Note to those obnoxious characters who write to accuse me of plagiarism: This post contains clear acknowledgement to Craig Murray, and has done so since the very moment it was first posted.
Laurens van der Post
When selecting a godfather for Prince William, heir to the British throne, Prince Charles chose his close friend and adviser Laurens van der Post. A pedophile.
At age 46, van der Post molested a 14-year-old girl during a sea voyage from South Africa to London. The girl had been entrusted to van der Post’s care by her parents. He then installed her in a flat in London as his mistress, but abandoned her when she became pregnant at age 15 (though he sent a monthly payment). The illegitimate child born from this hebephilic predation was also disowned by van der Post. The victim later stated that van der Post was “sick” and “he knew how to pick his victims”.
In addition to being a sexual deviant, van der Post was a self-aggrandizing bullshit artist and prolific author. As JDF Jones noted in his authorised biography Storyteller: The Lives of Laurens van der Post (2001), van der Post was “a fraud, a fantasist, a liar, a serial adulterer and a paternalist. He falsified his Army record and inflated his own importance at every possible opportunity.”
van der Post is often described as a “close” and “long-time” friend of Carl Jung. The famous Swiss psychoanalyst does not mention van der Post in his autobiography, Memories, Dreams, Reflections (1963).
At age 25, Charles sought out van der Post after reading his books, and van der Post became his spiritual guru. Charles continually sought his advice and absorbed his mystic teachings. In the mid-70’s, Charles began having psychoanalytic treatment with van der Post’s second wife Ingaret, who was a Jungian analyst, and then with van der Post’s friend Dr. Alan McGlashan.
Not only is van der Post William’s godfather, he gave marriage counselling to Charles and Diana and was a frequent guest at Highgrove, Sandringham and Balmoral. On his death Charles initiated the annual van der Post Memorial Lectures, held inside St James’s Palace.
In the 1970s and 1980s it was not public knowledge that van der Post was a pedophile. But Charles was not the public. Then as now, if somebody became very close to the heir to the throne with frequent access to Royal palaces, they were going to be under close investigation by the security services.
It is wildly improbable that the security services did not know about van der Post’s predilection for young girls and that he had been paying the expenses of an illegitimate daughter originally fathered on a young teenage mother.
There is also the question of van der Post’s wider lies. It is possibly neither here nor there that in fact van der Post had only ever spent a fortnight with The Bushmen of the Kalahari when he penned his famous book, full of lies and plagiarism.
But that he was actually a Lieutenant (and at times acting Captain) rather than a Lieutenant Colonel as he claimed, would have been instantly discovered. It is worth noting here that van der Post’s famous military memoir, which became the film Merry Christmas, Mr Lawrence starring David Bowie, was massively embellished, not just in terms of his rank.
The Royalist defence of Charles’ associations rests, rather peculiarly, on the claim that any huckster and pedophile can just get entry to the Palace inner circle without any checks. That is just not true. What appears to be true is that pedophilia was treated as a peccadillo.
van der Post was also a close friend of Margaret Thatcher, exerting an influence on her policy in South Africa. Again, it defies all logic to assume Thatcher was unaware of van der Post’s deviant behaviour.
Louis Mountbatten
Before van der Post, the man credited by all biographers as the greatest influence in shaping Charles’ character was his great uncle, Lord Louis Mountbatten. Born in Austria as Prince Louis of Battenberg, Mountbatten was a serial pedophile.
His pederasty was an open secret in upper class society – including the diplomatic service – long before his death. He benefited from the protection of the inner Royal circle, which was absolute in his lifetime. Mountbatten’s child sexual abuse has only become mainstream acknowledged in the past very few years.
There was not a Fleet Street editor in 50 years who did not know of Mountbatten’s deviancy; they just did not publish it.
Mountbatten’s pedophilia was fueled by his access to underprivileged children, from New Delhi to Rabat to Kincora Boy’s Home in Belfast.
Mountbatten spent more time with Charles in his childhood and early adulthood than Charles’ own parents did, including encouraging and coaching him to have as much sex with as many “non-marriageable” girls as possible, and providing a venue for it in his homes. After the IRA assassinated the privileged pedophile, Charles said, “Life will never be the same now that he is gone”.
A 1944 FBI dossier described Mountbatten as “a homosexual with a perversion for small boys”.
This was two years before his appointment as Viceroy of India, where the open debauchery of the Mountbattens was an open secret in high-level Indian society.
Chris Moore – who started covering the Kincora scandal as a young BBC reporter in 1980 – states MI5 covered up sex abuse at Kincora Boys’ Home to protect members of the British establishment including Mountbatten.
So at the death of van der Post in 1996, Charles had lost two men he viewed, exclusively, as guides and spiritual mentors, and from whom he took the most intimate personal advice. Both were extremely vicious and calculating pedophiles, shielded by class privilege from the consequences.
So, in 1996, to whom did Charles turn as his new “mentor”?
Jimmy Savile
Jimmy Savile was an incredibly evil and disgusting character. He was also Charle’s bestie for over two decades.
Savile was introduced to a 17-year-old Charles in 1966 by Mountbatten, who vouched for him. The official story is that Mountbatten met Savile through military veteran fundraising.
You can believe that was the primary shared interest of two prolific pedophiles, if you so please.
By the 1980s, Savile was corresponding assiduously with Charles, a close friendship that continued for over 20 years. Savile was yet another person to whom Charles turned for marriage counselling. In scores of letters, it is always Charles seeking Savile’s advice and adulating him. Diana stated that Savile was a “sort of mentor” to Charles.
Savile was throughout this period one of the most prolific pedophiles in British history. His sickening repertoire was not confined to pederasty; his ‘charity’ work endowed him with access to hospital morgues, where he reportedly engaged his fetish for necrophilia.
We’re supposed to believe Britain’s extensive and well-resourced surveillance network (including MI5 and Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ)) remained pig-ignorant to his horrifically prolific abuse until after his death in 2011.
In reality, UK police had been made aware of Savile’s predation at least as far back as the early 1960s. The earliest known complaint about Savile dates from 1963, just as his television career “was really beginning to take off.”
It is widely believed the royal cachet helped to protect him from prosecution. A huge amount was known to the police, to BBC managers and to various other branches of the British establishment, but Savile was untouchable.
Bishop Peter Ball
In 2000, Charles constructed a chapel at his home at Highgrove, and a stained glass window in it commemorates Laurens van der Post. Before that window, Charles kneeled for long prayer vigils with his new spiritual guide, Bishop Peter Ball – who was also a friend of Jimmy Savile. It was Savile who introduced Ball to Charles.
Rather like Epstein, Ball was a known pedophile who escaped the first time without incarceration.
He had, in 1993, accepted a police caution for a ceremony in which he had forced a 17-year-old novitiate, Neil Todd, to kneel naked in the snow for hours, whipped him, and then forced him to perform a sex act. The police also investigated at that time numerous other allegations, including two very similar ones.
The decision to caution was taken on the advice of the Crown Prosecution Service. The Independent Inquiry into Child Abuse Report 2022, which of course ignored the serial pederasty of Mountbatten, repeats the tired old “mistakes were made” lie when explaining away the law’s willful blindness to serial pedophilia (p. 15):
“When cases were reported to the police, investigative mistakes were made and, on the rare occasions allegations were referred to the Crown Prosecution Service, the analysis of the evidence was sometimes deficient. Not until much later in time were the named perpetrators finally brought to justice.”
In plain English: The pedo-friendly legal and political system not only looked the other way but covered up child molestation. Wherever possible, it waited until after the perpetrators died before pretending to be concerned.
Despite the police caution, Charles provided Ball with rather splendid rent-free accommodation on his estate.
Ball was suspended by the Church of England as a priest and, astonishingly, Charles asked him to officiate at services and perform the Eucharist at his personal chapel in Highgrove, as reported in the Church Times.
Ball was frequently in his company and was a personal guest at Charles’ 2005 wedding to Camilla.
In 2015, Charles gifted Ball £20,000. This was said to be simply a friendly gesture – exactly why is unclear. Charles is very definitely not known for personal generosity.
In 2015, Bishop Ball was finally convicted of 12 horrific instances of sexual abuse of boys and young men, all under the guise of religious ritual. Prince Charles put out a public denial that he had interfered in the 1993 decision not to prosecute.
But he would say that.
The BBC reported:
Ball’s court case heard that a member of the royal family – who has never been named – was among a host of public figures who supported him when he avoided charges in 1993.
The article goes on to carry this extremely over-specific and narrow denial from the Crown Prosecution Service:
The Crown Prosecution Service has publicly stated that it had neither received nor seen any correspondence from a member of the Royal Family when Ball was under investigation in 1992–93.
Note this very deliberately does not rule out a word in the ear at a function, a phone call, or – as it would be done – getting a friend known to be close to Charles to give the message.
Charles in fact in 1997, two years after his police caution, told Ball that he would directly intervene against Ball victim Neil Todd. “I will see off this horrible man if he tries anything again,” Charles wrote to Ball.
Todd did not live to see Ball ultimately convicted. He committed suicide in 2012. This was convenient for Ball, but there were plenty of other victims who testified in 2015.
Uncle Louis had an official entourage and was plugged in to the system. The immediate civil servants and close protection officers always know everything.
While there is no doubt whatsoever Charles knew about Bishop Peter Ball, the latter’s royal circle protection appears to have broken the surface.
Another Crock Brought to You By the Coincidence Theorists
You can’t have your four closest non-official life guides as pedophiles by accident. You just can’t. It has been proffered that Charles, by nature of his role, knows vastly more people than ordinary folk. That may or may not be true (there is a counter-argument about privilege and protection). But it if were true, it does not improve things. If there is a much larger-than-normal pool from whom Charles could have chosen, it makes it even weirder he chose four prolific pedophiles.
Pedophilia appears prevalent among and attractive to politicians and the ruling class. People wielding much more power and wealth than the rest of us have the ability (rightly or wrongly) to get attractive adult consenting partners more easily. So why do they, apparently in disproportionate numbers, seek to prey on the young and defenceless?
It is more than time we got rid of the Medieval system of monarchy. That will not solve the corruption of corporate interests controlling the state, or redress the appalling inequality of wealth. It will not even do much to end elite class pedophilia. But as one clear demonstration of the rotten nature of British society, the tale of the King’s four pedophile mentors is extremely instructive.
Meet the World’s Biggest Landowner - a Man Who Consorts With Serial Pedophiles
The world’s biggest landowners are King Charles III and the British Royal Family, whose combined landholdings officially span an astonishing 6.6 billion acres.
Across the Commonwealth, especially in countries such as Australia and Canada, there are vast tracts considered ‘Crown land’ and technically held by the monarch. For example, Crown lands comprise around 23% of Australia’s land area and 89% of Canada’s land area.
In reality, the figure is much larger.
There is no mention of a third tier of government in the Australian Constitution; corrupt and wasteful local councils were legislated into existence by state Local Government Acts, and remain entrenched despite two failed referendum attempts to have them added to the Constitution. But try not paying your council rates, and you will quickly be disabused of any delusion that you, and not the ‘Crown’, are the ultimate owner of your property.
Australians spend much of their income paying off exorbitant rents and mortgage debt, while a guy who hangs out with serial pedophiles and has never done a day’s work in his life owns a large chunk of Planet Earth. For no other reason than his ancestors were successful thugs and swindlers.
But you keep blaming hard-working Indian migrants for your life woes. Because the easy targets always make the most convenient scapegoats, right?
This article was an expansion of The Four Mentors of King Charles, authored by Craig Murray, who has generously allowed his article to be reprinted. Please note I have edited some of Craig’s original content and added additional content from other sources.
The global pedophile elite strike again! We just don’t hate the Royals enough. And they always get a Diana or a Kate to make them seem decent. Disgusting.
Read the book, Cannibalism, Blood Drinking and High Adept Satanism by Kerth Barker and you will see that pedophilia is a common thread of evil. The evil enjoy it and it is a method for perpetuating evil. He experienced it all first or second hand and lived to come out the other side and tell about it. Not for the faint of heart.
Here is a pdf version of it. It is pretty disturbing.
https://dn710104.ca.archive.org/0/items/cannibalism-blood-drinking-high-adept-satanism-2014-kerth-barker/Cannibalism%2C%20Blood%20Drinking%20%26%20High-Adept%20Satanism%20%282014%29-Kerth%20Barker.pdf
Not sure i can read that having just read some of a book that is revoltingly evil i- called ‘Pogrammed to K ill’ but ot wss mot what i thought it would be – inhad assumed mind control programmes all round & there are some but mainly its about the most horrifying murders ever etc even including the “Marquise de Sade”s life which has been romanticised vastly it turns out and huz ral behaviour as criminal, depraved and evil as can be – ge enjoyed earing faeces etc Enjoyed murder, torture non- stop and so on. Also sheds light on how prevalent Satanism is in the US, the world & so children are used Proof that the littke angel Jon Benet Ramsay was abused by those close to her ot seems etc. Like IDF psychos, satanists, its v v difficult to realise that some people love this lifestyle it seems ie murd er, cannibalism etc- Rothschilds but many other richest hence powerful.
Yeah, I used to think Satanism was some sort of minor joke. No, its a major thread even at the highest rungs of society and has been for a Long time. The Britsh Royal Family is even deep in pedophilia. The king had 4 major mentors and advisors who were documented pedophiles: Savile, Mountbatten, a priest and one other. There were allegations that 10 African children disappeared under the supervision of the queen.
To choose one pedophile M. Windsor is unfortunate, choosing four looks like carelessness… To paraphrase Wilde… The Rothschild owned UK Royal family is a haven for nonces… Who knew?… Say it isn’t so… Stop the press… etc… F’cking Hanoverians, coming over ‘ere…
Excellent … birds of a feather.
I have a memory of reading a biography of v.d. Post that relates he did yet another teenager on board another ship, again offering to ‘escort’ her across the ocean to her mother in England.
I see around me the adulation still of women in their 80s for the ‘saint’ of standing with the bushmen. It goes hand in hand with having been brainwashed into adulation of the ‘land without a people for a people without a land’. The film of Exodus in 1960 had them swooning with fairy tale joy.
Mercifully, I’m glad to know several South Africans who work with bushmen groups in South Africa and in Namibia, bullshit free, and was privileged to listen to a bushmen tell his story. He said that there were 3 things they valued – ‘Land, Water, Waarheid’ (Lund, vahter, Vaar-hate) Land, Water, Truth. (Afrikaans as a language sits easier with them than English).
The third concept was not part of v.d. Post’s lexicon.
I’m not understanding. Van der post did support the bushmen and entered quite far into their dreamlike culture which allowed him to bend the rules a bit in his own culture. I thought he was fully on board with their rights to have a homeland. Certainly everyone I know who idealised him believe the bushmen deserve a homeland . His shamanic interpretation of truth was influenced by bushman beliefs .. In terms of our culture he was a cad with teen girls tho ..
Will try to relocate the biography to refresh details around his links with the Bushmen. But interesting that Anthony refers to his plagiarism.
he wrote lots of books, I have all of them. The good thing about him I found was the way he validated bushman beliefs and way of life. I find them to be really awesome people with an excellent culture. For a while their countries have tried to modernise them and saw westerners as regressive . Now I’m hoping those countries will start to validate the bushmen lifestyles moreso. We can but hope.
The biography is by JDF Jones – The Many Lives of Laurens Van Der Post. He also wrote a good summary of the major points in a piece for The Guardian. 2 points – many of the bushmen stories were filched from the impeccable, direct research of Wilhelm Van Bleek and his sister in law, Lucy Norton with Bushmen prisoners in Cape Town. I have read those stories and taught them. Secondly, my brother-in-law participated in the negotiations taking Rhodesia-Zimbabwe to independent Zimbabwe. My father was also an MP at the time. I never once heard mention of Van Der Post.
So all in all, maybe the ‘v’ could be omitted from the word ‘Lives’.
A ‘cad’ probably includes paedophilia maybe rape..These entitked well connected tyoes can get away with murder.
Money promotes psychopaths to power… A dangerous tool for that. And an archaic one – We have the tech to obsolete that tool that accounts for the energy We add into a system as it’s foundational function.
I do hope to see Many sharing awareness that We can all live richly when free energy tech is wrested from Their grip and the point to accounting for Our energy added vanishes.
Then scum like these Ones will have no power and become petty criminals for anything unEthical They choose to do.
It concerns me that people don’t realise how many cultures embrace ‘young love’ . In many religions, sadly, a child would be considered ‘blessed’ to attract the affections of a high ranking older man. We have to understand the way the world is in order to defend our own sense of how it ought to be .
The rebuttal is less of a rebuttal and more of an apologia… Yeah, he might have been a bullshit artist with a “salacious lovelife”, but that’s OK cos he told good stories.
“A much larger problem for Jones is that he is wholly incapable of understanding those qualities in Laurens which evoked such extraordinary response from millions of readers, such love from his wide circle of friends, and which gave him his unique position in the inner life of our age. The point about his writings on the Bushmen, like his gift for holding an audience rapt with his lectures, was not that every detail of what he said was factually true. It was that he opened up a spiritual dimension to life in our spiritless modern world like no one else, As a friend once put it, ‘Laurens was a dreamer. He lived half way between heaven and earth.’ OK, with some of the details of his own life, he turns out to have been rather more of a Walter Mitty than we had realised. But even this was somehow all of a part with his power to give a mythic dimension to life, investing everything which happened with a cosmic resonance.”
https://archive.spectator.co.uk/article/20th-october-2001/58/small-lies-and-the-greater-truth
Was he a serial paedophile preying on underprivileged or sick kids a la Saville? Probably not.
Was he willing to throw decency and morality out the window when presented with an opportunity to f*ck (and impregnate) a 14yo girl, trusted unto his care? Almost certainly, yes.
I’m not sure the gap between these two things is what’s important, even if a gap exists at all.
Sure, it’s fair to say that the burden of proof is higher for an author who clearly has an axe to grind, or is politically motivated, or is a serial fantasist etc.
But that’s not Booker’s aargument.
His argument is essentially “Well, even if Vanderpost was a serial paedo, or just a one time opportunistic kiddy rapist, we should ignore that because he’s SUCH a wonderful storyteller and because he opened so many people’s eyes to wonders”.
And that’s just a morally vacuous argument. It’s the same BS line trotted out about every spiritual guru or “great man” who turns out to be a sexual abuser – “Oh, must he’s so great we must forgive him his sins of the flesh, his moral failings, his petty weaknesses”.
yeah. no.
Oh grow up. There are other sources that claim this as well.
Klaus Schwab also a mentor to Charles for decades & the former advocates paedophilia as an ideal way to have sx without increasing world population…
Unless he forced them ( very possible of course) i cannot understand how any female could manage to not find Van der Post repulsive- but I guess these public school reptiles have guile on their side…Charles also – without his royalty…
Of course he forced them
Rothschild owned and related to…In terbreeding of the 2 dynasties ( die nasties) for mutual gain- one lot desired
social status, acceptance, the other needed huge loans for more wars ( looting etc)& so the deal was done…The Rothschilds known to be Satanists etc of which paedophilia seems to be a part…Charles resembles Jacob Rothschild etc
Many mock me when I make these accusations against the Antichrist Charles. I will send them this article if I may.
I did not know this about LVD. Beyond horrifying.
Makes sense why UK is going Muslim. Guess what Muslims are totally okay with?
Pray for Justice.
Guess what many white people, “Chosen Ones” and Catholics are totally okay with?
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/australia-the-other-pedo-island
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/high-ranking-israeli-arrested-in
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/stop-celebrating-the-new-pope-he
“Why Catholics? On what grounds? ”
Surely you jest.
I didn’t focus on anyone, Win – “Philip” did.
I wrote an article about absurdly wealthy and privileged WHITE pedos, and he somehow twisted the topic into an anti-Muslim slur.
He claims Muslims are OK with pedophilia, I’m assuming based upon the claim that Muhammad married a child. Let’s assume that’s true, even though religious fables have a habit of not being true (virgins giving birth, anyone?).
He didn’t quantify the portion of Muslims he believed to be okay with pederasty. He simply stated “Muslims”, the implication that everyone identifying as Islam is “totally” okay with pedophilia.
Which is a totally fucktarded statement, but let’s humor you and him for a moment.
If all Muslims are “totally” okay with pedophilia because of what their alleged prophet did back in the 7th century, what do we logically assume about people who belong to an organization whose CURRENT earthly chief is a known pedo-protector?
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/stop-celebrating-the-new-pope-he
What do we logically assume about people who belong to an organization that, not 1300 years ago, but in PRESENT TIMES has covered up and continues to cover up the behavior of the countless gown-wearing pedophile monsters in its employ?
People in glasshouses shouldn’t throw stones, Win.
England doesn’t need Muslims to foment a pedo culture – Mother England has always had a strong culture of pederasty. Age of consent in 18th-century England for girls with regard to sexual intercourse was a grand old 10 years of age.
What’s that, you say?
It was a different era back then?
Hmmm, that’s exactly what Muhammad defenders say…
No I’m talking about all the rape gangs committed by Muslims that the UK government was totally okay with. To your point, it’s cause the UK government are ambivalent to pedophilia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal
https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2025/02/08/britain-s-grooming-gangs-under-renewed-scrutiny-and-investigations_6737919_4.html
https://news.sky.com/story/grooming-gangs-scandal-timeline-what-happened-what-inquiries-there-were-and-how-starmer-was-involved-after-elon-musks-accusations-13285021
So first you indicated all Muslims are “totally okay with” pedophilia, now you’re acknowledging the (predominantly white) “UK government was totally okay with” it. Glad you’re coming around, but you can stop pretending to somehow rebut what I’m saying.
The reality is pederasty is a global phenomenon with perpetrators from all different colors and creeds. White folks and western religions are the last entities fit to be casting stones at other colors and creeds.
It us not a Moslem or issue – most chikd murderers, traffickers seem to be white men. Your racism is Trumpian,
“Mr Bond, they have a saying in Chicago: ‘Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it’s enemy action'” (Ian Fleming).
And many many more still unmasked
The Pedophile Viceroy pimped out his wife to the British agent JL Nehru to sabotage the independence of India and partition the country
The French had the right idea in 1789.
So it seems to me the conspiracy theories are correct that rich pedos run the world. Disgusting. And to have priests and men of the supposed cloth doing those things to kids. Where were the parents of those kids? It can they let that happen?
Tortured, murdered and eaten
I wonder if Mountbatten was murdered by the IRA because he did something to one of their children?
Craig Murray believes Mountbatten was targeted by the IRA because of his sexual predation at Kincora, I can’t find anything online to substantiate this but it’s possible it was a motivating factor.
Apparently Mountbatten and British politicians & other chikd rapists. murderers ‘owned a children’s hone in Itelanc calke ‘Kincorra’ (if that is the spelling) Where the usual ‘children’s days out’ happened and suremy staff there knew what was happening…Mountbatten a prolific paecophile when he was Viceroy of India for yrs I believe it was – many boys…His wife depraved also apparently..
Depressingly disgusting to comprehend. Another insight into absolute corruption throughout absolute power.
“You can’t have your four closest non-official life guides as pedophiles by accident.”
The implication being that Charles chose them because they were paedophiles. But you say yourself that Mountbatten introduced Savile to Charles and Savile introduced Ball to Charles!
As a thinking and non-deviant adult, if someone introduced me to four pedos whose sexual predilections were an open secret, exactly ZERO would become my close personal confidants.
@MakeWoodchippersGreatAgain
Here is the full paragraph:
“Another Crock Brought to You By the Coincidence Theorists
You can’t have your four closest non-official life guides as pedophiles by accident. You just can’t. It has been proffered that Charles, by nature of his role, knows vastly more people than ordinary folk. That may or may not be true (there is a counter-argument about privilege and protection). But it if were true, it does not improve things. If there is a much larger-than-normal pool from whom Charles could have chosen, it makes it even weirder he chose four prolific pedophiles.”
Your meaning is absolutely clear. You are saying that the existence of four paedophiles among Charles’s circle of friends cannot possibly be coincidence and the only possible alternative explanation is that Charles chose them because they were paedophiles.
I have explained the flaw in your logic and you are pretending that you said something else.
Get a life. One that doesn’t involve defending people who happily consort with pedos.
The thrust of the article is that KC had four very close confidants/mentors who were pedos, and that there is no way King Chuckie – with the massive security and investigative apparatus around him – could not have been aware of this. He CHOSE to maintain his association with these deviants despite this.
In the case of Bishop Peter Ball, Chuckie promised to intervene, calling the victim a “horrible man”. That victim later committed suicide.
Any other questions, oh brave defender of royal pedo protectors?
One wonders about charles himself. Pedophiles of a feather flock together.
at the very least i see the reason for his multiple affairs. which is always a terrible way to live.
Probably he is just not caught yet
Unbelievable !!!!……these people are sick and we’re supposed to look up to these freaks of nature
I think lord Mountbatten was a great person, he freed India, and greatly helped in it’s becoming a great and prosperous nation
Mountbatten was a very active paedophile in India and Britsin.
You choose to remain in denial?
Are you serious??
Sickening. William and Kate must be horrified. Thank God for Diana.
The church is still very trusted as are the rich suchbax royals who are worshipped by multi millions in the UK and the world deskite tgem being criminals fir many centuries and parasites who keeo the world in poverty
by looting, genocides etc UK royals heloed crrate Isrsel which has destroyed, looted, genocided the Middle East with UK. US military making trillions in profit a year
It is not “the church”. There have always been perverse individuals in the church and always will be because there will always be wolves in sheep’s clothing. There are many good people and leaders in the church and always will be. Individuals can be corrupt, but the gates of hell will not prevail against the true church..
There ate akways good people true but organised religion is a business like others often ie after the cash. When I see the “hell and brimstone’ preachers’ of the US who are millionaires, plus tge Vatican tellingbnillions of people that God or Jesus wants them to be ‘vaccinated’ etc I know power and evil is at work.
3 hook nosed Kikes and a Catholic, perfect.
Who gives a fuck?
about time this was addressed in sunlight
It never will be fully u til the most powetful ie richest on earth suchbas trillionaire satanist Rothschilds, their relatives the IzK & Eurooean royals, Vatican destroyed…
Dude …
Extraordinary horror.
This article was copied from Craig Murray’s website and Substack.
Anthony Colpo fully acknowledges this, with Craig Murray’s permission, at the end of the piece.
As Valerie notes, I clearly acknowledge Craig and his original article at the end of this post…
I clearly acknowledge Craig at the end of the article…
A person with character would say something like “oops, silly me, I skipped past the acknowledgement in my hurry to accuse you of copying someone else. My bad!”
But nope, you dig your heels further in and tell me to put the acknowledgement up front. Classy.
I’ll position the acknowledgement wherever I damn well please. I don’t hear Craig complaining, I’m sure he’d be happy with the extra traffic coming his way via the links to his article and website.
What a fucking idiot. I don’t know you from a bag of shit and have no idea whether or not you read the original Craig Murray article. I have no expectations of people I’ve never met, except that they don’t behave like obnoxious assholes toward me. You’ve broken that most simple and reasonable of expectations, so it’s time for you to get gone. Bye bye!
Why copy other people’s work? Write your own!
Why accuse others of plagiarism when the author of the article this post was built upon is CLEARLY acknowledged at the end of the post?
True story. As a teenager a friend and myself chanced upon Saville handing out autographs. “Hey lads!”he cried, “Would you like my autograph?” Now my mate had a very sharp sense of humour and so he said, “Jim, would you like my autograph?” Saville looked puzzled, shook his head and said “No.” “Well then,” said my friend, “Why the fuck would I want yours?”
LOL, well played by your friend!
This is so fucked up.
Three of the four have the word ‘Satan’ in their full names (Mountbatten has a lot of names!). Peter Ball is the exception.
Thus Laurens Jan van der Post can become
– Judas perv ronnel Satan
And James Wilson Vincent Savile can become
– Satanism Jew nonce lvi evils
As to Peter Ball, he became a bishop in 1977 and from when the sexual abuse is supposed to have started.
Bishop Peter Ball anagrams to ‘be blt saprophile’ where saprophile means lover of the rotten. Perhaps the title is as much the problem as anything, people then think they are entitled to do what the please.
Leftist, progressive king Charles. Look into his best friend Jimmy Savile who had keys to multiple mansions owned by the Crown. He had child rape dungeons. Used to kill the kids for fun.
You might find this an interesting article about the royal family and it will be a bit disturbing for some people to comprehend it. It would be worth while to look at her work and her backstory.
Now about who she is on about in this article I would say that Diana was a good one of them and then she/he come to realise the actual evil of the cult she/he was born into aka royalty. It’s going to be hard for the majority of people to accept it but we are ruled by a class of hermaphrodite inverted transgenders of cult going back to biblical times and the Turkic Mongals khazarians.
The following content is taken from one of her posts on TG:
She married into the black nobility bloodline and she’s revealing everything about them and the history of it to save the children and mothers and the femininity which creates balance and harmony in our realm but as been dominated for too long by male chauvinistic egoism greed and power over the human race..
“Dirty Diana – Tribe of Dan engaging Judah… first part. Will be continued…
“It has been prophesised that the anti-christ will have a father from the tribe of Dan an a mother of the tribe of Judah” -Because they are fake Jews. (Charles & Diana).
Well… and then some IIIuminated Bavarian guys pop up. And one of them engaged and married a very “mad” real mum… a non androgyne one…
Me.
A real mum, who does not accept or respect any child abuse nor elite idiocracy.
Mama vs Maffia
Trudi Verstegen
Openbaar Aanklager & Openbaar Onderzoeker Children’s Defense Force
Mama van Nikki, Mart & Madelief Splinter
Nobility in No More Masonic Slavery
http://www.trudiverstegen.nl
06-52428888
Justice for the Children