followers.
You’re really getting boring.
You share baseless opinions, and when I repeatedly ask you to provide scientific data to support those opinions, you completely fail to do so.
You then have the temerity to accuse me of “sharing ignorance in counter positions” and “sharing it without qualifiers.”
Says the ignorant guy who thinks majority opinion constitutes scientific data, who can’t provide even an ounce of evidence to support the absurd contention that the toxic clot shots have somehow saved 1 million lives.
I have provided an abundance of evidence to support my position – the fact that you deliberately ignore it does not change the fact that it exists and supports what I am saying.
Your position is nothing other than “personal beliefs not supported by facts or reality but an info bubble.”
Perhaps best to stay in that bubble, because all you’re doing here is repeatedly confirming you have no science to back your absurd claims.
Once again, thank you for confirming pro-vaxxx dogmatists like yourself completely lack data to support their stance. You must instead rely on diversion, personal attacks and appeals to authority.
Powerful lol
My research shows the historic justification for vaccinations is pure fabrication. Proof?… just look up pre-1960 Public Health Exams, which I passed twice. Disease mitigation was achieved with 1880s sewerage schemes, drinking water resevoirs, public hygiene measures and education, slum eradication, improved nutrition, and dozens of other public health measures. Statistics show vaccines contributed nothing. The major vaccination programmes of 1934 produced the first case of autism and many other injuries that have increased in tandem with increased vaccinations. Unvaccinated kids are healthier, more intelligent, and none have autism. Murdock, you are a liar. You can lie to young people who have no knowledge of history but on the ancient, like me, who have perfect memories, all you achieve is identification with democide.
Decision-makers saw the damage in early 2021 and continued to promote and sometimes mandate the injections. Anyone who had authority and did that committed a crime. Case closed.
It’s even worse than that.
I’m a former career length research executive in Pfizer Respiratory products.
These injections were designed intentionally to injure, kill and reduce fertility in survivors.
I warned in writing that this would happen BEFORE any obtained their fraudulent “emergency use authorizations”, which themselves are a novel, absurdly dangerous idea, never used before.
If these agents were for the purposes you were told, they would not even be offered to younger people or those who claim to have had the virus, and definitely not to pregnant women.
We ended up injecting babies.
The entire event is faked & among the reasons was to inject 5.5 billion people with something known to have potential toxicity and which had no possible benefit to recipients.
Why do you believe they did it?
I honestly don’t know.
The best fit explanation it seems to me is that it’s truly diabolical.
I think this is only part 1 of a relentless attack that either we win, or they trap us all and kill most.
Just opinion.
Dr. Mike. You are over the target. These monsters (Bill Gates and co.) are eugenicists and they happen to own everything.
Here’s how they rolled it out in the beginning:
Covid was developed by the Pentagon and released near Ft Detrick Maryland. The first people that got the non-mutated real deal had their lungs “fill up with glass” and it all got blamed on e-cigarettes. Anyone remember that? How e-cigs got blamed??? That happened MONTHS before there was any mention at all about a lab in Wuhan, and when it was mentioned, there were 7 total variants in the U.S. with only 3 variants in China. That again proves the virus was released in the US, and the Pentagon had a “vax” ready to go. Only it was not a vax, it was the second kill wave shot.
It is obvious America’s own government wanted whatever it was to spread by blaming e-cigarettes at first, and at “the right time” they were going to suddenly announce it was in fact a new virus, to scare the hell out of the public. People were really supposed to be dying in droves everywhere. But the mutations castrated the virus and it failed early on and that saved everyone who was smart enough to realize not enough people were dying to justify a shot.
Rancourt has the best explanation I have heard. The pandemic is all part of a worldwide power struggle. The elite benefits from concentrating power in its hands, while removing it from everyone else.
https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=23&name=2019_04_02_geo_economics_and_geo_politics_drive_successive_eras_of_predatory_globalization_and_social_engineering_historical_emergence_of_climate_change_gender_equity_and_anti_racism_as_state_doctrines
I think it all comes back to the motive put forward by Reiner Fuellmich in his Covid-19 crimes against humanity trial: https://metatron.substack.com/p/reiner-fuellmichs-grand-jury-court.
The global establishment is terrified that the $trillions and €trillions of fiat money debt they have run up is going to lead to the mother of all financial crashes. They want to get the general public fitted into digital straitjackets and completely under their control by whatever means they can before that event kicks off.
You are definitely right, but the scamdemic was planned even before 1934.
There are two aspects to this.
1. It was done to seek to impose control over the masses by creating chaos, stealing all the wealth whilst harming and murdering as collateral.
2. To wake people up to what has really been going on for a great many years and expose the evil ones in the world. This has been done by carrying out the Great Vaccine Experiment to prove once and for all that it really isn’t a Good Idea to inject vaccines into humans or animals in the name of future good health.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/covid-19-summary/
Hi Dr Mike,
just want to say it’s a pleasure and honour to see you here!
You can count me among the many, many people who admire you greatly for having the will and courage to speak out early on, when professionally it would have been easier for you to just shake your head and keep quiet.
Keep it coming,
Anthony.
Dr Yeadon: I agree. Thanks very much indeed for your work. I woke up well in advance of the UK medical system trying to inject us all … it failed miserably, at least 15% of NHS workers probably refused.
I wish I could have a chat around a table about world resource shortages, especially fossil fuels, and the likely reasons why TPTB hatched this diabolical plan. It must have been underway for decades. Anyway I regularly follow blogs/websites that discuss such things, e.g. Our Finite World, Surplus Energy Economics, Consciousness of Sheep, the Great Simplification, Clusterfuck Nation, etc.
I respect your opinion. I do not however share it.
Even if some resources might become limiting, mass murder by entitled ghouls isn’t in the least justified (not that I think you’d implied it).
Thank you, Anthony, that means a lot. Much appreciated, Mike
Michael Eadon is one of the few scientists that can question the viral dogma of respiratory diseases.. As Anthony Colpo has shown in his articles, the notion that a killer microbe emerged from Wuhan in late 2019 is a load of BS..
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/peer-reviewed-fact-what-they-are?publication_id=1328095&post_id=117812159&isFreemail=false&triedRedirect=true
I loved every word of this article. I have now forwarded it to the Pm who STILLLLLL believe the vaxxes are “safe” and to our MP, for east Devon, who seems to just follow the party line. I would add one more thing to the paragraph below. And the medical negligence of doctors who told their patients to stay home til their lips turned blue and the doctors who, did not prescribe an antibiotic for secondary bacterial infection of the lungs, known as pneumonia. Many elderly died due to a treatable condition.
Which means whatever the exact excess global mortality since January 2020 is, it is caused almost entirely by the vaxxxines, with a helping hand from inappropriate intubation, patient-culling use of midazolam and remdesivir, and the physical and mental consequences of ‘emergency’ tyranny
I am sure the ‘Hi risk anus’ a.k.a Rishi Sunak knows they are dangerous but he hasn’t made enough money yet or left the country.
As for midazolam.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/care-homes-and-midazolam-the-murder
WHO decided the 42 day cut-off, and why isn’t it in the title?
Also, when were the subjects considered ‘vaccinated’? From the date of their jab or a couple of weeks later?
Whatever, there is no way this ‘study’ even comes close to the actual damage caused.
Hi KarlM,
day 0 of the 0-42 day follow-up period was the date of receipt of the vaxxxine, so at least they didn’t pull the ol’ swifty of not counting recipients as being vaccinated until 14 days after their second dose.
After reading the study and the protocol (https://web.archive.org/web/20240223114509/https://www.globalvaccinedatanetwork.org/sites/globalvaccinedatanetwork.org/files/2024-01/GVDN-observed-vs.-expected-analyses-of-COVID-19-vaccine-AESI-V1.4.pdf) I’m still not entirely sure why they chose a 42-day cut-off.
It may be that this was the longest period for which they had the most ready-to-analyze data. It is ostensibly an ongoing project, so hopefully there will be follow-up papers reporting on longer follow-up durations.
And yes, I agree this study doesn’t nearly capture the full extent of the damage wreaked by these toxic shots.
Ah, thanks for the info. I guess it would have been a tad too far, even for them, to knock 14 days off an already meagre 42 day ‘study’.
Does it even capture 0.1% of the harms? At least, looking at deaths recorded by MCM or Dr. Makis, most seem to be >1yr past their last shot. Though, perhaps explained by the current reluctance to the shots.
Another trick they’ve done here is to narrow down the SAEs to a select few categories. I believe in the Pfizer trial they did the same, some 6000 gastrointestinal SAEs were ignored because there was no category for those.
To be fair to the researchers, 99 million participants is a serious chunk of data to work through. This study prioritized potential safety signals that had arisen from pre-existing data. Had they tried to analyze all the side effects linked to the poison darts, I imagine we’d still be waiting a while longer for a paper.
One thing conspicuous by its absence, however, is mortality data. Hopefully we get a paper from this project on that soon.
42 is the ultimate answer to everything which is why we see it rather more than usual.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/42-the-ultimate-answer-to-life-the-universe-and-everything/
Forgot about that. I really liked the book/film – was surprised at so many negative reviews.
Really, negative reviews? We had the series first on TV which was great fun. I then read the book and at least one other of Douglas Adams. He had great imagination.
Indeed, he did. It was the film I meant got a good few low scores. More than I would’ve expected, even for imbd. Maybe, the Yanks just don’t get it.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0371724/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0_tt_8_nm_0_q_hitchhi
Amazing how a LACK of data, and/or intentionally ignoring the actual data, somehow qualifies as “scientific” proof of “safety.”
Yeah, “The science (Fauci;-) tells us that jumping off a cliff is safe.”
Never-mind the meatgrinder below which is busy hiding the dead bodies. We’re censoring that as hard as we can, so it doesn’t count here.
We are still not answering the response normally given by the compliant thinkers, and that is ‘yes we know there are excess deaths and it’s obvious that they may be caused by the vaccines, but there would have been even more excess deaths (to Covid) if we hadn’t had the vaccine….’
we really need to get our thinking caps on
There was no pandemic or public health emergency & so nothing the not-vaccines could have saved anyone from.
https://correlation-canada.org/no-plague-mass-homicide-2020/
“There would have been more deaths if we had not had the vaccine”
That does not hold, because in many countries there were no excess deaths, even for months following the announcement of the pandemic. Deaths increased only after the vaccines were introduced. See the graphs for 95 countries here:
https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=134&name=2023_10_08_quantitative_evaluation_of_whether_the_nobel_prize_winning_covid_19_vaccine_actually_saved_millions_of_lives
An awesome summary and grim prediction of what’s ahead….thank you!
“Tested in large clinical trials” – Not Pfizer. They did the bait and switch. The product they tested on 22,000 people was NOT the product they injected into everyone.
Naomi Wolf has an interview with Dr. Chris Flowers about the “bait & switch” found in the FOIA docs:
https://dailyclout.io/war-room-dailyclout-pfizer-documents-researcher-finds-secret-pfizer-trial/
And the report about it:
https://dailyclout.io/pfizer-process-2-vaccine-had-2-4-times-adverse-events/
European Medicines Agency and the FDA knew about it in 2020 and allowed the product to go through.
And on the confirmation of foreign DNA in the shots getting inside the cells of your organs here is the Sept 13, 2023 testimony by Professor Dr. Phillip Buckhaults (University of South Carolina) as he testifies before South Carolina Senate Medical Affairs Ad-Hoc Committee on DHEC.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEWHhrHiiTY
This is good, but the authors themselves are firmly pulling their punches. They conclude:
“While our study confirmed previously identified rare safety signals following COVID-19 vaccination and contributed evidence on several other important outcomes, further investigation is warranted to confirm associations and assess clinical significance. ”
So Denis Rancourt’s studies remain far and away the most powerful exposure of this grotesque crime against humanity.
Sadly this is par for the course in the literature. Whenever their findings go against mainstream beliefs or against the agenda of their paymasters, many researchers will default to downplaying their own findings and/or calling for more research even when the end conclusion is quite obvious.
I gather that, in order to pass peer review and get the statistics into the public domain, many scientists feel they must twist the conclusion in this way.
Fine writing and brought a smile, thank you. re. fantasy ‘X’.
“…we are assured, strike soon and cause mayhem.”
Nope. Anymore than “COVID” and orchestrated “case” numbers did.
It will simply once again become a matter of policy, psycho-theatre and misdirection reinforced by the usual array of incarcerating measures.
Only then will we see the full force of, ‘once bitten, twice shy” and “fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.” For my money it’ll be pitch-forks at dawn. Put people into a corner with nothing left to lose, then watch the fun evolve.
LOL. If I may be so crude as to transpose… kill or be killed.
You mentioned Australia’s penchant for docility. There is a reason. Rupert Murdoch was invited to join David Rockefeller’s new world takeover programme in 1973. This got off the ground in 1975 and, at the end of that year, Gough was sacked before he could spill the beans in Parliament about prominant CIA agents here (Hawke, Anthony, Tange, Stalling, Ables). Within 15 years, the country was run by a triumvirate of Rupert Murdoch, Frank Lowy, and Ross Garnaut. By then Rupert owned 70% of print media and controlled 99%. The mind control had commenced. But Oz was the experimental field. Today, since David died in 2017, Rupert has been global king pin. Ever wondered why Schwarb, Gates, Fauci, Tedros, Harari etc are dangled before us? Bait mate. Murdoch presents as grumpy old man and retired, but do not believe a word of it. He was annointed as global leader by David in the early 70s and this was endorsed by the City of London. The scamdemic was a media-driven event.
Disease X ??? Don’t make me laugh.
https://i.postimg.cc/3RwZmJ4Q/Mr-Rogers-Not-Taking-Vax-For-Disease-X.png
The silver lining here is that there are millions upon millions of ‘seawords’ …. who are either dead or living with serious Rat Juice injuries…. the injured mostly are unaware that the Rat Juice is the cause…
And they continue to believe the Juice of Rat is Safe and Effective… and they will head to the clinic about now — for the new booster.
I cannot say I am not delighted by this compounding stupidity.
I stopped believing the establishment when they reported that an airliner had penetrated a skyscraper wall – – –
Just like a hot knife through butter . . .
Yes, and when WTC7 inexplicably collapsed after being hit by … nothing. I guess it just “fainted” when it saw what happened to its two bigger brothers!
Great article, thank you very much. Morgan Sloss is a dead Sloss! In fact her name anagrams to ‘morons slags’ or if you prefer ‘SS moron slag’.
Guillain-Barré syndrome is a made up name to cover neurological disease generally and make it seem that doctors and medical researchers are terribly clever. As opposed to just terrible.
As regards ‘Follow the science’ the name gives the game away.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/follow-the-science
You’re welcome Baldmichael, and may I say you have quite the knack for anagrams 🙂
Thank you! It is a good anagram program plus persistence and practice as much as anything.
Thanks Anthony for your article. I have recently found your Substack and learn new information all the time. I tried to get my 83y/o mum not to keep taking the clot shot but she believed her GP was God. She died suddenly of a massive brain bleed. She remained in a coma for 6 days before they injected her with a big dose of medazalam. I still miss her.