Addressing the latest "but he really was shot!" theory doing the rounds.
Regarding what really happened on September 10 at Utah Valley University, there’s a new theory gaining traction. It holds that Kirk was shot by one of his own security guys, who did the dirty deed using a tiny “palm protector” pistol.
Before we take a look at the video used to support this claim, let’s do a quick 101 on the palm protector genre of firearms.
Rather than the usual trigger mechanism, the palm protector featured a unique grip design which was fired by squeezing. Most reportedly used an extra-short .32 caliber cartridge, but were also made in both .41 and .22 calibers.
The palm protector design was developed in the late 1800s by a French inventor, and later licensed to the Minneapolis Firearms Company. The patent was later purchased by another American, who formed the Chicago Firearms Company and produced a slightly larger version. By 1910, the initial Chicago inventory had been sold and the design was abandoned. Remington reportedly manufactured their own version until 1920. Thanks to the wonders of technology, it is possible to make 3D printed versions of these pistols (don’t try this at home).
So was a version of this old design used to ‘assassinate’ Charlie Kirk? A lot of people seem to think so, based on the following video:
Khaki Green Shirt Guy With Sunglasses does indeed make a suspicious hand movement that coincides with the sound of gunshot (note also the guy to the left of the screen who shortly before all this happens, leans forward and appears to make a signalling motion with his forearm).
There does indeed seem to be a gap between this guy’s middle and ring fingers, consistent with something protruding between them, although you can’t actually see what that something is.
That it was unlikely to have been a palm protector pistol is evinced by two things.
The first is the closeness of that gap, which is inconsistent with pictures of people holding an actual palm protector pistol.
The second obvious anomaly is the complete lack of a flash at the moment of firing, evident in the videos below posted by people not crisis-acting as Kirk security:
That alone makes the palm protector gun theory untenable.
The other consideration is that the palm protector design was meant to be employed at very close range. It is not a design that lends itself to reliably hitting a low probability target like the neck from 15-20 feet away.
Granted, Khaki Green Shirt Guy With Sunglasses may have been unusually gifted in the use of said device, but the consequences of him missing his shot were simply too high. Missing Kirk would likely have meant shooting someone else, including fellow crisis actor Dark Shirt Guy With Sunglasses Making Suspicious Hand Signal.
Kirk had to ‘die’ as part of this B-grade endeavor, in order to incite anger, resentment, calls for revenge and, of course, new laws.
Had Khaki Green Shirt Guy With Sunglasses missed Kirk, the sound of gunshot would have sent his target scrambling for cover, and there goes the psy-op. Had Kirk sat upright waiting for a second shot, it would have made this already ridiculous caper even more absurd-looking. We’re talking Guinness Book of World Records-level absurd.
So why did Khaki Green Shirt Guy With Sunglasses make his suspicious hand movement after Dark Shirt Guy With Sunglasses gave his hand signal?
One possibility is that he was mimicking the action of firing a palm protector gun to create a counter-conspiracy theory.
The other is that he was wielding a remote control and activating a blood squib or whatever contraption was hiding underneath Kirk’s t-shirt - you know, the one that did that bizarre bouncy boogaloo when he was supposedly ‘shot’.
Yet another possibility is a combination of both these factors: Khaki Green Shirt Guy With Sunglasses activated the squib, and was deliberately captured on camera so that a counter-theory involving a tiny gun could be circulated.
I find it highly suspicious that, of all the hundreds of people attending this event in this day and age of phone cameras, there has been such a dearth of footage from different sources.
But now here we are, with decent quality footage from someone who was allowed to get reasonably close to Kirk, right up against the security barriers. This someone just happened to capture Khaki Green Shirt Guy With Sunglasses make a suspicious hand-squeezing movement right at the time Kirk supposedly got popped by a bullet.
What a fortuitous turn of events!
Or what a pre-orchestrated farce.
One of the best ways for bad actors to counter the opposing narrative is to control it.
There is no reason to accept that Kirk is dead, because we simply have no proof of this, just like we have no proof Epstein killed himself or was killed by others. All we have are official narratives that are utterly nonsensical and refuted by the details we have at hand.
However, the martyring of Charlie Kirk requires that we believe he’s dead. A supposed ‘conspiracy theory’ involving a treacherous security guy wielding a tiny hidden gun encourages supposedly skeptical people to maintain this belief.
Hence, people maintain their rage, their demand that government “do something”.
Skeptics are sent on a further wild goose chase, looking for supposedly anti-Kirk actors that don’t exist.
Laughably, some are pointing the finger at Israel, a country that Kirk vigorously defended right to the end (well, the official end). We’re supposed to believe that, despite his clear contempt for Palestinians and his constant excuse-making for the IDF, that Israel wanted to knock him off because of a handful of limp ‘anti-semitic’ remarks that weren’t even anti-semitic.
Sure thing.
Meanwhile, skeptical Kirk fans can still keep hating lefties and transgender folks because, hey, Charlie said they were bad and weird and shouldn’t be allowed to own guns and we need to honor Charlie because he’s a martyr.
Charlie Kirk was a sham, his lucrative ‘non-profit’ was a sham, and this entire shooting tale is a sham. That includes the palm protector pistol theory. It just doesn’t add up.
Note: Article was updated September 28, 2025, to include possibility that Khaki Green Shirt Guy With Sunglasses may have been wielding a remote control of some sort.
Nope not a chance of that really happened.
James Bond stuff… thanks for keeping it real.
“We’re supposed to believe that, despite his clear contempt for Palestinians and his constant excuse-making for the IDF, that Israel wanted to knock him off because”….
excellent – somebody finally pushed the envelope – now we’re back in Kansas, where anything can happen! You’re right. Epstein taken out of his cell and removed to his homeland. Kirk ditto.
It’s not a stretch. Not anymore. They can conjure up stuff that doesn’t just ‘defy’ reality, but remakes it, in any image they choose. Strapped down by their social media devices, helpless westerlings are given the impression that they can still ‘choose’ to believe or not believe.
“Christian zionists” are the ultimate dupes = led in Jonestown fashion to the bitter end that is mentioned by Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson* “Maimonides ruled that it is a rabbinic court — or a court appointed by rabbinic authority —that enforces obedience and passes judgment on gentiles, as well as promulgating legislation by court order for that purpose. Maimonides further decreed that any non-Jewish nation “not subject to our jurisdiction” (tahaht yadeinu) will be the target of Judaic holy war”
*Trimpf & Bobby Jr’s” controller
Because he turned on them. Do a bit more research.
He did no such thing. Do a bit more research.
“Because he turned on them” MEME ALERT!
Where’s all the ‘smooth operators?’ You guys thought you had this so sown up that everyone on the “A” team went on holiday to Jaffa?
He laughed when he talked about ethnic cleansing in Gaza and repeated that Palestine and Palestinians never existed. What kind of confrontation are you talking about? He is an ordinary actor and mercenary who gave monologues that someone else wrote for him. It is your right to believe in fairies, because everything that is shown violates all the laws of physics and physiology of the human body, as in the case of “Trump’s gunshot wound to the ear” and because he didn’t bleed, the first thing he asked was where his shoes were, the injury didn’t cause any of the expected problems and the 1.5 centimeter wound disappeared. That earlobe grew back like it never happened, because it didn’t. There are so many other issues that is unbelievable that someone can still believe it, but it is your right to believe in fairies.
Yeah, he’s either alive or got shot by a drone, cause I’ve seen videos of like 4 different people all supposedly firing a palm pistol from in front, behind, whatever. Which makes me think someone had 4 people pretend to fire a palm gun after those security dudes gave all those baseball signs.
No one was shot….but thanks for outing yourself.
Did you read the post?
First part of comment true second part shows what a dope you are
The sleazy Trump entwined background of The Widow is also very revealing.
Yes, very curious.
Your title should read “Was Charlie Kirk Shot?”
Best revealing video yet!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_ixRu7SmCE
And Anthony, it turns out that Charlie is not who he’s portrayed to be. Have you read Miles Mathis’s deep dive into Charlie Kirk’s fabricated bio?
https://mileswmathis.com/kirk.pdf
That classic Mathis “expose” is merely amusing – for the degree to which he exposes his ignorance of the entire phenomena of marrano cyrpto-judaism and the degree to which it has enveloped a polity which mistakenly believes itself some kind of “christian” majority.
Things came to a head with the supreme court appointee “Bret Kavanaugh whose ‘frat boy’ shenanigans earned him notoriety was exposed as yet another of the ‘fake catholics’ who’s sabbatean-frankist pedigree was as solid as that of John “Heinz” Kerry… another kraven kabbalist from Kavan.
Nobody paid any attention to these clear and obvious occurrences – leaving the territory open for minor league magus’s like Mike to enchant his groupies with astounding tales!
Well call me a groupie because I LOVE Miles Mathis because nobody DEEP dives and makes it interesting and engaging like Miles!
If you know of someone who does, please share!
I appreciate your detailed investigation but I’m left wondering if you’ve actually done a deep dive into Kirk’s actual talks. I’m no expert and never listened to him much but he comes across as sincere and kind. He is accused of being racist and hateful but is there actual evidence of this, or is it mostly short clips taken out of context? Also, if he is still alive what is his family doing? Will they ever be reunited? He seemed a genuinely happy good father. He claimed to be pursuing truth. He made many questioning statements about Israel over the last few months of his life. Could he have been realizing that the source of much of his foundational funding was tainted? I don’t claim to have answers – and we may never know – but these are questions I ponder. He may seem like a ‘Christian grifter’ to those unfamiliar with true Christians, but he comes across as genuine to me. That doesn’t make him perfect, just a flawed man seeking truth and adapting on his journey as he examines his motives and actions on a daily basis. We are all deceived in many ways. Our task is to live as authentically as possible in light of what God reveals to us daily.
Hi Becky,
“I’m no expert and never listened to him much but he comes across as sincere and kind … he comes across as genuine to me.”
Kirk was a top-to-bottom shonk, period.
Let’s start with his Turning Point USA ‘non-profit’, which made him fabulously wealthy. As a section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, it was NOT supposed to endorse political candidates nor devote “a substantial part of its activities … attempting to influence legislation (commonly known as lobbying). A 501(c)(3) organization may engage in some lobbying, but too much lobbying activity risks loss of tax-exempt status.”
https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/lobbying
TPUSA was NOTHING if not a lobbying outfit. But even after it was outed in 2017 for secretly funneling money to conservative student government campaigns, the IRS did diddly squat, supporting suspicions that Kirk and his for-profit were creations of someone far more powerful than himself.
https://web.archive.org/web/20240301202442/https://www.thelantern.com/2017/02/leaked-documents-audio-conservative-turning-point-usa-quietly-funding-student-government-campaigns-across-us/
I guess you could argue that someone who tried to convince the nation’s youngsters to vote for a bloated, dishonest, sleazy, orange sex predator piece of filth was “sincere”, “kind” and “genuine” … but I certainly wouldn’t.
I guess you could argue that someone who made no effort to hide his sheer contempt for Palestinians and who bent over backwards to rationalize away Israel’s inexcusable genocide was “sincere”, “kind” and “genuine” … but I certainly wouldn’t.
I guess you could argue that someone who as recently as May of this year became visibly angry when he was outpointed on these very views by Cambridge students had a change of heart … but I certainly wouldn’t.
I guess you could believe that he was changing his mind on Israel by virtue of statements he made in “private” to usual suspects like Candace Owens and the Furrowed Brow … but I certainly wouldn’t.
“Could he have been realizing that the source of much of his foundational funding was tainted?”
Because it took him over a decade to realize that the organization he fronted – which he already knew was a fraud – wasn’t making its hundreds of millions from selling “47” caps?
C’mon…
“Our task is to live as authentically as possible in light of what God reveals to us daily.”
I don’t know what your God reveals on a daily basis, but in my world, running fraudulent organizations, vocally praising child-killers, and campaigning for a guy who famously hung around with Jeffrey Epstein is just flat out wrong. No-one with an ounce of brains and decency needs a guy-in-the-sky to tell them this is not okay.
Kirk was an actor. He was groomed from a young age to play a role. On September 10, we saw the culmination of his B-grade acting career.
No crime scene = no crime
They are supporting out of work crisis actors
Becky, that’s exactly how I felt about Charlie Kirk up until 48 hours after he was “shot.” He seemed like such a kind, good-intentioned, happy family man. And the fact that we both felt that way is nothing to be ashamed of, but it IS something that we have to see was not based on reality, but on our entering into the collective fantasy that surrounded this character. The truth is, you and I viewed CK exactly how they WANTED half of us to view him. The other half of us they wanted to dispise and hate him, and there are plenty of those people too. And whether you loved or hated him you you were falling for “the character.” We have no idea who this person really is, because he was playing the scripted ROLE of CK. I began to see and realize this 48 hours later when his supposed widow gave her first speech. Now I see it so clearly (thanks to Substack writers like this one). I really encourage you to keep reading and researching. You can message me and I can send you links of the things I read and watched that revealed the truth to me. It’s important, not because of this incident so much, but because if we don’t see how much of our reality is manufactured, we will be unaware of how manipulated we are. Just as I was until very recently.
Why are you guys all writing novellas on a text platform?
Haha! I’m naturally verbose. You’re right, though, we need to say what we have to say in less words. Long comments are annoying.
Hey thanks for taking my comment with a good spirit
You tickled me with “novellas.”
Well you certainly aren’t the only one and by the way I agree with everything you said except I had never heard of him before
Kirk is as phony as a bacon bagel.
What if the palm pistol was used to distract and the user used a blank cartridge for the sound effect.
Hi Andrew,
it’s possible that Khaki Green Shirt Guy was holding a device that did have some sort of function in this charade. All we know is it wasn’t blasting a bullet into Kirk’s neck.
I agree with you.
Yeah, such a thing can’t be aimed from an armpit (is that where it was said to be located, approximately?) — certainly not accurately or reliably. There would be a very large chance of the projectile missing and hitting the audience. A pretty obviously stupid thing to try to accomplish.
Very much the same in principle as trying to pilot large passenger jets to hit two towers accurately and reliably when they’re reported to be going 500 mph at sea level which renders the planes ridiculously uncontrollable and they’ve only got one chance to get the job done.
Moreover (back to the Kirk shooting) the coroner allegedly, eventually “found” the bullet “just under the victim’s skin,” contained in the body, and made no mention of the thing being anything other than the rifle round that had been the assumption by everyone all along. Try shooting a .30-06 from the palm of one’s hand and see what the recoil would feel and look like.
I stumbled on this yesterday, the timing of his wrist twitch is bang on, but there is nothing else in it. Also, there is no way, like you quite rightly poi t out, that he could make that shot so nonchalantly. And he’s clearly security, given his reaction, so he knows whats going down. Though I did think that his facial expression changed to sudden shock, which made me think he was surprised. Just some fat to chew on. As with all these things, we will draw our own conclusions as to the finer detail, but given everything that you have already pointed out, irrespective of unreliable video evidence, I don’t think he was shot, and if he was (quite unlikely), it certainly wasn’t with a deer dropping head exploding hunting missile. And he is not fucking superman. That release from the TPUSA spokesman just put the cherry on the cake.
#CHARLIE KIRK
Charlie Kirk invited Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly and Dave Smith to the July 2025 Student Action Summit in Tampa, and held a public debate about Zionism. To the delight of the audience, they condemned Israel for its ongoing genocide against the Palestinian people, hijacking American foreign policy and Epstein’s paedophilic blackmail ring. His former Israeli sponsors were furious, and demanded that he drop Tucker and Marjorie Taylor Greene from the line up for AmFest. Charlie refused. Benjamin Netanyahu then offered to buy TPUSA for a rumoured $150 million, but Charlie refused this too, saying: “Bibi tried to buy me off, but I told him Turning Point isn’t for sale. He doesn’t get to control what I say about Israel.”
Multiple sources confirmed that Charlie then feared for his life, and on 13th August 2025, Twitter / X user Tommy Borum posted: “If Charlie turned heel on Israel, they would have someone shoot him at an open-air event and then have some idiot groyper with a genetically anomalous issue there to be the patsy / fall-guy. Part of why you never make the deal with the Devil in the first place.” Weeks later, this is exactly what happened. Before Charlie’s body had gone cold, TPUSA was taken over by radical Zionist, Ben Shapiro. And now Trump’s government is desperately trying to shut down the investigation.
Digger B,
would you mind pointing out just where, in the following videos of the the July 2025 Student Action Summit, Charlie Kirk “condemned Israel for its ongoing genocide against the Palestinian people, hijacking American foreign policy and Epstein’s paedophilic blackmail ring”?
https://www.youtube.com/live/ZuuU8B7m_I4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehhKJf7GWlw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gt2R5-d2NZ4
I couldn’t find it. What I did find is Kirk praising Trump at 3:42:20 on Day 1, claiming “He’s focused on a lot of other things which are going great and he needs to be focused on those other things. Jeffrey Epstein is not the most important thing on his agenda by any stretch of the imagination. I mean, he’s crushing it on the tariffs, foreign policy, just got nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. If not Trump, then who?”
https://www.youtube.com/live/ZuuU8B7m_I4?feature=shared&t=13334
So he’s actually playing down the Epstein situation, and claiming Trump is “crushing it” on foreign policy.
Hardly sounds to me like a guy whose pissed off about the Epstein cover-up and angry that Israel is dictating US foreign policy.
Then on Day 3, he says at 3:59:17:
“Some of my best memories ever have been going to Israel, traveling to Israel…”
https://www.youtube.com/live/gt2R5-d2NZ4?feature=shared&t=14357
Yep, really sounds like he’s having a rethink about his love for Israel. Not.
By the way, at 1:06:55 Chris Pavlovski (founder and CEO of Rumble) says “we had guys like uh Vice President JD Vance and Charlie Kirk uh invest in Rumble”, which should tell you all you need to know about Rumble.
https://www.youtube.com/live/ehhKJf7GWlw?feature=shared&t=4015
As for the absurd rumor of a $150 million buyout offer from the Nutty Yahoo, that’s all it is – a strategically disseminated rumor.
Where did it come from?
Oh, “a source close to Kirk”.
Which source? Would that be Andrew Kolvet, the genius who wants us to believe that Kirk was the miracle man of steel?
Or would it be one of the other numerous characters involved with this shonky ‘non-profit’?
Or is “a source close to Kirk” simply what was written in the script by whichever alphabet agency/s are overseeing this blatant farce?
I am new to your Substack, but like what I am seeing. However it appears to me that your response demonstrates two fundamental errors:-
(1) You seem to have misread my previous comment, which said that it was Charlie’s guests (principally Tucker Carlson and Dave White) who were the biggest critics of Israel’s foreign policy, not Charlie himself; and
(2) You seem to confuse / conflate criticism of Benjamin Netanyahu with hatred of Israel.
To his dying day, Charlie Kirk made no secret of his love for Israel and the Jewish people. However his TPUSA motto was “prove me wrong”, and many Gruypers took up the challenge, by telling him about events like the King David bombing and the sinking of the USS Liberty. This got him to thinking, and over time he started questioning more and more aspects of the Zionist narrative. He questioned Jeffrey Epstein’s links to Israel and Mossad. He questioned whether the October 7th attack had been an “inside job”. And he not only questioned the extent of Israel’s influence over American politics, but he even tried to stop Trump doing Netanyahu’s bidding in attacking Iran.
Much of Israel’s behaviour is so evil as to be indefensible. So what it does is shut down any attempt at debate, by calling its critics anti-Semites or supporters of Hamas. Starting around 59:30 in the following interview, Charlie Kirk and Megyn Kelly speak of their growing anger at having these allegations levelled at them:-
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=n2qn0mvSCig&pp=0gcJCRsBo7VqN5tD
In this interview, Charlie says things like: ‘The behaviour by a lot, both privately and publicly, are pushing people like you and me away.” Megyn responds by saying: “The more you try to tell me not to criticize Israel, the more likely I am to do it To focus on exactly what you are doing. What are you doing that you are so defensive? You don’t own me!” Charlie agreed, and went from asking rhetorical questions about Zionism, to moderating a 75 minute debate on the subject at the July 2025 TPUSA Student Action Summit at Tampa:-
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fsUU-FyVDwk&t=1000s&pp=2AHoB5ACAQ%3D%3D
During this debate, Dave Smith wiped the floor with his Zionist opponent, to raptorous applause from the young conservative audience. The blowback from this was so bad that Charlie started fearing for his life, however he refused to back down. Instead of showing contrition for what he had done, it looks like he was indeed doubling down on the issue. Not only did he invite Tucker Carlson back to speak at Amfest 2025, but he also invited staunch Israel critic, Marjorie Taylor Green. She was not only the first Republican representative to call Israel’s actions genocidal, but she has also spoken about JFK being killed over Israel’s secret nuclear weapons program. Over the summer she also introduced a bill to cut security payments to Israel.
All manner of pressure was put upon Charlie to uninvite Tucker and MTG. He was shouted at, screamed at, threatened by people all the way up to Benjamin Netanyahu himself. All of his Israeli sponsors stopped their financial support, and Netanyahu even tried to buy TPUSA. Charlie refused this offer saying: “Bibi tried to buy me off, but I told him Turning Point isn’t for sale. He doesn’t get to control what I say about Israel.”
And then at his next speaking engagement, Charlie was murdered, the Trump administration is going to absurd lengths to covered up the shooting, and his speaking engagements were taken over by a staunch Zionist…
Digger B,
I didn’t misunderstand anything, I interpreted your email exactly as it read. Next time you use “they” when referring to Kirk and others in the very same sentence, state clearly just who “they” are.
Now – do you have even an ounce of proof for ANY of your totally unfounded claims – including the bizarre assertion that he really was shot during this patently obvious B-grade farce?
You know, the one where he was supposedly shot by a .30-06, which would have literally turned his head and neck into bits of dangling, bloody flesh. Instead, we’re supposed to believe it left a quarter-sized hole in his neck and stopped underneath his skin because he was the miracle man of steel?
LOL
“He questioned whether the October 7th attack had been an “inside job”. ”
No he didn’t.
He made comments, shortly after Oct 7, quite lame compared to what others out here in the real world have stated, that something was amiss.
https://www.newsweek.com/charlie-kirk-israel-gaza-benjamin-netanyahu-2132583
This is what Kirk said:
“Maybe the Israeli government was double-crossed, maybe they had intelligence about this. We don’t know.”
“”It’s possible that the Netanyahu government was double-crossed by bad agents, okay? That’s dark, but it’s not as dark as what we’re talking about, okay. Another aspect is that Netanyahu might have traitors in his government, like legitimate traitors that infiltrated.”
He’s making excuses for them. NOWHERE does he ever state the obvious – it was an inside job involving a supposed ‘terrorist’ organization created and sponsored by the terrorist state of Israel.
NOWHERE has he ever told the truth – that the mass rape and babies-burned-in-mcirowaves stories were complete bullshit. To the contrary, the lying grub kept repeating them.
“These savage animals, in the name of Islam … Hamas are a bunch of savage animals.”
Could you point out where Kirk explained to his viewers that Hamas would not even exist if not for the savage animals of Israel’s leadership and the IDF?
“”I’ve got to be careful the way I say this, they’re going to try to ethnically cleanse Gaza. And I don’t use that term lightly, okay? They’re talking about basically removing 2.5 million people from there. And honestly, they have a mandate to go seek justice and revenge. They do. This idea that they need to have a truce or a peace treaty, that’s morally crap after you see women and children be burned alive and dragged to the streets.”
So the disgusting piece of excrement was saying outright that Israel has the right to go and ethnically cleanse Gaza!
How the FUQ does this constitute the kind of anti-Israeli sentiment that would make him a target of Mossad?
Simple: It doesn’t. He was acting as a very enthusiastic propagandist for them.
This is what it really looks like when you point out Oct 7 was an inside job:
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/the-art-of-bullsht-how-sneaky-debate
During the time since, he aggressively argued in favor of Israel and its right to murder innocent Palestinians. Here he is, as recently as May, getting visibly angry at a Cambridge student who had the temerity to suggest that what the IDF was doing in Gaza was wholly unacceptable:
https://youtu.be/M59tcsXPEtw
Questioning October 7 my ass! As with every other Zionist supporter of pedicide, October 7 was Kirk’s go-to bromide for justifying the butchery of the IDF.
Here is the shameless liar and propagandist in July, audaciously claiming he hates being lied to and propagandized, insisting that the IDF was not starving Gazans:
https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1949908699411288130
Turning on Israel and the Nutty Yahoo my ass!
“Charlie agreed, and went from asking rhetorical questions about Zionism, to moderating a 75 minute debate on the subject at the July 2025 TPUSA Student Action Summit at Tampa:-”
I’ve already provided you with the links to the full replays of each day of that 3-day summit, and asked you to point out where Kirk said anything even remotely anti-Israel. He didn’t, and you know it – which is why you can’t point to them.
“but I told him Turning Point isn’t for sale”
That’s cute. As if TPUSA wasn’t already owned and operated by Zionists! LOL
“All manner of pressure was put upon Charlie to uninvite Tucker and MTG. He was shouted at, screamed at, threatened by people all the way up to Benjamin Netanyahu himself. All of his Israeli sponsors stopped their financial support, and Netanyahu even tried to buy TPUSA. Charlie refused this offer saying: “Bibi tried to buy me off, but I told him Turning Point isn’t for sale. He doesn’t get to control what I say about Israel.”
Utter bullshit.
I’ll ask again: Where is the proof for any of this?
For your edification, proof is not something Kirk claimed, because he was a liar and a fraud, a character playing a role.
Proof is not something he allegedly said to Candace Owens or the Permanent Frowner in “private”, because something allegedly said in private cannot be verified. I wouldn’t trust either of those jokers as far as I could throw them.
“And then at his next speaking engagement, Charlie was murdered”
Wow. You really believe this bullshit. Good for you. Would you like to buy some miracle sewerage, guaranteed to make you live to 100? Some prime waterfront property (swampland)? A piece of the Brooklyn Bridge, perhaps?
“and his speaking engagements were taken over by a staunch Zionist…”
A staunch Zionist? Is that like a guy who constantly professes his love for Israel, practices a Jewish shabbat, and constantly justifies pedicide using Oct 7 as the excuse?
A guy like Charlie Kirk?
Kirk made some limp-dicked comments about Israel that could later be used to give the fake appearance of dissent, and false rumors about him being the subject of a buyout from the Nutty Yahoo have been perpetuated, so that a distracting narrative could be created about him being a target of Israel.
Like the palm protector gun theory, the Israel-did-it theory still perpetuates the claim that Kirk was fatally shot on September 10, which he clearly wasn’t.
And people like you either buy into it, or come to platforms like this to deliberately reinforce the narrative that poor old Charlie, who allegedly drank so much milk he had bones of steel, was fatally shot in an ‘assassination’.
I don’t think people realize the kinetic energy transferred by a 30-06 rifle round
Thank you for the offer to sell me the Brooklyn Bridge. Much as it is a fine looking structure which I have enjoyed walking over, it’s just too big for the river on my property. Besides which, the shipping costs to the Scottish Highlands would be exorbitant!
.
I completely agree, and have written often, that I believe that Israel:-
Created, funded and allowed Hamas to take over Gaza;
Used Hamas to carry out the October 7th attacks, to create an excuse to ethnically cleanse Gaza;
Applied the Hannibal Directive, to increase the deaths which could be blamed on Hamas; and
Lied about mass rape and babies burned in microwaves to justify its genocidal actions.
.
Charlie Kirk was a Judeo-Christian extremist, who said a number of offensive things. He received a lot of money from Zionist sources, and pushed their narrative about October 7th. This said, there is a substantial body of evidence that while Charlie Kirk loved Israel, he loved America more. He started to realise that Benjamin Netanyahu was forcing Trump to do things which were harmful to the United States, and explored this more and more. He even travelled to the White House to persuade Trump not to attack Iran. To look at some of the evidence that Kirk was undergoing something of a change of heart when the shooting incident took place:-
.
● On 9th September 2025, Charlie Kirk said to Ben Shapiro: “A friend said to me, interestingly: ‘Charlie, okay, we’ve pushed back against the media on COVID, on lockdowns, on Ukraine, on the border. Maybe we should also ask the question: is the media totally presenting the truth when it comes to Israel?’ Just a question! Maybe we shouldn’t be believing everything the media says. I KNOW THAT I HAVE BEEN CONDITIONED TO ASKING MORE CRITICAL QUESTIONS OVER THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS” (emphasis added);
https://youtu.be/Gt4rRPkyjVY?si=xAO5lFnS_LfqUYin&t=598
.
● Israel does not like anyone questioning its actions, and will do everything in its power to stop this. This ranges from the classic antisemitism scam, to paying Social Media Influencers to push propaganda, to shooting journalists by the hundred. At a time when support for Israel was at an all time low among Generation Z Americans. it would not want someone as influential as Kirk planting seeds of doubt in the minds of millions of young conservatives;
.
● Not only did Kirk question various aspects of the Zionist narrative, but at July’s TPUSA Student Action Summit in Tampa, he even moderated a 75 minute televised debate on the subject;
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fsUU-FyVDwk
.
● In introducing Zio-Sceptic Dave Smith, Kirk said that they had “agreed about so much back stage”. This would have to give Israel cause for concen about the path he was on;
.
● Dave Smith mopped the floor with his Zionist rival, who could only rely on cheap tricks, like gaslighting and ad hominem insults. It was obvious from the huge level of applause that the young conservative crowd favoured Smith;
.
● After the debate, Kirk said: “it’s best to have this debate out in the open than to silence people.” This is something his Zionist backers would hate to happen;
.
● Tucker Carlson was particularly brutal at Tampa, taunting Zionist billionaires like Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Ackman for “getting away with scams” despite having “no actual skills.” He said that they were only wealthy because they are hyper-aggressive and well connected;
https://x.com/Acyn/status/1943832729529069767/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1943832729529069767¤tTweetUser=Acyn
.
● Charlie Kirk then invited Tucker Carlson to speak at Amfest 2025, along with the more extreme Zio-critic, Marjorie Taylor Green;
.
● “Tucker Carlson [revealed] that Charlie Kirk told him many times in private that he did not like Benjamin Netanyahu. Kirk saw Netanyahu as a destructive force and was horrified by the children being killed in Gaza under his leadership. Kirk believed Netanyahu was draining the lifeblood of the United States to serve his own ambitions and his country… Kirk’s Israeli donors “tormented him until the day he died””;
https://x.com/ShadowofEzra/status/1968112360138109124?s=19
.
● A longtime friend of Charlie Kirk told The Grayzone that Kirk had come to loathe the Israeli leader, regarding him as a “bully”. “Kirk was disgusted by what he witnessed inside the Trump administration, where Netanyahu sought to personally dictate the president’s personnel decisions, and weaponized Israeli assets like billionaire donor Miriam Adelson to keep the White House firmly under its thumb… “He was afraid of them”, the source emphasized”;
https://thegrayzone.com/2025/09/12/charlie-kirk-netanyahu-israel-assassination/
.
● On 6th August 2025, Charlie Kirk and Megyn Kelly both spoke about the blowback they were receiving from their Israeli contacts;
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1WuOtvdV5W0
.
● Shortly after the TPUSA Student Action Summit, pro-Israel lobbyists invited Charlie Kirk and others to dinner at the Hamptons. Witnesses say that this was something of an intervention, with Kirk being presented with a detailed list of his supposed transgressions against Israel, Bill Ackman and Nastasha Hausdorff (of UK Lawyers for Israel) are alleged to have screamed at Kirk. Ackman allegedly told Kirk to rescind his invitation for Tucker Carlson to speak at the coming America Fest (Amfest) 2025. Kirk felt he was being blackmailed. The “hyper-aggressive” Ackman has acknowledged that the dinner took place, but claims he never said a harsh word about the man who had roasted him in front of the TPUSA movement, and who Charlie had invited back for another go;
https://thegrayzone.substack.com/p/billionaire-bill-ackman-convened?utm_source=post-banner&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=posts-open-in-app&triedRedirect=true
.
● On 13th August 2025, Kirk’s friend, Infowars host Harrison H. Smith tweeted : “I’m not gonna name names, but I was told by someone close to Charlie Kirk that Charlie thinks Israel will kill him if he turns against them”;
https://twitter.com/HarrisonHSmith/status/1955705962964111425
.
● In a recent podcast (No. 245), Candace Owens said: “About 48 hours before Charlie Kirk died, Charlie informed people at Turning Point, as well as Jewish donors and a rabbi, that he had no choice but to abandon the pro-Israel cause outright… Charlie was done. He said it explicitly, that he refused to be bullied anymore by the Jewish donors”; and
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/aVf-TFgztJ8
.
.
I see the speed and freqency of Benjamin Netanyahu’s denials as evidence that he had intended to kill Charlie Kirk. If Kirk was indeed killed, then it seems to me that the shooter was the security guard standing to his right, hiding what looked like a pistol under his armpit. As he raised his arm, an apparent wound appeared on Kirk’s neck as he was knocked to that side.
.
It has been said that Kirk told a number of top officials about his assassination fears, including Donald Trump and Bobby Kennedy. If Trump had the slightest decency, he would have done something to protect his friend. If he was unwilling or unable to stand up to Netanyahu, then at the very least he might have staged Kirk’s death, in the same way there are reasons to believe the attack on Iran might have been staged. This would not stop him using the assassination for his own cynical ends. This does of course rely on Trump having the slightest decency, so I would require good evidence…
It took you a week to come up with this?
“On 9th September 2025, Charlie Kirk said to Ben Shapiro…”
Big deal. That’s not an anti-Israel comment. It’s also most unlikely that Mossad organized this farce in less than 24 hours (Kirk was ‘shot’ the next day, remember).
” Israel does not like anyone questioning its actions, and will do everything in its power to stop this. This ranges from the classic antisemitism scam, to paying Social Media Influencers to push propaganda, to shooting journalists by the hundred. At a time when support for Israel was at an all time low among Generation Z Americans. it would not want someone as influential as Kirk planting seeds of doubt in the minds of millions of young conservatives”
Not proof of assassination. A lot of people don’t like being questioned, but they don’t kill those who do so.
“Not only did Kirk question various aspects of the Zionist narrative, but at July’s TPUSA Student Action Summit in Tampa, he even moderated a 75 minute televised debate on the subject”
Already addressed this twice in my replies to you, and the fact that at NO POINT during the 3 day summit did he say anything remotely anti-Israel.
” In introducing Zio-Sceptic Dave Smith, Kirk said that they had “agreed about so much back stage”. This would have to give Israel cause for concen about the path he was on”
Wow, really getting desperate now. They could have agreed on Ford vs Chevrolet, tacos vs tortillas, brunettes vs blondes, the list goes on. Again, as a motive for assassination this is about as weak as it gets.
“Dave Smith mopped the floor with his Zionist rival, who could only rely on cheap tricks, like gaslighting and ad hominem insults. It was obvious from the huge level of applause that the young conservative crowd favoured Smith”
So why didn’t Mossad kill Smith?
“After the debate, Kirk said: “it’s best to have this debate out in the open than to silence people.” This is something his Zionist backers would hate to happen;”
Again, a pretty weak motive for assassination.
“Tucker Carlson was particularly brutal at Tampa, taunting Zionist billionaires like Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Ackman …”
So why haven’t Mossad killed Tucker Carlson? It’s not like he’s a recluse who never goes out in public!
“Charlie Kirk then invited Tucker Carlson to speak at Amfest 2025, along with the more extreme Zio-critic, Marjorie Taylor Green:
Refer to comment above; ditto for MTG.
“”Tucker Carlson [revealed] that Charlie Kirk told him many times in private …”
In “private”, huh?
Next.
“A longtime friend of Charlie Kirk told The Grayzone…”
Ah, more he said/she said ‘evidence’.
Ugh.
“On 6th August 2025, Charlie Kirk and Megyn Kelly both spoke about the blowback they were receiving from their Israeli contacts…”
Blowback from their Israeli contacts?
Oooh, sounds scary. I mean, who wants to be blown by an Israeli?
Oh, and its Megan Kelly who talks about “blowback”. Captain Kirk says at 1:02:28, “Megan. I think I have a bulletproof resume showing my defense of Israel both on campus, on social media to to great, you know, let’s just say mockery and scorn at times where I because I believe it, right? I I believe in the scriptural land rights given to Israel. I believe in fulfillment of prophecy. And again, I’m not a theologian, but I’m a Christian. My life was changed in Israel. The spiritual energy is so amazing there. I I want them to win.”
So your thesis is that Israel murdered a guy who was constantly shilling for Israel?
Sure thing, you stick with that thesis if it makes you feel good. Just know it’s absurd nonsense.
“Shortly after the TPUSA Student Action Summit, pro-Israel lobbyists invited Charlie Kirk and others to dinner at the Hamptons. Witnesses say…”
Ah, yes THEY say. More third party hearsay.
Zzzz…zzz….zzz….
Huh… what ….oh, you’re still going.
“On 13th August 2025, Kirk’s friend, Infowars host Harrison H. Smith…”
You really love that he said/she said line of evidence, don’t you?
It’s problematic at the best of times, but when it involves someone tied to Alex Jones, it’s next to worthless.
” In a recent podcast (No. 245), Candace Owens said…”
Ah, more hearsay, this time from Candace Owens, whose other claims to fame include deeming Andrew Tate a top bloke.
This is getting wild lol
“I see the speed and freqency of Benjamin Netanyahu’s denials as evidence that he had intended to kill Charlie Kirk.”
So if you accuse ME of killing someone, and I immediately tell you you’re a flipping nutter, that’s proof I am in fact guilty?
LOL
“It has been said that…”
You just can’t help yourself.
Your comment spans almost 1,200 words, yet you could not produce a single anti-Israel comment by the intensely pro-Israel Kirk.
Just a bunch of unverifiable third party hearsay from dubious sources that the Israelis were throwing tanties because the intensely pro-Israel Kirk was occasionally talking to people who weren’t intensely pro-Israel.
All this alleged hearsay and Kirk’s hosting of the occasional anti-Zionist are very likely part of the script. Like the COVID “lab leak” theory, it’s probably a GloboPedo-approved narrative disguised as a counter-theory, when in reality it is intended to reinforce the tale that an assassination really did take place on September 10, instead of a B-grade acting production.
The Brooklyn Bridge offer still stands.
Apologies for the previous delay, however I do have a life outside social media! I see no point in wasting too much more time on this, so I shall restrict myself to a couple of brief comments before I unsubscribe:-
.
● In the legal profession, the people you dismiss as “third parties” are called “witnesses”. If you are looking for Mossad to sign a full, written confession, you will be waiting a very long time; and
.
● Israel is rapidly losing grassroots support around the world. It can survive this, as long as it keeps control of the United States. Support amongst Republican boomers is holding strong, but it is losing generation Z. It invested hundreds of millions of dollars in TPUSA, to keep young conservatives on its side. It would not have been happy seeing Charlie Kirk using the platform it paid for to host a succession of critics. The evidence suggests that Israel tried to get things back on track using blackmail and bribery, however this angered Kirk and pushed him further away. This left Israel with two main choices. It could murder Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Taylor Green, Dave Smith, Candace Owens, Megyn Kelly and every other critic who might speak at TPUSA events, or it could stop TPUSA hosting critics by murdering Charlie Kirk. It seems absurdly obvious to me which route Israel would take, but you are welcome to your opinion.
Hi Digger B,
” In the legal profession…”
Ah yes, that collection of paid liars that rates highly on the psychopathy scale.
At any rate, CCTV evidence and incriminating statements straight from the horse’s mouth will always take precedence over “witnesses” whose testimony is at odds with the actual facts and behavior of the accused.
“Israel is rapidly losing grassroots support around the world. It can survive this, as long as it keeps control of the United States.”
It is in no imminent danger of losing control of the US, and if it ever does, it won’t be because of Charlie Kirk. Israel was losing US public support while Kirk was vigorously defending its disgraceful behavior.
People are disgusted with Israel because it is an insanely racist, land-thieving terrorist state that murders innocent people – something you NEVER did or would hear Charlie Kirk acknowledging.
“or it could stop TPUSA hosting critics by murdering Charlie Kirk.”
Again, your thesis is that it could increase public support by murdering one of its most vocal ‘influencer’ defenders.
It seems absurdly obvious to me which route Israel would take, but you are welcome to your opinion.
It is also absurdly obvious that what took place on September 10 was a complete B-grade hoax. Kirk was not shot, a 30.06 would have blown his head clean off, not put a quarter-sized hole in his neck spurting clearly CGI-enhanced blood. A 30.06 would not have made his t-shirt do a shimmy shake – but a blood squib contraption would have.
No-one has ever presented footage of the alleged shooter actually holding a gun. There is no sign of a gun in any of the photos or footage, but we are expected to believe it’s there any old how, despite the evidence of our own eyes.
If the shooting was real, the area would have been immediately taped off as a crime scene, not left open for people to trample over and remove equipment and evidence.
Aerial support would have been immediately dispatched because a live shooter was still at large.
If he was DOA, a hospital doctor would have no cause to “work” on him. Instead, he would have been taken straight to the morgue and a coroner’s report would have commenced.
None of this happened because there was no assassination that day, just a patently obvious psy-op.
Mr. No Profile Pic there is a disinformation agent. I’ll bet five pints of blood he’s paid to say what he does.
And he doesn’t give a fig about beating you in debate; to a shill, every interaction is just another opportunity to drop their propaganda payload in a way that looks natural, that looks like that’s not what he’s doing.
Whenever the global oligarchy runs a psyop like the fake Kirk shooting, they know people like you and me are going to immediately spot the flaws and unravel it, so they send fleets of these walking, talking lumps of fecal matter to try to shout down the truth, with their short list of canned tactics.
I’ve been outing disinformation agents online for nine consecutive years now. I may not have any degrees from a [fraudulent, useless, hijacked, lapdog] institution, but I think I’m as much of an “expert” on the subject as anyone alive.
https://seventhearchivist.substack.com/p/the-shill-sniper-toolkit
What a waste of time.
Yeah your comments are just too long and rambling and Kirk stole the prove me wrong from Steven Crowder another dork
It’s impossible to please everyone. If I make a brief comment, am told that it is unsubstantiated. When I provide evidence to back things up, people complain I have said too much…
Jesus Christ look up the word succinct
Probably Mossad just like 9/11
https://substack.com/@911revision/note/c-159752335?r=38a8y&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
Sure does look like his security detail should be under scrutiny
This video pretty damn
Thoroughly debunked in the article you are commenting on, and clearly didn’t read.
Or maybe you did read it, but have come here for the purpose of obfuscation?
Oh, and wasn’t Stew Peters the genius who along with Brian Ardis claimed “COVID” was caused by snake venom in the water supply?!
Next…
Buddy, lay off the ayahuasca.
Anthony, you sure appear to be controlled ops, very disappointed.
Yes, I’m very disappointed that I get accused of being controlled op yet never get my psy-op participant payments. I need to contact whoever manages Steve Kirsch and Robert Malone.
You’d be in such illustrious company then!
it appears people read the title, then comment. lol
Welcome to the internet
Sucker
One of the propaganda streams for the fake JFK assassination was “killed by secret service agents”. They recycle everything although as far as I’m aware palm protector gun is brand new! – bet they had a laugh over that one. I just asked ChatGPT if it identified the JFK secret service agents theory and it came back with the various rationales for that theory:
1. Lapses in Protection Were Deliberate
Claim: Some theorists argue that the agents deliberately failed to protect JFK—e.g., leaving him exposed in the motorcade, slow reaction after the first shot.
Evidence cited:
— The car didn’t speed away immediately after shots were fired.
— Some agents were reportedly out of position.
2. Confusion Among Agents
Claim: The positioning of Secret Service agents in the limousine or on the follow-up vehicles could suggest coordination with the shooter.
Evidence cited:
— Some argue that agents’ movement patterns “opened up lines of fire.”
— Reports of agents seemingly distracted or looking in the wrong direction.
3. Alleged Motives
Claim: Certain theorists suggest that JFK clashed with Secret Service officials over policy, security decisions, or internal CIA connections, giving agents a motive.
Evidence cited:
— JFK’s dissatisfaction with the Secret Service after prior threats.
— Alleged ties between some agents and intelligence communities.
4. Eyewitness Testimonies
Claim: Some bystanders and researchers have interpreted agent behavior as suspicious, such as looking away or opening doors.
> Certain theorists suggest that JFK clashed with Secret Service officials over policy, security decisions, or internal CIA connections, giving agents a motive.
—
I BELIEVE THAT OUR AGENCIES CAN BE MANIPULATED INTO ASSISTING AN EVENT WITHOUT BEING ITS AUTHOR.
In the case of the JFK assassination, I don’t think that complicity on the part of the Secret Service required an agency motive or that the Secret Service instigated the assassination.
No individual American entity acting on its own has the power to ensure and coordinate the participation of all the parts and pieces required to pull off such a massive and treasonous event. (Not to mention the post-event investigations and conspiracy movies made, both of which hid the true author of the crime.)
The S.S. didn’t author the assassination. Instead, they — and all other American agencies and individuals who were involved in the event — were manipulated and directed from higher up, by an invisible power that makes sure it’s never mentioned or breathed a word of.
How can our own American politicians and institutions be used against us?
YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND THAT OUR ENTIRE GOVERNMENT AND SOCIETY IS RUN BY A FOREIGN NATION, whose strings and levers and switches form an effectively invisible ROOT SYSTEM of influence and control throughout every useful American institution — including financial, political, academic, media, defense, security, and police.
And in most cases, it’s not the 90% of honest employees of such institutions who know this is going on. All you need is to control key figures in key positions, those who pass orders on to those below them, etc., etc.
Pull an oak tree straight out of the ground, and you’ll see roots that tentacle into every small cubic inch of ground below and around it, roots that begin few and thick at the base of the tree and gradually branch out into smaller and smaller tentacles that burrow into and access every cubic centimeter of ground far below and around. It reaches everywhere.
Like a “finger of God,” this invisible hierarchy can send down an order — like a signal down a nerve pathway — and make any agency, at any level, do any thing. Via bribes, threats, blackmail, promises, pressures, or by having long ago installed one’s own people in such positions who act from loyalty and don’t need blatant gifts or threats in order to perform a function.
For example, through the root system it has established inside America, the foreign nation can — invisibly, remember — “cause” a supervisor to pull an S.S. agent off a presidential limousine to open up a shot, it can “cause” the limo driver to take a sharp turn that breaks strict S.S. security policy, and it “cause” that driver to slow down after a shot rings out to make sure that the next shots can hit the target. It can cause our politicians to rig an investigative committee that dodges the truth. It can task our black ops guys to hire assassins to kill most of the witnesses before they can show up for testimony. It can tell the newly-sworn-in “president” to resume the war in Vietnam and to cease hassling the foreign nation as JFK had been doing. (Etc., etc., etc.)
Bart Classen(MD) provides a very useful “first hand” recounting of the very process you perceive and detail: COVID-19 and Illegal US Bioweapons Activity, an Insider’s Revelations – Trends Int Med. 2022; 2(2): 1-11.
ABSTRACT
Millions if not billions of people now believe that the world is under a bioweapons attack.
The Author worked as a fellow at NIAID/NIH from 1988 to 1991, starting soon after Fauci became head of NIAID. The author witnessed first hand infiltration of NIAID/NIH by Israel’s Mossad. While working at NIAID/NIH one or more coworkers expressed a need to “preempt the next Jewish Holocaust”. For thirty years since leaving NIH the Author has paid close attention to Mossad’s involvement in illegal US bioweapon activity and attempts to disclose his observations. The Author hopes to educate the public on the current bioweapon attack with COVID-19 and vaccines. The Author believes that Mossad intends to kill billions of people. Already 70% of the world’s population have received a COVID-19 vaccine which in all appearance has the ability to cause deadly non curable prion disease. The Author hopes the information provided will help those interested in ending this covert war.”
In previous timelines, Classen would be regards as one of those “patriots” compelled to speak up – like survivors of the USS Liberty debacle – about the subversion of his own country’s sovereignty he was witness to. These days, such as he are regarded as “rogue recidivists” to be ‘cracked down upon’ summarily… even in Trimpfs “America First?”
Most definitely in Trimpf’s America Faust!” – “‘Largest NEH Grant in History’ Awarded to Jewish Org to Counter ‘Pathology of Antisemitism,’ Teach Talmud” https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=65039
the LastManStanding: Thank you for this example. It makes perfect sense. And this is just one, tiny, discrete instance of the process. I am quite certain, as I mentioned, that this goes on widely and deeply throughout our society. One wonders how it can be stopped before it’s all too late. In all likelihood — absent some kind of supernatural intervention — it cannot be stopped.
NOAHIDE AMERIKA came fully into being January 20, 2025. There is no stopping the execution of the rest of the script now. By inveigling citizen/serfs to wittingly sign off one(vote) for the very Beast employed to install this abortion, the kabbalist-talmudist kabal arranged the necessary conditions(the awareness & acceptance of the victim)for the final act to proceed.
If one thinks “abattoir” & “cattle prods” are words unfitting to describe that final scene…. then they are still drinking the foolaid.
Speaking of the Beast and January 20th, I made the following short comment several days ago. Link follows, with copy-paste below:
https://risingdawn360.substack.com/p/the-seventh-head-of-the-beast-with/comment/157495778?utm_source=activity_item#comment-157781488?utm_source=activity_item
Two strange observations about our “christian,” god-loving leader:
1. Upon his swearing in as our leader, he’s probably the first and only president in history who deliberately chose to *not* put his hand on the bible. (Did anyone else see the video I saw, and do you agree that that’s what it shows?)
2. If I remember correctly, Revelations refers to The Beast receiving and surviving a head wound. (Is a faked ear wound close enough for this to count symbolically?)
I just found this interesting.
Wow! Finally I found someone with the exact same theory I have! Chaz is alive and well. They only reveal what they want us to see.
So, it seems CK up to this fake was criticizing Israel ON PURPOSE, so the clips can naturally go viral, further stoking division. He was “allowed” to say some truths in order to create an ostensible, believable reason for Israel to take him out.
All roads lead to more intentionally created chaos, the ultimate set up for more draconian controls, on a global scale.
Ultimate goal: techno-feudalism.
Fake and they hoax all the way.
I agree, not a plausible option. I also find is bewildering that there is not any more footage from all the people there who must of been recording him speaking. Where is this footage?.
Absolutely this was a hoax (no One died) psyop! Thank You for all the info You provide to consider…that clearly shows it was bunk. A ritual to dupe the masses. An excuse to shut down freedom of speech. A distraction from the Palantirization of Our planet.
https://substack.com/@911revision/note/c-159752335?r=38a8y&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
Watch this video the security details quite suspicious
Thoroughly debunked in the article you are commenting on, and clearly didn’t read.
Or maybe you did read it, but have come here for the purpose of obfuscation?
Oh, and wasn’t Stew Peters the genius who along with Brian Ardis claimed “COVID” was caused by snake venom in the water supply?!
Next…
It’s a video it’s not an article
The funny thing is about that Brian artist, snake venom shit
Have you ever been bitten by a snake like say for instance, a copperhead or water moccasin not deadly, but does have long-term effects on your liver and kidney other organs
That’s exactly what my Covid experience was lasted seven hours. I guess I don’t know what the fuck it was. The headache lingered for two weeks.
Three years later, I’m still dealing with it
Yes, I believe Stu peters is a used car salesman
So debunk the video I don’t know it’s just information and I am not trying to obfuscate anything.
Have you ever read Miles Mathis? …. Everything the hoax.
And he makes a damn good argument you on the other hand you’re not Miles Mathis
Never said it was an article, never said I was Miles Mathis.
R U OK, Raphael?
I repeat, Stewey’s video claims are debunked in the very article you are commenting on. Do you often comment on articles you haven’t read?
As for suffering long flu symptoms, which were around long before ‘Covid’, this does not even begin to show you were poisoned with ‘snake venom’…
I didn’t say you were Miles Mathis
You don’t have a seven hour flu with lasting kidney and liver damage
Stop it Raphael, no-one likes a smart-ass.
“I didn’t say you were Miles Mathis”
No, you wrote to me: “you’re not Miles Mathis”.
No shit, Sherlock. When did I ever claim to be him?
“You don’t have a seven hour flu with lasting kidney and liver damage”
I’ll repeat: This means absolutely NOTHING in terms of supporting the absurd claim that snake venom was poured into the water supply in order to produce ‘COVID’.
While everyone is coming up with various theories on what really happened, that isn’t really what we should be doing. Anthony has shown that what everyone should be doing is focusing on the official narrative, their “evidence” or lack thereof. Let’s poke holes in that. What that video does make clear is not what is seen, rather what is heard. That is not the report from a high powered rifle. It’s jut a “pop” from a possible small caliber gun.
Absolutely hilarious. And when they initially “caught” the guy who they said shot him, I thought, what the fuck, they’ve got Larry David? Of Curb Your Enthusiasm? It’s all theatre, folks. The matrix has us all trapped in it.
What people are seeing from the operative in front of Charlie, that coincidentally raises his hand and pointed at him the moment he appears to be shot, is the remote control for the blood squib
If that dude had shot him, you would see a muzzle flash, smoke and the bullet coming out
There was none of that
It’s a propaganda construct to be used as a vehicle
https://www.mind-war.com/p/der-sturm-bricht-los-stephen-millers
Anthony: At first read my first thought about the idea that Charlie Kirk is still alive was that it was tin-foil-hat stuff, but on further reflection, I recalled the case of the Challenger astronauts who appear to be still alive. Within the realm of possibility. As for the palm gun, that is as ridiculous as the official story. Whatever the truth is, which we’ll never know, it was a very sophisticated OP.
It was about as amateurish a CIA hoax as I’ve ever seen. They definitely took the low quote on the GAN-produced AI video of his “death”. It’s about as bad as the fake Kate Middleton cancer video. BRF has billions and this is the best they can do? Get outta here.
The term tin foil hat was created by the Deep state to discredit anyone who doubts them and the lies they present
Yep.
You and “Raphael” are either the same person, or part of the same bot army.
Please don’t waste everyone’s time by posting a theory and video that have already been thoroughly dissected and debunked in the article you are commenting on.
And you might want to pick a more credible source than Stew Peters, the genius who along with Brian Ardis claimed “COVID” was caused by snake venom in the water supply LOL
Troll status confirmed.
Bye bye “Alan”.
Charlie Kirk’s death was fake, and so was his life. There is no “Charlie Kirk”. There is an unknown CIA cutout actor playing the role of Kirk. Now that person has been reassigned.
Gecko1: Agreed on the video. What I meant was that the whole caper was sophisticated.
Charlie Kirk died of a drug overdose. We all saw it.
Gecko1: You’re certainly correct about the video. What I meant was that there were so many moving parts. The fake autopsy for one. If that apparent wound was an entrance wound, it would have completely blown out the back of his neck, as the back of JFK’s head was from a shot clearly from the front. I tried to post this as a response to your comment, but there are so many ridiculous hoops to jump through that I gave up in frustration. We can be sure that the government lies to us every time it opens its mouth, and that it doesn’t matter who we vote for for president, we always get John McCain.
I think the real question we should be asking is.. ‘How many videos/versions of the Utah meeting were made, and which was real? (If any).
Ridonkulous “theory”
Lol.
Perhaps he squeezed a remote trigger to set off the squib…. This big lie doth need to die so let’s not let this one go ok humanity?
Hi IP Freely,
you’re at least the third reader to mention this possibility and it certainly is feasible, so I’ve added mention of this into the article.
Kind regards
Chris Martinson of “Peak Prosperity” (YouTube) published his analysis of the Kirk murder with a credible ballistic impact study of what killed Kirk. His evidence points to a high velocity rifle round fired by another sniper from different building. He looked at the exploding mic, palm pistol and dismissed them because of the impact cavitation that may be observed in the video. It’s compelling and I changed my mind after I viewed it.
Kirk was not shot by anything. Real shootings don’t involve bouncy blood squib contraptions under one’s shirt, nor do you continue to hold a microphone after the nerves in your neck have been popped by a high-speed projectile.
Interesting reply but when you look at the anatomy of the neck, the jugular vein (low pressure return to heart) is outboard of the carotid artery( high pressure out bound from heart) what we saw was possible if the round transected the spinal cord and clipped the jugular simultaneously. You should take a look at Martinsons vid. It changed my mind.
The first video I saw after this happened was his security team rushing him covered on a stretcher into a private vehicle while aggressively pushing back people with cameras. That they didn’t use an EMS vehicle that was undoubtedly on the scene with life-saving measures on board to transport him to the hospital was all I needed to see
And with a neck wound, wouldn’t first aid try to stabilize the head and neck before the ‘victim’ was moved?
James: Correct. However, I find the term hilarious, and don’t shy away from using it in an act of sarcasm.
Theatre kayfabe to the max! Wrong props maybe?
Palm pistol guy has a name and people must know him. Where the mutherfuck is the FBI and why aren’t they questioning everybody near the murder scene?
Because there was no murder and no event that day. All the footage is AI generated digital video fakery.
And all those people there were holographic projections too. You’re right.
Do you know what the word “digital” means?
So that whole event never happened and no one was in attendance? That would be news to the people who were there.
This makes no sense. So Charlie an active guy is now in hiding and his wife Erica is running the show while Charlie is in disguise and quiet never to be seen again. Coming home in his disguise not to be noticed or staying home? I dont know about Turning Point but it was apparently reaching young people. I believe he was shot and dead and the evils out there planned this for their wicked narrative. That is more likely the truth. Its a stretch to say it was all a
set up.
Gecko1: Larry Johnson (an experienced rifleman) at Sonar 21 has produced a convincing case that what we saw on the video was an entrance wound caused by a frangible bullet (which are designed to break up on impact), and thus there was no exit wound. Also that what we saw was not an arterial bleed, but venous, because the impact caused his heart to stop functioning instantly. Also, the puffing up of his t-shirt both at the front and the back is just like the cavitation seen in a game animal when shot. Also, apparently one of the insiders with knowledge of what was found (they must have taken X-rays) in Charlie’s neck said that the bullet, or part of it hit one vertebra, turned, and lodged in another. This had to be an inside job. And the lamest official story I’ve ever heard.
The body in the casket was fake.
Obviously he’s gonna have a more advanced model being a government agent. Also, this same guy jumps over there and is looking down at Charlie Kirk smiling. He didn’t go to help but to confirm the kill. Same reason Charlie’s security guard behind him hits the button on his camera glasses. Also Frank Turek claims he was right there with Charlie trying to stop the bleeding. But you can see he ducks down and crawls away and then just runs away. He is not among the men that are right there over Charlie as he dies.
Why would a government agent shoot a CIA asset like Kirk?
Well the really good videos exposing the fake AF Kirk shooting are coming out now. Here’s the best yet:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYg6hC4gYlM
And more will come out, just like they did with the fake AF Trump shooting.
https://old.bitchute.com/video/XyQfYhZO9mLT/
Dear Jesus, he wasn’t shot with any gun look at the footage frame by frame
It’s a remote activated blood squib
It’s Hollywood MediaMagic
Nothing in this narrative matches the natural principles of a 30 06 shooting a man in the neck or any other gun
And most people don’t know that because they see 100 people get shot on TV by the time they’re 10 years old and they all look the same so they think that’s what it looks like
There’s no actual factual evidence to demonstrate that he is even dead
Aside from the believe everybody got watching TV
His martyrdom is being used as a vehicle, a construct in the same capacity that Horst Wessel was used back in the day
https://www.mind-war.com/p/der-sturm-bricht-los-stephen-millers